EVE Search - Posts by CCP Greyscale

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 41-60 of 1218 for by author CCP Greyscale (0,24 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60
41. Sticky:Dev Blog: Happy Safe Fun Time! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] On persisting the safety button setting: it's something we were hoping to get into this release but didn't quite have time. I can't give any kind of estimate on if/when it will happen right now because we're in the final stages of release prep and... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.27 21:51:00
42. Sticky:Dev Blog: Happy Safe Fun Time! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Eli Green wrote: Jing Xin wrote: I hope safety setting is persistent through docking, jumping, logging off. If it constantly defaults to green, some people will be seriously annoyed. currently unless it has changed since last week it is ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.27 15:54:00
43. Sticky:Dev Blog: Happy Safe Fun Time! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Dersen Lowery wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Unsafe logoff: you close the client, your ship turns off its modules, emergency-warps, sits in space for a minute and then disappears Safe logoff: you hit safe logoff, your ship sits in space ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.27 15:44:00
44. Sticky:Dev Blog: Happy Safe Fun Time! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Danny theDog wrote: Seems cool but still alot of 'major' issues that could've been looked at instead of this, like cloaky campers (fair enough they exist blah blah but they shouldn't be allowed to do it afk) how boring mining is, how ICE should... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.27 15:43:00
45. Sticky:Dev Blog: Happy Safe Fun Time! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Graygor wrote: Now that I think about it this isn't nannying. You aren't telling us not to climb trees, more that if you get hurt don't come crying to us. This is pretty much how I see it too: we're not saying you can't put your fingers in... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.27 15:33:00
46. Sec hit severity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] We've looked at the numbers again and we're halving the size of the hit for aggressing another ship. It's not a perfect system in that this change is simultaneously making it harder for people getting into "fair fights" and easier for people who'r... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.26 13:46:00
47. Fleet hangars and changes to various settings - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Cain Leigh wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Salpun wrote: Looks better but some will complain. Any word on pos security improvements or will that have to wait till the new poses? Might want to clearify which corp hangers are effected. All sh... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.08 13:44:00
48. Fleet hangars and changes to various settings - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Hi everyone, Just FYI I've been out all evening and I'm not in the office tomorrow, so there may be a couple of days' delay before I get back to this thread. Panic ye not in the meantime, I'll get to it :) -Greyscale - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.01 23:25:00
49. Fleet hangars and changes to various settings - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Salpun wrote: Looks better but some will complain. Any word on pos security improvements or will that have to wait till the new poses? Might want to clearify which corp hangers are effected. All ship equiped corp hangers for example. No of... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.01 13:17:00
50. Fleet hangars and changes to various settings - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Ok, so here's our current complete plan: Corp hangars are now fleet hangars Volumes will all stay the same Divisions are gone, as is any other reliance on corp roles Ship fitting array is always available to everyone in your corp and/or ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.11.01 13:04:00
51. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Real life analogies have never convinced anyone of anything ever The reason that stealing flags you to everyone is pretty simple: there's not an obviously better solution that doesn't add a ton of complexity. We're kicking around the idea of re... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 22:45:00
52. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Vol Arm'OOO wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: None taken, don't worry. The primary goal of these changes was to simplify a horrifically complex system to the point where the average player could reasonably be expected to be able to understand ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 21:43:00
53. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sarah Schneider wrote: With no disrespect towards the huge amount of work you guys have done and still going to do (hopefully) and probably slightly unrelated to the crimewatch development. No matter how you spin in it, CCP are, moving towards ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 20:46:00
54. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Warde Guildencrantz wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: If we wanted to do that then we would've spent a month putting in code that stopped you from committing crimes in the first place, rather than a year overhauling the system that gives interes... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 14:59:00
55. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Myxx wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Ok, so explain to me under what conditions a starbase with just "attack if aggression" set would fire on a player under the current implementation of Crimewatch, and how you as a player would go about predict... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 14:27:00
56. Crimewatch pointless on arrival - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ok, so explain to me under what conditions a starbase with just "attack if aggression" set would fire on a player under the current implementation of Crimewatch, and how you as a player would go about predicting its likely behavior (before we remo... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.04 13:45:00
57. CCP needs a Grammarian - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] MailDeadDrop wrote: Oh really? Like Pax Amarria? Sounds like I should file a bug report to have it "corrected" to Pax Amarr (per CCP Affinity). MDD That book title is in Old Amarr, it's perfectly legit. (I may or may not have made that ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.10.02 23:45:00
58. CCP needs a Grammarian - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] We have several very skilled editors in-house, they just don't have time to look at every sentence in the game right now. If you do spot errors, please file a bug report and they will get fixed (I know this because I fix a lot of them myself). - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.09.30 15:54:00
59. [Winter] More Combat Frigates! - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] CCP Fozzie wrote: Belsina wrote: NO NO and again NO i will NOT support that dicision i am willing to support the idea where the --> Kestrel, Iquisitor, Breacher and my favorite hull-design the Tristan <-- are rocket-/light missile plat... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.09.17 14:26:00
60. The grammar and other low priority fixes thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] adopt wrote: How about CCP spells "Armour" and "Defence" correctly as well? We're standardized on US English spelling. As a Brit that makes me immensely sad, but that's our policy and it'll continue to be that way for the foreseeable future - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.09.15 14:04:00
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.