EVE Search - Posts by Alara IonStorm

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 981-1000 of 9007 for by author Alara IonStorm (1,44 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400
981. Dev blog and disruption ship category - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Scorpii Borealis wrote: Why in battleship class there is only caldari disruption battleship, the Scorpion? Scorpion is currently an EWAR Ship that is very popular in fleets and Gate Camps and what have you. If it is lost for some run of the ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.08 00:05:00
982. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Bouh Revetoile wrote: We are speaking here about a kiting ship trying to kite a kiting ship. No we are speaking about a close range armor blaster boat being better at shield kiting then a purpose build shield kiter while still retaining the ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 23:19:00
983. Why is Bhaalgorn not good for PvE? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] All that talk of NoS giving it a big tank but you don't need that to get the minimum tank. Once you know your ship can survive which any T1 Battleship can do it is all about Dmg projection. A long Web would help but Dmg helps more. Is the Bhaal a... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 21:27:00
984. Amarr is becoming the second drone race - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Making ships for a race that will never use their own racial drones. CCP is sure thinking outside the drone bay. - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 19:50:00
985. Don't you just hate it in EVE when... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: Wait....what are we complaining about? Random things in EVE it seems. Not so much it's all CCP's fault so fix it kind of deal. More don't you hate it when X happens. Like don't you hate it when you accidenta... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 19:45:00
986. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: Nice fit. You skimped a bit on your tank though. Aslo please tell me how you envisage kiting a much faster ship than yourself? Well the Stabber is no faster then current and everyone flies the Rupture as a kiter which is... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 16:33:00
987. Don't you just hate it in EVE when... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I hate when you think you've got someone dead to rights while they are deaggressing on a gate or a station and they make it too the end of the timer in hull. I however love it when I am about to die in hull and at the last second jump or dock. - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 16:16:00
988. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: Please do post a 18km Null-toting blaster fit Thorax. I'm dying to see that. Best I could come up with is 27dps at 18km with heavy ion II's... [Thorax, Null Kite] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 15:50:00
989. Sticky:[Winter] Combat Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Dato Koppla wrote: I'm onboard with these suggestions except for the 7.5% bonus, seems a little unfair that all the other 5 turret combat cruisers get a 5% damage bonus and the Rupture gets a 7.5% bonus, no reason for that, its not like projec... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 02:14:00
990. Sticky:[Winter] Combat Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Gangname Style wrote: Wivabel wrote: Just noticed that the rupture is faster than all the other races Attack cruisers. Seems kinda broke IMO. rupture still king. It is actually now slower then all the races attack cruisers, has the equ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.07 00:03:00
991. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: 2435m/s, 20.4k ehp, 285 dps. About 200 actual DPS with falloff provided perfect tracking. Jason Sirober wrote: Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I NEW Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Infern... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 23:46:00
992. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] xHxHxAOD wrote: who snipes with a ferox People keep focusing on the word Sniper for all things Rail related instead of thinking mid range 50km/ish. I say leave Sniping to the Naga and make the Moa and Ferox good Dmg Dealers in the 40-50km fi... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 20:28:00
993. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: I'm sorry, I must have missed Fozzie's Armor balance anouncement. Could you link it please? http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73530 Quote: Problems on this ship are tied with the shield vers... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 16:44:00
994. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] CCP Fozzie wrote: Consider "Big Moa" to be a fallback if the design doesn't shape up once we start playtesting. You once said the Bantam would take over the Rail Based ship for Frigates before Support Frigates. With the Merlin and Moa no... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 16:31:00
995. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Sinooko wrote: Give the Maelstrom comparable locking range to the Rokh. Also strip shield booster bonus from battleships. Local reps are completely useless in blobs. I think they could do the best of both worlds make one the Shield Boost and... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 16:13:00
996. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: Moar drones! I would like it to look like this descending in increments of 10. Space / BW Thorax 50/50 Omen 40/40 Stabber 30/20 Caracal 20/20 I would prefer even more that it descend by Bandwidth. Thorax 75/50 Omen 40/... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 16:05:00
997. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Just an opinion on the baser hull stats. I think you should + up BS Scan Res a tiny bit. Around 140-165 Standard max skill making them around Battlecruiser Level if they dump in a Sensor Booster but still very slow at locking Frigates and Cruiser... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 15:48:00
998. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Sean Parisi wrote: This is a good observation and I agree. Regardless, do you not agree it would be great to see Caracal fleets with Bellicose support :)? Absolutely I would. Sort of a Heavy Tanked HAM Painter Ship using Rabid Launchers and ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 15:06:00
999. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Sean Parisi wrote: I am liking the changes to the Caracal Me too but I think it is a smidge to close to the faster Bellicose in 2 roles. [quote=Sean Parisi] Heavy Anti-Frigate Platform Close Ranged-HAM Specialist Long Range Kiting HM Speci... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.06 14:55:00
1000. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jason Sirober wrote: If everyone is getting drones on every ship, what is the ones who already has drones getting? A big fat nothing. I wouldn't say that. The Thoraxis getting significant speed, more slots and a real second bonus. The Vexor ... - by Alara IonStorm - at 2012.11.05 23:18:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.