Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow wrote: That's what I expect them to say, and it's very clear. You clearly missed the first post that said to ask any questions about ISBoxer or any activity that remotely relates to ISBoxer in a ticket. We have been asking for the p...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.29 02:52:09
|
2. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow wrote: Wrong. As for your mention of TS3, see the Third Party Policy under Client Modification, which states: "the use of programs that provide in-game overlays (Mumble, Teamspeak) is not something we plan to actively police at this t...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.29 02:49:37
|
3. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow, let's try something new. You submit a ticket and ask, in your own words, about the legality of ISBoxer's VideoFX software, or the legality of using Windows Aero. If CCP says anything other than "You should read the post" or "ask your qu...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.29 02:39:38
|
4. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: but we'd be going in circles You're right. You keep attempting to bring up points about violations of the EULA, and I keep demolishing them when I mention EVEMon and TS3. Then you attempt to argue PLEX, to which Lucas and I co...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.29 02:11:52
|
5. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: I already have - Automated inputs. It is acknowledged that singular, or limited number of accounts running automation is harder to detect, but their profitability per person is going to be such, as to become a non-factor in the e...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.28 21:40:06
|
6. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: We have always been talking about bots, I don't care if said person posts on the forum once in a while - Input Automation = botting OK, let's try a simple exercise. In your own words, please define "botting" in the context of M...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 19:45:35
|
7. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Single tower in a C5/6 wormhole with a static C6: 1b +/- depending on type and modules Assuming that, like 99% of wormhole residents of higher-class WHs make their own fuel. 1x Archon: 1.9b, +/- rigs and whatnot 1x Moros: 3.5b, +/- tank or faction...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 19:42:42
|
8. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: It had never been the intention by the game's Founders for the player to simultaneously run 10 accounts comfortably and efficiently, hence why most of us average out at 2.4 accounts since the Dawn of Time. Living in wormholes w...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 18:36:21
|
9. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: PLEX is 5.3bn there. You answered your own query with your own "citation". You see, the current monthly ISK inflows minus sinks is around 25-30 Trillion per month - Why would CCP want to artificially distort the economy and dev...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 18:07:40
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: And we didn't. We always multiboxed. Even the RMT people back in 2004-2008, before the introduction of PLEX, multiboxed. ISBoxer concept is a relatively new addition to the whole industry. True Scotsman fallacy again. See her...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 14:33:26
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: No one is saying that they are bad people in real life. What they do to the game, however, is bad in the long-term for its very health. See Chinese Eve server Serenity. [Citation Needed] The Serenity server has more ISK farmers...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 14:16:15
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: Do you think they would admit to such capabilities, if they had it? That is the most trivial function to attain - VALVe had it in the year 2006. Yeah, think I'll believe a dev over you on this one, especially after having mul...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 13:39:28
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GankYou wrote: AayJay Crendraven wrote: This change did nothing but drive away people who were actually behind their keyboards and playing, not to mention those who alt-tabbed too quickly, or even those who did not use ISBoxer at all. Tell...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 12:31:14
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can't believe I have to spell this out but here goes: Actual botters, the ones who start the botting program and go off to work and let the bot work, didn't give two hoots about this change, as they would have been botting anyways. Most botting p...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.27 12:15:58
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just to sum up my previous post: Quote: ISBoxers cheat by skirting around aggression and wardec mechanics and are 100% safe all the time The first is a serious charge, and corp-hopping to avoid wardecs can be petitioned against. The latter pa...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.25 13:57:36
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: Macro users are included in the statistics for botting by CCP. Source . As per the OP, macroing is commonly referred to as botting. And again, writing a complex macro to automate gameplay is measurably in violation of th...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.25 00:39:10
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: That's either a blatant lie or you really haven't been paying attention. There have been pages of discussion in this topic from disgruntled botters whining that other games allow extensive macro use and EvE will dieGäó with...
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2015.04.24 15:32:42
|
18. WTB Corpses! - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
Bump!
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2013.11.01 02:34:00
|
19. WTB Corpses! - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
bump! need moar corpses!
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2013.10.31 02:31:00
|
20. WTB Corpses! - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
Bump!
- by AayJay Crendraven - at 2013.10.30 05:49:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |