Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
41. [Compilation] The big mission running topic - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
*Throws his support in the general direction.* -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.08.11 22:12:00
|
42. [Issue] Risk/reward of empire - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Better idea: Make all 0.0 into Empire 0.5-07, make all low-sec into Empire 0.8-0.9 and make all Empire 1.0. This is about as reasonable as the OP's idea. Bunch of petty children.... -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.08.10 11:01:00
|
43. [IDEA] Let resident players propose real names for 0.0 systems - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Just change the numbers in either syllables or letters(from leet speak) and add vowels to the results until you can pronounce them. No need to use a complicated process of people proposing names, reviewing them and applying them that'd only resu...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.08.08 11:30:00
|
44. [ISSUE] Proposed changes to missioning and mining - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Worst idea since NGE.... -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.08.07 10:12:00
|
45. [IDEA] REMOVE THE LOCAL - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Unless another means of gathering intelligence is implemented local channel needs to remain in the game. As soon as alternative means become available, I am all for reducing Local chat to grid/station range with only recent speakers showing up. B...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.08.01 12:58:00
|
46. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'll throw my support in here just out of spite. -------- Ideas for: Mining Ships
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.31 10:52:00
|
47. [Issue] Significant Problem With the Current Voting System - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Has my full support, inflating votes with dummies is something akin to election fraud... -------- Ideas for: Mining Ships
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.30 10:52:00
|
48. [Issue] The Pilgrim aka. Amarr's Broken Force Recon - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
-20% effective capacitor for calculations of Energy Vampire drain amounts per level. That would effectively remove the nos nerf from the Pilgrim at lvl 5 (unless I completely fail at grasping the nos functionality, but you get my point). Just to ...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.22 00:55:00
|
49. [proposal] change to Frieghters and Jump Freighters cargo bay`s - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Just use courier contracts. All the stuff of each person in their very own little package. -------- Ideas for: Mining Ships
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.21 15:21:00
|
50. [Issue] The Pilgrim aka. Amarr's Broken Force Recon - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Abrazzar on 20/07/2008 23:47:20 I support increasing the usefulness of the Pilgrim. Maybe instead of it getting a Nos amount bonus it could get a bonus on the relative cap amounts percentages, so that it can suck cap even when it h...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.20 23:47:00
|
51. [Issues] Mining mission being unattractive to the point of pointless - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: LetsDoThis Edited by: LetsDoThis on 20/07/2008 19:32:29 I don't even know why there are mining missions. Miners mine in belts, they don't do missions. Mission runners don't mine. Why are there missions for miners? I'...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.20 19:59:00
|
52. [Issue] Indicate overview icon/color on the icons of locked targets - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yes. This sounds so useful, we definitely need it. -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.20 17:24:00
|
53. [Issues] Mining mission being unattractive to the point of pointless - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yes, mining missions need love. For one they should put back the generic asteroids, maybe limit them in mine-able ore amounts or reduce the time until mining mission expires so that farming those missions does not create too much of an imbalance. ...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.19 23:50:00
|
54. [Suggestion] New logistics ship for projected eccm - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I prefer to leave logistic ships as they are now and make Electronic Support ships a whole new role of its own. New T1 hulls, new T2 ships, both in frigate and cruiser sizes. Make the counter-ewar racially separated as the ewar is currently and no...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.19 16:54:00
|
55. [Suggestion] New logistics ship for projected eccm - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
A Electronic Attack Ship is basically asking for a Electronic Defense Ship. It shouldn't be purely ECCM but instead focus on countering the ewar methods of the opposing faction. It even leaves room for both a T! and T2 version of different sizes, ...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.18 16:10:00
|
56. [Issue] Insuring game integrity (CCP employee transparency) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
If you don't trust CCP to begin with, why would you trust any numbers given out by CCP? This addresses a non-issue, really. Waste of resources. -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.17 14:05:00
|
57. [Issue] Force Recon role bonus - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Nah. Rather add a Deep Space Recon (or something) with a Astrometrics bonus instead of a combat or cyno bonus. That should be about the biggest astrometrics ship around, unless the black ops gets a bastard brother. -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.16 17:54:00
|
58. [Issue] Player Bannings - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
From the looks, Kug peed into CCP's sunday shoes and got slapped into orbit for it. CCP is perfectly within their right to terminate business relations with individuals they have a justified animosity against. I think there are even legal terms ...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.16 13:40:00
|
59. [Idea] New Non-POS structures & Sovereignty - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yes, more stuff in space. And sov could become a adapted version of FW, only that the alliances have to build all the bunkers. The fuel bonus through sov could be transferred to a commodity production with several kinds of facilities, that can be ...
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.16 13:35:00
|
60. Developer Blog or Response Needed: T2 BPO FUTURE? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Well, it'd be nice if CCP could finally put and end to the (speculation based) debate and make their plans for T2 BPOs public. So this issue has my support. -------- Ideas for: Mining
- by Abrazzar - at 2008.07.15 18:51:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |