Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Announcement:119.2 - Issues (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
well at least it is letting you guys log in. All 4 of my accounts now say "there is a problem with your account" when I try to log in.
- by Bowbndr - at 2017.02.17 11:36:39
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ok let me get this straight. Off grid mining boosts are so disruptive to game play you have to patch the game for it , but in 5 years you cant figure out how to fix cloaky camping??? And you STILL want everyo e to believe your not Targeting the m...
- by Bowbndr - at 2016.09.29 02:33:52
|
3. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
While I donGÇÖt think that this latest round of changes will be the GÇ£finalGÇ¥ nail in CCPGÇÖs coffin, I do wonder how much longer this game can survive the dumbing down of a game that, when I first started playing back in 2010, was designed to b...
- by Bowbndr - at 2016.09.01 01:06:15
|
4. New NPC capitals. No wreck, no module loot :( - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Once again CCP goes off the deep end when they needed to step back and think about it before doing it. I could see the point of adding NPC capitals, but to drop them on a lone ratter or a mining vessel in a belt? Sounds like CCP is pushing the s...
- by Bowbndr - at 2016.05.16 09:19:53
|
5. Ratting Post-Citadel - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
sorry felt I should clairtify. SO let me see if I get this right. CCP being the makers of the biggest sandbox game out there has decided in their infinite STYUPIDITY that every person corp and alliance that already gets hit hard by the incursions ...
- by Bowbndr - at 2016.04.29 04:51:37
|
6. Ratting Post-Citadel - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
after seeing one of the new Capitol rats, it seams fairly clear that CCP is again tringing to FORCE everyone out of ratting except the Big groups that can take down these massive capitols. WAY TO GO CCP kill another way for the smaller groups to...
- by Bowbndr - at 2016.04.29 04:42:33
|
7. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Bowbndr wrote: Im not saying eve is going to die, far from it. WOW is about the most brain dead game I know and it makes a killing, but making eve in to a space based WOW is going to do nothing to "help" it either, ot...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.18 08:42:30
|
8. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ok let me sum this up so that I can make my point a little clearer. everyone keep acting like N3 and Goons giving up their space is this big void, but in reality what fozzy sov dose is make it so they don't have to pay a sov bill to extort those t...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.18 05:44:59
|
9. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Bowbndr wrote: The problem for doing it now is that they would have to pay sov bill for any systems they take. Under the new system they can kill systems for other groups in the game with next to no risk on their part...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.18 05:35:27
|
10. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Bowbndr wrote: Dropping a few regions and "announcing" the end of the CFC mean nothing as long as CCP allowes them to keep everyone else from holding sov. the only thing Fozzy's new goonsov will do is make it so they ...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.17 23:49:05
|
11. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Bowbndr wrote: Rowells wrote: Bowbndr wrote: so what your doing is making it so that your large Goon and CFC friends can just cover all of null sec because they keep people online and running this link, While small...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.17 23:46:20
|
12. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Bowbndr wrote: Dropping a few regions and "announcing" the end of the CFC mean nothing as long as CCP allowes them to keep everyone else from holding sov. the only thing Fozzy's new goonsov will do is make it so they ...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.17 20:02:11
|
13. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bowbndr wrote: so what your doing is making it so that your large Goon and CFC friends can just cover all of null sec because they keep people online and running this link, While smaller groups will be pushed out of null completely because they...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.17 05:02:09
|
14. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Bowbndr wrote: so what your doing is making it so that your large Goon and CFC friends can just cover all of null sec because they keep people online and running this link, While smaller groups will be pushed out of null compl...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.17 04:59:36
|
15. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
[quote=John Sharp This new process does require you to be active to defend, but seems a bit favored to the attackers. Especially those not interested in your space or structures, just easy kills. Risk vs Reward is somewhat replaced by Work vs Rewa...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.16 05:52:35
|
16. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: John Sharp wrote: ... This new process does require you to be active to defend, but seems a bit favored to the attackers. Especially those not interested in your space or structures, just ...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.16 05:39:34
|
17. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
so what your doing is making it so that your large Goon and CFC friends can just cover all of null sec because they keep people online and running this link, While smaller groups will be pushed out of null completely because they don't have the ma...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.16 05:32:49
|
18. GOONS Are A Joke - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
the short answer to the OP is that CCP is rapidly making Goons the only null sec holders and their fore you will have to rent from goons to be in nullsec. All these changes and the only groups that is totally unaffected is goons. CCP should relay...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.16 05:21:22
|
19. I still have questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DaReaper wrote: Bowbndr wrote: Code dose this daily and CCP calls it a valid game tactic. Quote: You may not do anything that interferes with the ability of other EVE Online subscribers to enjoy the game or web site in accordance with ...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.07 16:01:37
|
20. I still have questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Code dose this daily and CCP calls it a valid game tactic. [/quote] Quote: You may not do anything that interferes with the ability of other EVE Online subscribers to enjoy the game or web site in accordance with its rules. This includes, but i...
- by Bowbndr - at 2015.04.07 15:46:41
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |