EVE-Search ForumWatch

EVE-Search ForumWatch http://eve-search.com/ The alternative EVE-Online Forum browser. en-us Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000 EVE-Search RSS Module v1.1 chribba@evemail <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#50

]]> Tue, 3 Jan 2009 16:14:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6149277 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by ELECTR0FREAK]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#49

Originally by: TomB

Reactivation Delay will stay between jumps, but there is nothing that stops Covert Ops frigs and Recon cruisers from getting a similar bonus as the stealth bombers have.

Consider that a done done.

Thank you TomB! Good to know that the cloak ships besides bombers will be able to do their job again.

-Electrofreak
Discoverer of the Missile Damage Formula]]> Tue, 3 Jan 2009 08:23:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6151655 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Zhon]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#48 ]]> Tue, 3 Jan 2009 03:37:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6152415 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Kage Getsu]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#47

Originally by: TomB

Reactivation Delay will stay between jumps, but there is nothing that stops Covert Ops frigs and Recon cruisers from getting a similar bonus as the stealth bombers have.

Consider that a done done.

That's an even better solution than I had hoped. Thanks!
]]> Tue, 3 Jan 2009 01:28:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6152992 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by The Cosmopolite]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#46

Originally by: TomB

Reactivation Delay will stay between jumps, but there is nothing that stops Covert Ops frigs and Recon cruisers from getting a similar bonus as the stealth bombers have.

Consider that a done done.

Many thanks.

Cosmo

Jericho Fraction]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 22:19:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6154011 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by j0sephine]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#45 "Reactivation Delay will stay between jumps, but there is nothing that stops Covert Ops frigs and Recon cruisers from getting a similar bonus as the stealth bombers have."

While you're on the subject of cloaking and recon cruisers... is the unability of recons to cloak while they have the cynosural field generator fitted (not running or even onlined) ... intended, or just an overlook, and will it be corrected? ;;

]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 16:42:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6155851 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Joerd Toastius]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#44

Originally by: TomB

Reactivation Delay will stay between jumps, but there is nothing that stops Covert Ops frigs and Recon cruisers from getting a similar bonus as the stealth bombers have.

Consider that a done done.

]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 16:21:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6155947 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Elfaen Ethenwe]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#43
wait a few seconds (yes wait)

set warp

activate cloak.

DONE DEAL.

]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 14:55:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6156351 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Redundancy]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#42 ]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 13:19:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6156826 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by TomB]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#41
Consider that a done done.

.]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 13:17:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6156837 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Joerd Toastius]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#40 ]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 12:44:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6156988 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Redundancy]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#39 ]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 11:22:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6157463 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Tobiaz]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#38

Originally by: Redundancy

If patch notes could magically document bugs and unforseen consequences of changes, I imagine everyone's life would be easier.

Players don't really mind the incompplete shoddy patch notes. They DO mind their complaints and demands for explanation about the so many undocumented changes being completely stonewalled.

A perfect example: The EW stacking bug/nerf thread

17 pages about either a VERY big bug or a HUGE brainfart at CCP and all we got was a *click*.

Or how about the insane stacking of the penalties of some of the T2 ammo?

Or how about some T2 missiles making a completely Joke of that big 'missile-nerf' we had a while back. You know: the one that gave frigates better survival chances agains missileboats (and I'm Caldari mind you!)

Or how about the huge change with the factories? Can we get a new skill? 'User-Interface' : +10% understanding how to deal with CCPs jokes of a UI like the new Manufactory/Research one or even parts of the Corp tab and wallet. I know it's ofcourse the factories a necessary new feature, but it's so complex and undocumented it might just as well be a stealthnerf.

And even IF a stealthnerf is actually a bug it will be solved somewhere in Januari at best, when CCP ofcourse wants to fix a whole bunch of bugs at once with their stupid, likely to fail, all-in-one patches. If we're lucky they'll fix it without breaking to much else ugh

No wonder there are 'unforeseen consequences' like the locator agent bug and the buddylist bug which make EVE unplayable for many of us AND WEEKS LATER IT'S STILL NOT FIXED!!!

Evil or Very Mad

Quote:
Since the release of Red Moon Rising, we have deployed 11 hotfixes in downtimes addressing 28 various performance and crash issues on Tranquility. In addition to that, a small client patch is being assembled for deployment in the first week of January. Until then we will continue to deploy server hotfixes during downtime since we have still not achieved our goal of better overall performance than our Cold War release had.

ROFL

Seems to me CCP care mostly about those few extra percent performance and wether or not their new harware toys outgame and new ships and modules ingame are working (I'll leave out 'properly' here).

But players who know how to deal with EVE's lag problems, who laugh at occasional blackholes and who are not drooling over all the new toys are ****** until (hopefully) Januari. Because they depend on things like locator agents, the buddylist, EW proper working factories etc. to actually do their things.

Yeah I'm ranting and no, I don't care right now.
I'm off again to play Total War or something. Evil or Very Mad

RMR hiatus]]> Mon, 2 Jan 2009 01:20:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6159394 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Kage Getsu]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#37
Also, it kind of gimps the Covert Ops class.
]]> Sun, 1 Jan 2009 19:53:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6160847 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#36

]]> Sun, 1 Jan 2009 17:44:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/6161453 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Ghost003]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#35
As for the bombers having a 5 sec recalibration time that is a specialization built into the ship that the regular covert ops frigs do not have and were not build to have. As it was before stealth bombers were rather useless. I still personally think that the stealth bombers and Covert op frigs should both use the Covert ops cloaking devise seeing how they are covert ops frigs, but that is just my opinion.
]]> Sat, 31 Dec 2009 11:46:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/903782 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Drakxter]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#34

Originally by: lickspittle

This was intentional. There is a generic attribute that game design can set on modules, which determines how quickly it can be reactivated after it deactivates. This is used for cloaking, but it is also used now for the siege modules - which have a long reactivation delay (something like 10 minutes I think). If this delay is not observed when you jump, this means that jumping, or docking can be used as a exploit to get around the constraints that use of the siege module should entail.

So, no, this was not done as part of a vendetta to nerf covert ops cloakers. If you feel that being able to avoid the constraints that come (or should have come in the past) with cloaking is the only thing that makes it usable, then TomB and Tuxford are your men. Take it to a forum area where they post about game design and address it there.

You know lickspittle, that whole posts sounds a bit messed up..

You say you added this to fix the exploit with siege modules, and that you can decide on what modules you want to add it or not, its not something you are forced to add to all modules.... But still you say you added it to the covert ops modules anyway becuase you where fixing the siege moduel? So Err what?! Shocked

-------------
]]> Sat, 31 Dec 2009 11:13:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/647423 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by UndergrounD]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#33
Ill run the log server and file a bug report next time.
-----------------------------------------------

]]> Fri, 30 Dec 2009 15:06:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2535445 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Redundancy]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#32 ]]> Thu, 29 Dec 2009 15:43:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1997381 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by UndergrounD]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=2#31
it is a nerf for all intents and purposes despite any protestions to the contrary or declared best intentions by the developement team.

bah =(

-----------------------------------------------

]]> Thu, 29 Dec 2009 15:00:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2535444 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Tar om]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#30 --
We are the Octavian Vanguard www.octavianvanguard.net

"The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions."]]> Thu, 29 Dec 2009 13:49:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2375845 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Sarmaul]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#29

Originally by: Silver Sarena

stuff

those paragraphs still want to be your friend
-------------
Please make Minmatar overpowered, CCP]]> Tue, 27 Dec 2009 10:56:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2109128 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#28

]]> Tue, 27 Dec 2009 10:18:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/546332 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Silver Sarena]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#27
For the record, Frost, I know EXACTLY what you are talking about. I was talking about the same thing. Sorry if that was unclear to anyone. (Notice the above and below paragraphs! Isn't everyone proud of me! Wink

)
Now on to Dev Redundancy and his comments. For the record, if it matters to anyone, I never said the "developers were ruining the game." Nor was it my intention to imply such. I am sure there are many dedicated individuals working hard on the game, who love and care about it even more than I do, which is a stretch of the imagination. However, just to be perfectly clear: I DO think the apparent obsession of some devs to re-address ships/modules/rules that are well established and working outstandingly, may very well, some day, do just that. ESPECIALLY when they obviously do not carefully (enough) consider all of the ramifications on other systems and settings to the changes they make.
I do not feel that my "accusations" that the devs are careless and thoughtless, at times, is unfounded by the simple fact of the "Bug Creation/Fix Dance" we go through EVERYTIME there is a major patch. On average it takes 2-3 months to work out everything that got BROKE, while things were being "enhanced". I.E. Hence this very discussion and thread.
Thanks go out to everyone for reading and taking note of my comments. I very sincerely hope that my comments get the problem duely noticed and fixed as Dev Redundancy has promissed. This was my only goal in all of my comments: I.E. Yelling LOUD enough to get the problem noticed. This will, however, be my last post as my type of "constructive comments" are obviously not wanted, welcome, or desired by the Devs. Everyone can now celebrate that they will not be hearing from me again. Razz

So, good luck to everyone! Happy holidays too.
]]> Tue, 27 Dec 2009 09:24:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2217025 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by The Cosmopolite]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#26

Originally by: Redundancy

I sometimes wonder if posting something to show that we do care gets in the way of people wanting to just rant about how intent we are on ruining the game for them. I'll be following up on this with Game Design when I get back to work after my holiday. In the meantime, I hope everyone enjoys Christmas and New Year without going purple, passing out and ending up in hospital due to this.

Heh. Well it's much appreciated that you have posted, Redundancy. Just glad it's on the radar screen.

Cosmo

Jericho Fraction]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 19:37:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2416647 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#25

]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 15:56:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/546414 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Redundancy]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#24 ]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 15:52:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1997379 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#23

]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 14:15:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/546413 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Hayzo]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#22

Originally by: Silver Sarena

This is just yet ANOTHER example of the developers making their own lives easier and simply not caring about how it affects the people paying their salaries. For what it is worth, I second, third, and however many other times is necessary to get the point across, the notion that an added 30 second delay on covert ops cloak reactivation is just plain stupid. The cloak has been engineered into the game as being of such a limited use, in such SPECIALIZED roles, anyway. To nerf it more is just rediculous. If you don't want cloak in the game that badly, just take it out. Keep in mind, I am NOT suggesting that you DO, in fact, take it out. But, if you continue to nerf things this hard, just remove them and get it over with; rather than tricking your players into wasteing months of subscription time for something they think is going to be totally cool just to yank it away from them when they get there. Please, for the love of everything holy, fix cloaking back to the way it was! Oh, and how about focusing on adding MORE NEW material instead of f'ing with material that everyone already knows how to use and is comfortable with? You know, MORE NEW STUFF, MORE QUICKLY, like what we pay for. If you would just STOP messing with what you already have firmly established and simply focused on new material, I bet you would be AMAZED at how much value you could add to the game, and how quickly you could do it.

Paragraphs are your friend.
____________________

"Your safe Boundaries were once unknown frontiers"

Join channel: TKI-Net]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 11:16:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/999968 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Silver Sarena]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#21 ]]> Mon, 26 Dec 2009 06:13:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2217024 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Redundancy]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#20 ]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 19:14:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1997378 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Ranger 1]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#19
And yes, there is a lot going on now, but this should have been announced in advance.

]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 18:26:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1972417 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Shinoobie]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#18
Im Caldari, each major patch I got nerfed in some way or another, so I trained for covert ops and leadership skills, now you nerfed the Covert side of things.

So I guess all I'm good for now, is sitting in gangs and doing jack s**t but giving my gang skills bonus to everyone else who are Non Caldari.
http://img208.exs.cx/img208/1889/siggy9ox.jpg
Shuttles

Maximum signture image dimensions are 400x120 - Udat]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 17:56:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2192939 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Anjerrai Meloanis]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#17 uh.

]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 16:27:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/106291 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Lig Lira]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#16

Join FCON]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 15:56:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1439574 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Reto]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#15 ffs this one has almost killed me...i was giving a warp order to the ship and hit F1 as i was moving...and then i recognized : "hey 28.2seconds delay matey hehehehe! lets see if u survive those 2 ceptors aproaching u with 4000m/s right now !!"
i was so freekin damn lucky fitting those nanofibers which aligned me fast enuff for warp before they got me webbed and scrambeled Shocked

tbh remove this crapy delay or give the cloak a 5 secs delay like mentioned above...this is simply unacceptable...why should ppl use covert ops if they cannot follow the enemy safely...
and btw why u guys coupling the delay functions for modules...what has a cloak to do with a siege module or a titan massacre thingy ?!
]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 15:52:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2009980 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Stribog]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#14 And there is alot more Covert Ops jumping around then Dreadnaughts, so i dont really see the point of having it this way.
]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 09:37:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2329068 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by ELECTR0FREAK]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#13

-Electrofreak
Discoverer of the Missile Damage Formula]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 03:11:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/711564 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Drunken Santa]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#12
The "workaround" is to stay cloaked after jumping until you'll be able to cloak using your module. It's irritating, but it has the desired result. Consequently, CCP might as well just let us stealthy types use our cloak properly again Neutral

]]> Sun, 25 Dec 2009 01:45:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/665074 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Maya Rkell]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#11

Originally by: lickspittle

So in altering siege modules, you nerfed cloaks? That's called a bug, and it should be fixed. Sigh. Well, I don't want a cloaking cruiser now, and I'll just fit a T1 cloak on my covert and use it for scanning ships down.

Warning: above post may contain traces of sarcasm.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted."]]> Sat, 24 Dec 2009 03:16:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1596661 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Turin]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#10

Originally by: lickspittle

Well, unfortunately, this is a retarded change. You have effectivly made cov ops ships useless when trying to scout if a group has ships in two sectors. You cant possibly avoid them at both gates. Thanks for nerfing me some more ( im caldari ) I really appriciate it. Merry f'in Xmas to you to.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

]]> Sat, 24 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2512679 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Jaka]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#9 ]]> Fri, 23 Dec 2009 21:00:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1127919 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Ahop Yol]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#8 ]]> Fri, 23 Dec 2009 19:39:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/40348 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by theRaptor]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#7

I don't think you trust, in, my, self-righteous suicide.]]> Fri, 23 Dec 2009 14:42:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2441587 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Tar om]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#6
Please find a way to restore the previous behaviour of Cov Ops frigates and cloaks - it worked fine and appeared to be universally accepted.

Tar om
--
We are the Octavian Vanguard www.octavianvanguard.net

"The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions."]]> Fri, 23 Dec 2009 10:21:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2375838 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Herko Kerghans]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#5

Originally by: The Cosmopolite

The Stealth Bomber now has a 5 second reactivation delay for its cloak.

It is very odd that this means the recon class T2 cloaking frigate has a longer cloak reactivation delay.

I therefore suggest that the Covert Ops frigates get the 5 sec reactivation delay also

What he said.

Makes little sense that a stealth bomber can recloak in 5 secs, while a covops (being the only ships that can use covert ops cloaking device) still needs 30 secs to recloak.

Putting them on par would solve the after-jump delay, too, as indicated above.

Barriers - an EVE novel]]> Fri, 23 Dec 2009 02:48:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1020844 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by The Cosmopolite]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#4
The Stealth Bomber now has a 5 second reactivation delay for its cloak.

It is very odd that this means the recon class T2 cloaking frigate has a longer cloak reactivation delay.

I therefore suggest that the Covert Ops frigates get the 5 sec reactivation delay also. Plenty short enough time to address the concerns expressed here (which I share) and as it's been done for one ship is clearly a feasible fix.

Cosmo

PS. Posting here because Ships and Mods is being spammed to death by a very selfish individual and the mods have not caught up. (Says the guy with millions of SPs in EW himself...)

Jericho Fraction]]> Thu, 22 Dec 2009 21:24:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2416640 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by lickspittle]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#3
So, no, this was not done as part of a vendetta to nerf covert ops cloakers. If you feel that being able to avoid the constraints that come (or should have come in the past) with cloaking is the only thing that makes it usable, then TomB and Tuxford are your men. Take it to a forum area where they post about game design and address it there.

-- Richard
CCP Programmer. Anything said above is not the official line, but my own take or opinion.]]> Thu, 22 Dec 2009 19:42:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/1435611 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Shai Faetal]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650&page=1#2 Edited by: Shai Faetal on 22/12/2005 12:46:37
its anoying yes, woudl explain the sudden increase of covert ops ship kills on killboards Rolling Eyes

, ppl decloak jump, try to warp, and cant activate cloak due to timer,not being able to warp fast enough for an inty to lock = screwed.

must sit and wait for timer to run out before trying to warp or move

---

_ my sig is better then urs, damn right! _]]> Thu, 22 Dec 2009 12:46:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/2171368 <![CDATA[Recloaking timer carrying over in jumps? - by Deakin Frost]]> http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=266650
If it's a bug, please fix it.

If it's intentional, then what's the idea behind it? A covert ops is really only useful for recon. If you're unable to punch through blockades nearly unseen as fast as possible, you can aswell box the ship in.

If you want to catch up an enemy fleet, the 14au/s alone won't really cut it on most inner system warps (usually only on long jumps), since practically it makes just a lesser difference. Having the recloaking timer carry over into the next system doesn't help if you're faced with troddlers trying themselves to catch up with their own fleet. If you need to catch up, you have to initiate the warp without cloaking, which will pretty much get you killed when there are hostile trails around.

If you're just trying to add risk to covops pilots, release the anticloak pulse module, but do not gimp our recon abilities.

]]> Wed, 21 Dec 2009 21:11:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/546405