Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Dip PotatoChip wrote: Don't touch fighters please :( the new Chimera model is so cool it's **** the took a powerful sturdy looking ship and made it look fragile and awkward chimera - looks great phoenix - sho...
- by Benevolant George - at 2017.02.25 20:03:06
|
2. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Quote: Regarding your Fighters -> Heavy Drones comparison...the best ships I can think of (someone correct me here) to utilize heavy drones (arguably the only ones worth using) are: Rattlesnake Eos Myrmadon Prophecy (?) Ishtar VNI Every s...
- by Benevolant George - at 2017.02.25 19:58:56
|
3. Announcement:EVE Online: Ascension - General feedback (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Pulse Activated Nexus Invulnerability Core bpo doesnt appeared to be seeded?
- by Benevolant George - at 2016.11.15 13:18:31
|
4. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
MuHckuu MoHaX wrote: New full API KEY Access Mask: 4294967295 But seems you need extend variable type for it: Error Screen '4294967295' is not a valid interger value. hey man read up a few posts to my earlier reply (on the same page o...
- by Benevolant George - at 2016.07.25 20:38:12
|
5. Saving fittings for Carriers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hi CCP, Is there a plan to fix the issue where the fittings cant save fighters for carrier fits? Its bit irritating. BG
- by Benevolant George - at 2016.06.30 11:13:12
|
6. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Cyclone Organic wrote: Lara Agnon wrote: iSupport Sodom wrote: Anyone else getting the "'4294967295' is not a valid integer value" error when adding a new API? My guess is everyone gets this message with API key ids that are not 32-bit...
- by Benevolant George - at 2016.06.30 08:14:58
|
7. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
:o \o/ :-( I am having mixed emotions about this, maybe its time to go outside?
- by Benevolant George - at 2015.07.15 21:12:36
|
8. WTB 60 day time codes (7) - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
Please quote best price online now
- by Benevolant George - at 2015.07.14 21:13:17
|
9. Sticky:EVE Launcher update on May 21, 2013 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You have made us all very aware that this game has been going 10 years, but you still seem unable to deploy an update or patch without mistakes/delays or other mistakes occurring. Why do you not thoroughly test these prior to release? Why 10 years...
- by Benevolant George - at 2013.05.21 18:00:00
|
10. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
as ive previously said thanks for all the points of view, plenty for me to look more closely at =)
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.28 12:14:00
|
11. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
see aside from anything else this has been a perfectly rational discussion, ive certainly got a few things to investigate further, and ive also recieved constructive opinons regarding this whole area. thanks =)
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.27 10:58:00
|
12. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
beor oranes wrote: Please no, god please no. The last one has caused years of arguments, rage and tears. Even CCP said that that the T2 lottery was a bad idea (which is why they got rid of it). T2 BPO's don't make a whole lot of difference to...
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.27 05:31:00
|
13. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Well i ASSUME one reason that t2 ships are so exspensive is down to the very expensive parts to manufacture them, especially when ppl are forced to use -4 me level bpcs (giving a 70% wastage factor!!!) for example, when i look at available t2 bpcs...
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.27 01:22:00
|
14. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
im sure its possible to discuss without flames..... wqhy do u think it shoudnt happen or wont happen? (at least back your staatement up with reasoning......)
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.26 16:43:00
|
15. t2 lottery - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Does anyone else think its about time they did another one oof these? i bring it up for a few reasons: 1) rising t2 prices (specifically ships) 2) invention bpcs being very expensive to rival the me/pe of a bpo. 3) surely new people coming into ...
- by Benevolant George - at 2011.09.26 15:40:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |