Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
21. Guestimate How Much Suicide Gank You Would Need? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
i'm getting 305k BEFORE links and overheat. So, bring firepower for 350k. 45 'nados and you solved it!
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.18 00:46:00
|
22. EVE Online ON a Asus G71G-Q1? - ok I need imput here fellow space pilots! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
2fps would work okay with EVE, since server ticks at 1 second.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.18 00:41:00
|
23. CCP, Get rid of Moon Goo so Goons and other large alliances have to work for the... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wait, Wait, wait. There is NOTHING wrong with Goo being that valuable. The only mere problem is that there is one big bad bottleneck good (Technetium) and the others aren't worth jack ****. Rebalance the bottleneck, and all is good. If you factor ...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.17 19:55:00
|
24. Need help from the GD class of 2012 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In this thread, the expression "trolls trolling trolls" reached a value very near to it's perfection.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.17 19:37:00
|
25. Looking for a sci fi book - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Foundation cycle by Isaac Asimov.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.12 21:42:00
|
26. Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Now, not for anything, but... A mackinaw WOULD warp out if locked. Locking makes a very annoying sound, it's hard to miss. Warping in doesn't. Hardly applies to same-name things and warping one by one from a single pack, but still.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.12 01:48:00
|
27. Some thoughts on risk vs reward - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i do not think any pvp crowd has ever initiated a talk on nerfing trading and manufacturing. Your point is moot.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.10 15:45:00
|
28. IF CCP supported RMT how would it work. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rockius wrote: Soulpirate wrote: They should remove PLEX and just stick with AUR. GTC gets converted to Aurum, that Aurum then can be used to purchase anything you want at the NeX including game time blocks of various sizes. 1 week, 1 month...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.10 15:39:00
|
29. Mining v. Suicide Ganking: The Solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katalci wrote: AureoBroker wrote: While i hold no hope about honorable engagements and such (it's part of the EVE beauty having the lack of those), it's SUPPLY DISRUPTION, which would be qualified under "market" and not under "pvp". You're e...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.10 15:21:00
|
30. EVE Does Nothing to Assist the Blind or Visually Impaired - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
2/10 would not read again
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.09 23:31:00
|
31. Burn Jita unrealistic and inconsistent - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Even though it is in the backyard of Caldari Prime, no damage was intended or perpetrated by goons or any individual partecipating in Burn Jita to State property. So no, Caldari should hardly break a sweat. Caldari prime is next door, yes, but it'...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.09 21:22:00
|
32. Mining v. Suicide Ganking: The Solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: yes they should make concord chance-based so that there's "risk" by worthless pubbie standards CONCORD can be sweeped up (or annulled) when the system makes more sense. That means: Hulks being tough enough to need a proper assau...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.09 12:32:00
|
33. Mining v. Suicide Ganking: The Solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
While i hold no hope about honorable engagements and such (it's part of the EVE beauty having the lack of those), it's SUPPLY DISRUPTION, which would be qualified under "market" and not under "pvp". You're engaging in an activity which is VERY aki...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.09 09:40:00
|
34. Mining v. Suicide Ganking: The Solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lady Spank wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: I like the idea, but there is no kill mails for suicide ganking drones. So you will never get any real support due to that. Make no mistake. They do not suicide gank to deal with bots or any of that. It i...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.08 20:55:00
|
35. Inferno - a bit gimped? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Please people, you're taking someone who ends all his posts with "lol" seriously? (or, actually, were - luckyly no one's doing that by page 3!) Let the idiots lay in the own idiocy. Missiles are a feature enough, TBH. Also seems we're getting FW i...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.08 20:44:00
|
36. Why are miners more important than... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Shooting you actually carries consequences, though.
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.07 20:23:00
|
37. A Suicide Gankers guide to keeping your Hulk off a killmail. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unless you're, indeed, mining in Amarr during hulkageddon, you'll hardly ever go over a gank every 50 hours of mining. That makes tanking the hulk antieconomic, and by that reason bad advice, that nevertheless gets thrown around, by the same peopl...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.07 19:33:00
|
38. A Suicide Gankers guide to keeping your Hulk off a killmail. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i do not understand two categories: Failing PVPers (because seriously, how serious can you be at suicide ganking?) giving failed advice in economics; Risk adverse miners actually following it. Moving ore, proven you can refine it (or can get someo...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.07 19:20:00
|
39. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Actions have consequences. Upon attacking anything a single time in hisec, you should be declared a public criminal, and unable to get back without going GREAT extents, not as a byproduct of ratting. That means: - On police hunting system. - Unabl...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.06 18:33:00
|
40. Dear Miners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Risk versus Reward Mining exposes the player to higher risk than any other hisec activity, and has the lower reward. Balanced? ... the real miner's tear is "why aren't L4s runners gankable like us". What would you whine for if a missioning Raven w...
- by AureoBroker - at 2012.05.06 16:29:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |