Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
1. Test Alliance Joining Caldari FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: I'm sure that iHUB bashes are gonna be a lot more exciting in the near future. This, if there was able to have a dedcated Ihub bash group, FW would be different and I think more people would like it. Busting an IHub in F...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.10.11 19:35:00
|
2. FW Stale Mate - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Excuse me. Bolsterbomb your contract specifically prohibits you from returning to Caldari FW. If you return to Caldari FW you will no longer receive your militia pension. (hopefully the peeps will think I'm serious and allow...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.10.04 21:12:00
|
3. FW Stale Mate - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Chessur wrote: BolsterBomb wrote: Hey All, Possibly coming back into eve and as many know I am a big FW pilot. I like the idea of flying BC and below and getting good fights rather then "primary and die" fights. As you already know Sov in ...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.09.30 20:12:00
|
4. FW Stale Mate - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hey All, Possibly coming back into eve and as many know I am a big FW pilot. I like the idea of flying BC and below and getting good fights rather then "primary and die" fights. As you already know Sov in FW is pretty pointless and most FW folks...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.09.30 19:51:00
|
5. Gallente or Caldari FW? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Deen Wispa wrote: Oh yeah. Bolster is back to revive the Caldari! What makes you think ill play for calmil this time? Why not amar?
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.09.28 23:28:00
|
6. Gallente or Caldari FW? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Ralina Foley wrote: For a more useful answer, that really depends. Currently, the Gallente are winning, in terms of FW points and systems, as well as any killboard statistics you can think to pull up, mostly. There are of course entities on bot...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2013.09.28 22:49:00
|
7. Faction Warfare - Where has everybody gone ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
planetside 2 11/20 launch
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.11.08 14:04:00
|
8. Faction Warfare - Same As It Ever Was - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Poetic Stanziel wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Same with kills. Hans does propose that kills receive all LP at the T5 multiplier, no matter what level of warzone control your faction is at. Wh...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.30 21:09:00
|
9. VIDEO: FW, "I'm not dead yet!" - Some Small Gang PVP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
nice I love those fleets, especially when you can string a bunch of noobs out. The FC should have known immediately what was going on and just ignored it. The only problem I have with nano/arty fleets is you have to be able to kill quickly or you...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.29 18:46:00
|
10. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
JAF Anders wrote: BolsterBomb wrote: nah Frog Steamers is such a good name, besides we are making our own fun.. It's my opinion that "Ex-Ex-Luminaire General" has a bit of a ring to it (and you can keep the "Traitor" bit, too), and I sup...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.26 13:20:00
|
11. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Squatdog wrote: Quote: The 3 biggest alliances in Cal Mil is Happy Endings ~ 300 members Kraken ~ 300 members Templis Dragonaors ~ 200 members All of whom WAR DEC EACHOTHER . yea actually we war deced an alliance, one of the c...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.25 22:33:00
|
12. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
JAF Anders wrote: BolsterBomb wrote: It is funny how people would rather spin buttons then actually fight...... You sure you don't want to come back to Gallente? nah Frog Steamers is such a good name, besides we are making our own f...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.25 22:27:00
|
13. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Deen Wispa wrote: Squatdog wrote: The reason they couldn't 'keep up the same momentum' is that Gallente have literally spent all day frantically decontesting no less than FORTY-EIGHT of the 52 remaining vulnerable systems. Virtually all...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.25 21:46:00
|
14. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Major Killz wrote: CCP has shown favoritism to factional warfare milltias who are "losing". However, I'm not sure what they were losing. System control never mattered back then, untill the resent isk printing machine. Factional warfare was ment...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.24 15:44:00
|
15. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mjolnir Gost wrote: Megos Adriano wrote: Also, are people ITFs really stupid enough to believe that CCP is baised in favor of either faction (Gal/Min vs Cal/Amarr)? in that CCP implemented this in a half-assed, rushed and ******** way. ...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.23 19:09:00
|
16. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: BolsterBomb wrote: As much as I really dont care (and I really dont, Im happy the changes are rolling "cooperation" back to the old ways. The statement above is frivolous. The Gals screwed them selves by flipping early. ...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.23 16:03:00
|
17. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Mjolnir Gost wrote: Basically what we are "mad" about is that we were not allowed sufficient time to cap our systems, Well then we would be mad that we weren't able to counter cap your capped systems. Yada, yada, yada. ...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.23 15:55:00
|
18. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mjolnir Gost wrote: Deen Wispa wrote: This thread. It has potential. Bump BTW Mjolnir- Bolsterbomb was approached by CCP and his views were considered. There was a Skype conference call which included Bolster, Chatgris, myself, XG, Hans, Mi...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.23 15:24:00
|
19. FW Corp Decs FW Corp Standing Question - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
David Campbell wrote: Are you guys turning on each other ??? That could be fun. On the other hand, if the target is Damar's corp, I'm sure you'll find a lot of gal mil corps ready to join the fight :D Well I am a spy you know, one that rele...
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.12 02:54:00
|
20. FW Corp Decs FW Corp Standing Question - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
If a FW corp decs another FW corp. Does either corp lose standing during the war when killing opposing pilots?
- by BolsterBomb - at 2012.10.10 22:12:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |