EVE Search - Posts by Ankhesentapemkah

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-7 of 7 for by author Ankhesentapemkah (0,13 seconds)

Pages: [1]
1. Measures to make empire ganking a more "fair" to all - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Efdi Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Originally by: KingOzar CONCORD is for punishment, not protection. Funny how PEND does the time, though, and the offender goes off scott-free. We're not asking for pro... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.04.24 00:33:00
2. Measures to make empire ganking a more "fair" to all - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Originally by: KingOzar CONCORD is for punishment, not protection. Funny how PEND does the time, though, and the offender goes off scott-free. We're not asking for protection, we're just making sure the offender actually gets the punis... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.04.23 23:12:00
3. Measures to make empire ganking a more "fair" to all - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Ankhesentapemkah on 23/04/2008 22:36:05 Originally by: Marec Lupus snip, need characters Some good points even though I do not agree with all. A few are also on my CSM campaign website, actually, as suicide ganking and h... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.04.23 22:33:00
4. idea related to: standings, mission running/agents, skills - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I've written this issue down on my list of things I need to bring up once I've been appointed as CSM. I think a lot of the ideas brought up show promise, and will surely refer to them. --- Consider voting for me in the CSM elections. I invite you... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.04.22 08:24:00
5. Low Sec Profitabilty - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Increasing low-sec rewards is one of my CSM campaign points. The rewards for mission-running should be increased, and the ore can definately use some improvements as well. I personally think that people should have some encouragement to hop over... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.04.14 14:23:00
6. Self Destructing - Rebalancing? - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Ankhesentapemkah on 14/03/2008 11:54:11 Originally by: Endless Subversion Edited by: Endless Subversion on 13/03/2008 23:37:16 Originally by: Mae West If someone knows they're not going to win and doesn't want th... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.03.14 11:54:00
7. idea related to: standings, mission running/agents, skills - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I was actually thinking of something myself and reading the idea forum, and stumbled across your thread, which is more complex than I had in mind. I support implementation of these skills, especially the ones that lower standing loss from kills a... - by Ankhesentapemkah - at 2008.02.25 21:13:00
Pages: [1]
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.