Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Why elitistsÆ have an edge. Period. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: La Madrina I definately didn't read anything past the OP, and that was WAY over my head, so here goes: 1) Go play Wow 2) Can I have your stuff? 3) Cry more noob. Erm, and this one too. Come to think of it, THIS might be...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.11 18:32:00
|
102. Why elitistsÆ have an edge. Period. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: MasterEnt All I can say is wow. LOL Sorry you are having a tough time keeping up... CCP.. can we get a remedial version of EVE for this guy... EVE-lite maybe? And Eve-Forum-Lite for this one, please.
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.11 18:29:00
|
103. Metal scraps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They're Trade Goods apparently, though I've never actually seen an NPC buying them. You might try Minmatar stations - they may use them make ships, or buy them thinking they are ships.
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.11 18:18:00
|
104. Stealth bombers? why do they need to cloack - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Don't think modern stealth bomber; think Klingon Bird of Prey.
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.10 18:31:00
|
105. Still the Best - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Geese "honk", ducks "quack". I'm pretty sure that's not a regional dialectical thing either.
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.10 18:26:00
|
106. How blob versus blob evolved into empire space at war - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: "we are here because 0.0 pvp sucks" Blob warfare is easily avoided. So why does 0.0 pvp suck? No Concord & sentry gun issues, either in war or 0.0. You have to search for targets - sometimes they're unprepared, sometimes they outgun...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.10 17:46:00
|
107. Where did the macrominers all go?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Roy Batty68 Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Miss Anthropy Originally by: Dark Shikari All the macroers are doing level 4 courier missions in Loes, and CCP doesn't care. Well, at least they'...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.10 16:05:00
|
108. new role play idea (dungeon master) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! I'd love to see an Eve roleplaying party. On film, of course.
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.09 22:20:00
|
109. Privateer tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, good point there. "Trendmonkey" could also apply to people talking about "natural selection", saying "adapt or die", "go play wow" ... and all that spittle. I'll think of something more specific...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.09 18:18:00
|
110. Privateer tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ki An Originally by: Nighlighted Good you do... Seeing I just had a Mining barge shot out from under me by them .... I'm sorry, but you can't be telling the truth here. We all know the Privateers would never set...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.09 17:53:00
|
111. Privateer tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Redpants I find it funny that there literally must be 20+ threads (if not more) now dealing not just with the Privateers but their station ganking tactics. Yet, the majority of thread posters and those who reply in them act ...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.09 17:43:00
|
112. Charon - you're all saying it wrong. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: monkeyduck Depends on the source, but the Styx is the most widely known. Read the Divine Comedy and other sources, however, and the Acheron is mentioned. If not the whole thing, Inferno is well worth the read . Or "Infer...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.06 22:19:00
|
113. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin My response to your original statement to me was specific to the subject of that sub-thread. You are welcome to reply to other messages in the thread that deal with gameplay mechanics based arguments for or against the...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 21:45:00
|
114. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Originally by: Angellyne First.... The Pot Calling The Kettle Black ( to say something about someone else which is actually true of you yourself ... ) Ah, you thought I meant I wasn't familiar with it...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 20:34:00
|
115. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Talking about the pot calling the kettle black! Interesting approach there: for lack of any substantial arguments to use subjective personal preconceptions about other players as arguments in discussions about gamepla...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 19:50:00
|
116. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin More hair-splitting One could be insulted by just about anything, I suppose. In this instance, "unimaginative" means lacking the creativity to deal with Local any way other than logging out. "Win at any cost" mea...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 18:56:00
|
117. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Originally by: Angellyne Originally by: Razin Speak for your own memory. Here's the link posted by Plutoinum with relevant CCP responses: CCP: Why is a Log-on Trap not an Exploit? So everybody's r...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 18:27:00
|
118. The Golden Rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maam As well as your points, it simply doesn't work. I think CCP have a policy of not responding to "directly addressed" thread titles. Show me a single posting with "Devs Please Read" etc. in the title that actually gets ...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 18:11:00
|
119. The Golden Rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The golden rule: "Treat others as you want to be treated." So is your title inappropriate, or are you wanting to be called stupid?
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 17:49:00
|
120. Log On Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Speak for your own memory. Here's the link posted by Plutoinum with relevant CCP responses: CCP: Why is a Log-on Trap not an Exploit? So everybody's right. From that thread: "It stopped being an exploit when..." ...
- by Angellyne - at 2007.04.05 17:37:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |