http://eve-search.com/ The alternative EVE-Online Forum browser. en-us Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000 EVE-Search RSS Module v1.1 chribba@evemail http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#14 It gives him time to call for backup over TS or something else, which is risky, but if he logs back in, you can have him scrambled in a second and repeat your demand, stating that if he logs off or any backup appears, you will destroy the freighter before it disappears. At that point, if he's logged off, you at least presented your demands and made it clear to him what he'd lose if he logged out.


Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources.]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 19:16:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401362 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#13 Originally by: Drakxter

---

interesting idea.

Needs a bit more things to it though:

It should need "fuel" as in marines to do the boarding. If boarding was unsucces full you loose all the marines, if it was succes full you get some of them back (as some most likely died in attempting to board)
When its activated on a ship and the pilot of that ship starts self destruct, self destruct should have X % chance of failing (could be restarted).

The ship being boarded would be harder to baord if it has it own marines on board on top of its normal crew.

A module like this would also need other drastic changes to general combat in EVE.

---

I can see it now. Industrial ships pretending to be small mineral transport when really it houses 15,000 m3 of marines ready to board an enemy BS.
]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 18:43:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401538 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#12 Originally by: Drakxter

---

interesting idea.

Needs a bit more things to it though:

It should need "fuel" as in marines to do the boarding. If boarding was unsucces full you loose all the marines, if it was succes full you get some of them back (as some most likely died in attempting to board)
When its activated on a ship and the pilot of that ship starts self destruct, self destruct should have X % chance of failing (could be restarted).

The ship being boarded would be harder to baord if it has it own marines on board on top of its normal crew.

A module like this would also need other drastic changes to general combat in EVE.

---

Actually to be fair, if the boarded party has marines as well and the boarding attempt fails, the boarders should risk loosing his own ship to bording! (Risk/Reward)

Not that I actually think bording is a good idea in the game as it is currently designed.
---
The Advanced Drone Control Panel.]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 18:09:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401752 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#11
Needs a bit more things to it though:

It should need "fuel" as in marines to do the boarding. If boarding was unsucces full you loose all the marines, if it was succes full you get some of them back (as some most likely died in attempting to board)
When its activated on a ship and the pilot of that ship starts self destruct, self destruct should have X % chance of failing (could be restarted).

The ship being boarded would be harder to baord if it has it own marines on board on top of its normal crew.

A module like this would also need other drastic changes to general combat in EVE.
-------------
]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 18:02:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401824 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#10

In all seriousness i think this mod suck- pirates would have to ransom anymore as you just NOS/ECM them and then make them eject.
]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:59:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401863 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#9 ---
Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:58:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401864 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#8
simple!

-------------------Sig-----------------------

welcome to eve, a game for the unemployed, the t2 bpo winners, GTC sellers, macro miners and agent *****s]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:53:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401922 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#7 Originally by: Blitz'Krieg

---

I dont understand the objection really. He would lose his ship anyway, and if you have the facilities and the power to capture it i dont see why not.

---

insurance?

you eject from a ship u dont get the insurace if someone then takes it!

it puts the whole insurace system up for a change and by that i mean no insurance at all, which i rly dont see happening

-------------------Sig-----------------------

welcome to eve, a game for the unemployed, the t2 bpo winners, GTC sellers, macro miners and agent *****s]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:49:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401963 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#6 ]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:48:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401970 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#5 ]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:46:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5401999 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#4 Edited by: Kery Nysell on 17/05/2006 17:47:23
So, you want a module that will allow you, after you have rendered your opponent helpless with ECM, NOS and the like, to eject his pod so you can kill him at your leisure, AND then steal his ship ?

I smell griefing there ...

How about no ?

EDIT : oooh and by the way, if the Freighter is unsupported to the point of being blown by the poor piwates, the billions lost are entirely the fault of the Freighter's support fleet (or lack thereof).

A Freighter loaded with billions of stuff should ALWAYS be supported by a well-thought fleet.

]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:44:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5402012 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#3 ]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:43:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5402019 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173&page=1#2 -------------

-------------
]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:41:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5402041 http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=339173
Its all very honerable going down in flames and not paying the ransom's etc but i would like to see a module that forces a pilot to eject.

I would make the module very close range and one that takes a fair amount of time (5 minutes maybe)in order to work. Perhaps it could be a requirement that the target is into structure, altho i'm not in favour of this. I think that this would add an extra element of role play and full game dimentions that is not previously here, with ecm taking a greater role.

Perhaps like the boarding time to sig radious and give it a percentage chance like ecm? This way a frigate would have a small chance against a bs, and visa versa which seems to me reasonable.

I believe this would partially solve the freighter problem, and add an extra level to fleet fights including the capital ships. Maybe it'd even pull the 150km gate campers a little bit closer, you never know.
]]> Wed, 17 May 2009 17:39:00 +0000 eve-search/guid/5402065