Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. UK Census religion question - Amarrian? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 16/03/2011 18:42:01 Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 16/03/2011 15:37:10 http://census-campaign.org.uk/ http://census-campaign.org.uk/what-is-happening/ http://census-campaign.org.uk/faq/...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.03.16 18:41:00
|
2. New Dev Blog: Reimbursement policy updated - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 12/03/2011 16:16:15 Quote: 3. Any assets sold to another player will not be returned to the original owner; however, any ISK gained from the sale may be transferred to the original owner of the items instead on ...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.03.12 16:16:00
|
3. New Blog: Planetary Interaction changes brought with Incursion 1.1.0 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
*Bump A dev response to the above posts proposing fixes for PI would be appreciated. Why are you Devs afraid to respond? Argonaught. ------------------------------------------------ Coming soon or never.sig
- by Argonaught - at 2011.02.26 21:32:00
|
4. PI: Link Power Consumption - in Science and Industry [original thread]
It would also be nice if when viewing a planet it zoomed in more on larger planets so you could have the exact same setup as you do on smaller ones. Also make the icons for placing structures smaller when doing them on larger sized planets. Argo...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.02.05 11:30:00
|
5. My solution to the P0 -> P1 part of PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Miko Li - If one launchpad has no stockpile, would it be useful to export excess P0 to custom office & import it to the other one? Comments? For that one there is one way to do it without using Customs but requires a f...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.31 16:17:00
|
6. A total letdown of new PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 30/01/2011 04:12:47 Sokrates, I have the same issues with blue showing up where a red spot used to be the night before and I'm in a .1 system :( I'm just really annoyed at ccp devs atm as I was one of the many who di...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.30 04:12:00
|
7. A total letdown of new PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 30/01/2011 02:19:23 Originally by: Zaerlorth Maelkor Holy crap there's alot of whining going on here. Fact is if you rethink your whole PI setup instead of trying to recreate what you had before you can make as...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.30 02:19:00
|
8. New Blog: Planetary Interaction changes brought with Incursion 1.1.0 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Just admit it, you f**ked up PI and now are trying to claim it was so it could be more interactive, what a load of old arse. That nerf bat needs to be re-purposed and used on PI Devs heads instead of features in EVE. Argo. ---------------...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.29 02:06:00
|
9. EVE Online: Incursion 1.1.2 Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 28/01/2011 17:08:06 PI is still borked, they didn't fix routing from ecu to storage. http://oi56.tinypic.com/110azxx.jpg 29964 units should be routed as 7491 x 4 cycles = 29964 Whats actually being routed is 9909 ...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.28 17:07:00
|
10. EVE Online: Incursion 1.1.2 Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
PI is still borked, they didn't fix routing from ecu to storage. 29964 units should be routed as 7491 x 4 cycles = 29964 Whats actually being routed is 9909 a routing loss of 20055 units (Note: Items being routed are done once an hour as route...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.27 17:12:00
|
11. Extraction output units/hr for PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 27/01/2011 17:01:31 PI is still borked, they didn't fix routing from ecu to storage. 29964 units should be routed as 7491 x 4 cycles = 29964 Whats actually being routed is 9909 a routing loss of 20055 units (Note: ...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.27 17:00:00
|
12. No subject - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 27/01/2011 00:21:20 opps, sry pls delete ------------------------------------------------ Coming soon or never.sig
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.27 00:21:00
|
13. Corp Standings Issue (trying to set up High Sec POS) - HELP - in Science and Industry [original thread]
If your the only one in the corp then corp stands are based on your standings before skills alter them. So if your 8+ with a faction your corp will be that also. HTH Argo. ------------------------------------------------ Coming soon or never.sig
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.27 00:12:00
|
14. EVE Online: Incursion 1.1.2 to be deployed Thursday, January 27, 2011 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist EVE Online Incursion 1.1.2 will be deployed Thursday, January 27, 2011. Incursion 1.1.2 includes several fixes to issues introduced by Incursion 1.1.0. The deployment process will begin at 10:00 UTC and is expe...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.26 21:09:00
|
15. Barren P.I Issue - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Funesta Originally by: Cassina Lemour Wait until the cycle is delivered, you'll get 10% of what you expect then, ECU are unremitting broken. This isn't true. My planets have thus far all delivered as expected an...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.25 20:03:00
|
16. PI - use graph or output numbers for estimates? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Quetazoid the graph peak as it 'scales' down a notch, as yoiu are removing less mats. unless u have planetology (inc adv planetology) skills 5/5 then you will get incorrect readings from the initial survey graph. Even w...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.24 14:12:00
|
17. Planetology skills and PI - the numbers? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I have 5/5 and before the change in PI they were kinda useful. Since the update in PI 5/5 means nothing as all the numbers in PI are off and you still get massive inconsistencies during extractor placement/installing program/submitting changes and...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.24 14:07:00
|
18. CCP ON VACATION? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Argonaught on 24/01/2011 13:52:52 Originally by: Lledrith Originally by: Tiralys I have yet to see any response from someone on the dev team or even asssociated with ccp. they really dont have to give you or ot...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.24 13:52:00
|
19. Elite Planetary Command Centers need to be more elite. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 Elite need to be more elite for the extra training time we put in to be able to use them. Argo. ------------------------------------------------ Coming soon or never.sig
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.24 13:35:00
|
20. High Sec WH Space, why not? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ah, didn't know bots were all that advanced :S Just thought it would be nice way of expanding High sec without adding extra regions for it. High sec is a tad more congested in certain hub areas these days and figured high sec WH areas wouldn't b...
- by Argonaught - at 2011.01.23 13:07:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |