| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1961. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Zerg Overmind wrote: J'Poll wrote: But your name is ruined now... lol wat Haha, reputation on the GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUMS. Achievement unlocked: "Good tears, good thread."
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:15:00
|
1962. The real issues with drones isn't just about PvE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jame Jarl Retief wrote: Acac Sunflyier wrote: C.C.P. approaches drone fixes as a politician will approach clean coal. It's a hot button issue that scores them points when they talk about it at Fan Fest, but nothing really gets done. They've ...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:14:00
|
1963. So, that new 'Immortalize Yourself' thing CCP wants? Luminaire Titan. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We could throw three or more welpfleets at it...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:13:00
|
1964. PVE, Drones, The new AI and You - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Doddy wrote: Jame Jarl Retief wrote: You mean to say that this AI change is a direct blow to L4s (in hi-sec) and makes ratting in null easier? Gasp! We totally did not see this one coming, what with CSM being wall-to-wal...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:12:00
|
1965. Thread trigger words - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some Rando wrote: "Trigger words" are a fallacy. Every thread in GD becomes an argument. Quite an accurate accessment of GD content.
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:11:00
|
1966. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some Rando wrote: Tippia wrote: GǪand to this day, I've never felt that I've gotten a good answer to the question of what supposed highsec issues are missing on the agenda due to the current (or indeed any other) representation. High-sec ...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 19:11:00
|
1967. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
YoYo NickyYo wrote: Perhaps your leadership is doing it wrong? Or you might want to join Test, they'll let you fly anything........ So Test is doing it right, eh. Good to know ...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 18:27:00
|
1968. CCP, you are taking away the meaning of the (Wanted) sign! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Weaselior wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: How are you defining who is innocent? Is an alliance leader that's never fired a shot but orders thousands of players to go out and kill others innocent? How about the industrialist ...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 18:26:00
|
1969. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Great stuff, 5/5 for the thread. Keep up the good work, DecShield !
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 18:24:00
|
1970. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Quote: I wonder who will be switching to tech 1 logistics first.... oh yeah! Quote: We might have some hilarious 't1 doctrines' with the new T1 cruiser changes/logi frigs, but those won't be official doctrines until Vee/...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 13:56:00
|
1971. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
flakeys wrote: Tbh it's not about what zerg did anymore but what the GM's did. He calls it interesting , i'd say that's an understatement.This is the first time i am aware that this type of intervention happends and i can name a good amount of...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 13:53:00
|
1972. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Professor Clio wrote: As for the state of Red's wars: Blue shows itself at war with Red (the corp) but not against the alliance and blues and reds cannot shoot each other (get a concord warning). Red the corp shows i...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 13:45:00
|
1973. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Albert Temper wrote: Yeah and a PLEX to run a Guardian account costs the same as a PLEX to run an Augoror account. 600M. And if you lose 3 Guardians a month you're doing it wrong. 3 guardians a month sounds like some ~gudfites~ were had.
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 13:20:00
|
1974. CCP, you are taking away the meaning of the (Wanted) sign! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wumpscuut Embryodead wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: How are you defining who is innocent? Is an alliance leader that's never fired a shot but orders thousands of players to go out and kill others innocent? How about the industrialist that buil...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 13:18:00
|
1975. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Haha, GMs renamed my corporation to " RvB - RED FederationSTOLEN0 " But somehow I still have the exact same ticker as "RvB - RED Federation". They put both corps "Red Federation Holding Corp" and "Red Federation" back ...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 12:42:00
|
1976. I have figured out how to stop bounties. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hannott Thanos wrote: dexington wrote: pussnheels wrote: dexington wrote: Is it possible to scam a high personal bounty, and manipulate the market price of ships/modules to get a payout by blowing yourself up? didn't that happen whe...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 12:39:00
|
1977. Blue wins! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Zerg Overmind wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: Has ?vB made you an offer for the name back yet? Nope. They have no intention of meeting any ransom demands as a matter of pride. Btw, are any other NCDot corps planning to leave alliance? Are y...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 12:37:00
|
1978. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Only difference the t1 logi will make is that newer players can provide reps sooner. T2 will still be used just as much as last week. It could be a pretty nice advantage. It's odd when people always talk about alpha, but gettin...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 07:25:00
|
1979. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Elzon1 wrote: Yeah, I know... titans destroying entire fleets in seconds However, I'm referencing things like the Remote ECM Burst I and bombs. So, I was talking more about effect based A.O.E then I was damage. I actually love bombs. Ei...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 07:23:00
|
1980. Tech 1 logistics are the straw that broke the Tech Camel's back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Elzon1 wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: Elzon1 wrote: Tech 2 logistics can die just like Tech 1 logistic ships. However, you can afford 5 fully fitted tech 1 logistic cruisers for the price of one scimitar hull. Oh ho, you reveal your hidde...
- by Alavaria Fera - at 2012.12.07 06:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |