EVE Search - Posts by Bane Glorious

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 161-180 of 418 for by author Bane Glorious (0,13 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20
161. CSM missing transcripts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] nice touch making darius the black guy by the way - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.12 00:48:00
162. CSM missing transcripts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] heh - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.12 00:46:00
163. PAINT AND PAINT SCHEME - in Assembly Hall [original thread] pity support - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.11 05:16:00
164. [Issue] Specific Adjustments to 0.0 Sovereignty Combat - in Assembly Hall [original thread] 1 and 2 I can support, but 3 is going overboard. There are more conventional (and technically feasible) ways to nerf cynojammers than that which will be more balanced for both attacker and defender anyway. - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.05 23:48:00
165. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Fahtim Meidires It depends on if they vote high or low. It depends on how they prioritize it. So far all that's decided is if it's on the list, not where on the list. Exactly. What ... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 23:37:00
166. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Mutabae Edited by: Mutabae on 04/08/2008 22:02:29 Originally by: Bane Glorious Anybody who doesn't see the genius of this idea clearly lacks the imagination to realize it's potential. These same people probably w... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 22:04:00
167. CSM Formal Meeting 8. Sunday 3rd August. 16:00 hours Eve Time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] RuleOfTheBone: The CSM is not primarily for acting as CCP's internal affairs because that was what all the commotion was about a year to a year and a half ago. Now, nobody is really worried about developer corruption, and the commotion is about g... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 22:03:00
168. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Mutabae Originally by: Wendat Huron Leave it to a goon to make a mockery of the CSM. Surprise surprise, it made it on the agenda! Yet, they shelved discussion on the scrambler/web changes to 'some point in the f... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 21:59:00
169. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Anybody who doesn't see the genius of this idea clearly lacks the imagination to realize it's potential. These same people probably would have poo-pooed steamboats, trains, and telephones were they alive centuries ago. - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 21:47:00
170. CSM Formal Meeting 8. Sunday 3rd August. 16:00 hours Eve Time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Sakura Nihil I'd just like to thank Bane, Darius, Tusko, and Inanna for screwing the population over and refusing to comment on an ongoing change in gameplay that will affect everyone. Especially when you know this is just g... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.04 01:40:00
171. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Le Skunk Originally by: Bane Glorious This idea passed with a unanimous grand slam, 8-0. Yes thanks for ignoring the biggest supported thread and pushing this one through. SKUNK - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.03 20:47:00
172. [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments - in Assembly Hall [original thread] This idea passed with a unanimous grand slam, 8-0. - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.08.03 20:15:00
173. [Issue] Large Artillery and Minmatar Battleships - in Assembly Hall [original thread] You missed this thread: http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=782070 - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 22:23:00
174. [Proposal]Give maller a proper role - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Okay, the Maller sucks, I agree, but your idea is seriously appallingly bad. Like, nightmarish. I'll give you a thumbs up, but jesus, I'm glad you're not the one calling the shots at CCP. - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 19:37:00
175. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: ElanMorin6 Edited by: ElanMorin6 on 31/07/2008 18:37:18 Ugh. CCP has enough problems coming up with sweeping changes on their own. It rarely works out. As much as it might bore the Lead Developer, small incremental chang... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 19:26:00
176. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Kelsin I think this proposal just needs a clearer mission statement as the initial writeup in the OP is vague, and then it quickly gets into very detailed specifics and you have to really dig to figure out what exactly the p... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 17:15:00
177. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Kelsin Just to be clear, is this the part that would be escalated? There are several different ideas brought up in your writeup, but it isn't completely clear which ones would be the ones proposed to CCP if this passes. ... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 14:32:00
178. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] It could be the case that they may have to revisit the ewar immunity of motherships, retaining their immunity to conventional warp scramblers but removing the immunity to damps, ECM, and webs, since otherwise there is no weak link in the chain to ... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 04:21:00
179. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] The idea behind the "5-fighter nerf" was that it was meant to incentivize carriers repairing the support instead of just other carriers. Only the support can use the fighters, and if the support dies, then the fleet has lost their effective total ... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 04:20:00
180. [Issue] Discuss Zulupark's carrier dev blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Admittance: My ideas for how to modify fighter damage to allow a specialized carrier to do significantly more damage than current need some work. People want to be able to do more damage with fighters if they occupy all of their highslots with d... - by Bane Glorious - at 2008.07.31 04:19:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.