| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
101. [CSM9] And now I present to you... - in Wormholes [original thread]
If you do not vote for wormhole candidates, I will put together a coaltion and burn your wormhole to the ground. I am just kidding.. Maybe..
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.08 21:41:00
|
102. Remove stargates and high sec! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
To the OP,: Being a good troll is an art. As it stands, you have about as much artistic skill as a guy holding a paintbrush while having a seizure. 0/10.
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.08 17:15:00
|
103. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Or maybe pre Odyssey he kept probes out and kept and eye on incoming sigs, hence limiting his losses. You know, working for intel and the such, which is how it should be. Also, this changes more than the just pve now. With this change, I could ef...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.08 12:48:00
|
104. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
The Cue wrote: If the pulsar effect is so game breaking, it seems pretty simple to tone the cap down for another bonus, maybe something that doesn't exist in the variable effects yet? How about this: Cap recharge becomes: Capacitor recharge -5...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.06 04:10:00
|
105. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
I reposted =P
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.06 00:38:00
|
106. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
EDIT
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.06 00:25:00
|
107. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Two step wrote: Fine with me. My issue is that killing things like this 44 BILLION ISK carrier took 3 dreads, 3 BSes and 24 T3s quite a while. Pimped out Chimeras in Pulsars are basically immune to neuts, unless you have a bunch of bhaals, a...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.06 00:04:00
|
108. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Take away the cap bonus but give us shield resists, on top of the buffer bonus. ^_^
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 23:41:00
|
109. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
James Arget wrote: So, I just got CCP Fozzie on the line to make sure that yes, I was correct in what was being discussed in the minutes. So, I'll take this from the top, in order to avoid confusion. From ye olden days of command links, some s...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 21:59:00
|
110. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
In fairness, a chimera getting boosts in a pulsar would be beyond OP. Same in a cata. My question is do caps really need to get boosts to repping? I thought that was why I trained for t2 triage.
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 20:03:00
|
111. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
A lot of people simply will not reship to fight in a different type of wormhole. Even if they reduce the Pulsar's cap bonus, those same people still won't jump in. This is something I can't understand myself, as I love having to fly something diff...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 18:08:00
|
112. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
[quote=Mike Voidstar] For me personally, it matters very little. I've been to Nullsec, and I didn't care for the politics. So afk cloakers and that sort of thing do not really bother me from my comfortable station over in Aunia. The Cyno is only ...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 18:03:00
|
113. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just out of curiosity, if cloaked ships were unable to fit cynos, would that make it better for you Mike?
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 17:00:00
|
114. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
James Arget wrote: Which is funny, because it says right there why the change is even on the table. Right now capital shield boosters are unaffected by shield command links. During the command ship and boosting rebalance, CCP Fozzie planned t...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 16:51:00
|
115. So, CSM 8 Candidates.... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: All systems need to be nerfed so I never have to leave my armor t3 Fixed to what you are actually saying
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 16:24:00
|
116. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ruining wormhole space for thousands of pilots to fix a non problem in null for a handful of people. Fantastic thinking lol
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.05 11:43:00
|
117. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Changing the very essence of wormhole simply to appease a few upset bears shows the extreme lack of actual thinking as it pertains to nerfing cloaks.
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.04 22:46:00
|
118. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cloak fitted ships die all the time, so I don't understand how you can say there is no counter
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.04 22:23:00
|
119. Expel member at next down time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The "abuse" from a member isn't the issue for me. I just think it doesn't make sense to have to be docked up to remove someone. If a CEO wants someone gone, they should be able to do it regardless of where the person is in space.
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.04 22:00:00
|
120. A legitimate Discussion and Ideas on Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Voidstar wrote: Cloaks do not balance local. Local is balanced on its own, only player effort makes it powerful, both in proactively clearing systems of hostiles and in getting clear so that the combat wings can do that. There is no ef...
- by Bane Nucleus - at 2014.04.04 21:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |