EVE Search - Posts by CCP Greyscale

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 141-160 of 1600 for by author CCP Greyscale (0,25 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
141. Sticky:Blueprint data adjustments thread - in Science and Industry [original thread] Orovana wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Basically modules get a lot slower, ships get way faster, and everything uses a unified time. It is a reduction in throughput to module manufacturing but we're reasonably comfortable with it given that ev... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 11:56:00
142. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote: 'Structure Cost Scaling' Otherwise known as onlining multiples of the same array to gain tax bonuses at POSes. CCP devs seem unwilling to discuss or answer questions on this issue at the comments section of th... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 11:55:00
143. Sticky:[Crius] Industry Landscape feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] RAMs are working internally at least, I haven't verified SiSi but they should (apparently) be divided up there too. - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 11:04:00
144. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Kusum Fawn wrote: Devblog Researching the future wrote: Unless this leads to a major expansion of invent-to-sell, the actual throughput of invention should not significantly change as a result of shorter copy times. CCP Grayscale wrote:... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 11:01:00
145. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Laendra wrote: Invention of T2 ships, specifically the Rapier, it says max runs per Blueprint Copy is 1??? I used the Optimized Cryptic Attainment, which should have given me 3 runs (+2) BPC are still in my hangar if you need to look. Also,... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 10:47:00
146. Sticky:[Crius] Industry Landscape feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Sigras wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Sigras wrote: Also I just invented a BPC with no decryptors and a 0/0 input BPC and it came out ME 2% PE 4% I thought everything was being rebalanced so that it was ME 0 PE 0 base with decryptors giving ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 10:41:00
147. Sticky:Blueprint data adjustments thread - in Science and Industry [original thread] Orovana wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: - We would like to make copy times consistently lower than build times, so building from copies is the optimal play (dovetails with our starbase changes, for example) First to state that manifacturing... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.18 10:37:00
148. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Lotus Ambrosia wrote: Bridgette d'Iberville wrote: Lotus Ambrosia wrote: Are you still intending to remove the option of POS Reserching BPO that are in station? That is correct. In order to do something with a BPO/BPC, it has to be wher... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 17:08:00
149. Sticky:Dev blog: The Price of Change - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Seith Kali wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Still trying to get hold of the the global usage numbers :) You can do it, I believe in you. 2536236015 total manufacturing job minutes over 28 days, assuming we've extracted the correct numbers... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 15:43:00
150. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Qmamoto Kansuke wrote: Scout Vyvorant wrote: I've tryed, again, to invent some T2 Bpc. On live, I consume a max run BPC to create, in the case of modules, a 10-12 run T2 BPC. On the test server I consume a single run of the BPC to create a... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 14:45:00
151. Sticky:Blueprint data adjustments thread - in Science and Industry [original thread] Generally trying to get rid of extreme bottlenecks is intentional, yes. If there's a strong reason for cloaks to have a higher overall end-to-end time we can potentially do that, but I'd rather not push them too much further than they already are ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 14:29:00
152. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Seith Kali wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: ...and the risk is compartmentalized separately to the risks involved in manufacturing changes. What on earth are you talking about? An increase in goo supply is going to add a hell of a lot to consi... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 11:58:00
153. Sticky:[Crius] Industry Landscape feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Sigras wrote: Also I just invented a BPC with no decryptors and a 0/0 input BPC and it came out ME 2% PE 4% I thought everything was being rebalanced so that it was ME 0 PE 0 base with decryptors giving you a bonus? Additionally I found that ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 11:00:00
154. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Aryth wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: MailDeadDrop wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Bridgette d'Iberville wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: 0.5 or higher as of Crius. We changed a >= to a > so the code does what the authoring was always a... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 10:58:00
155. Sticky:Blueprint data adjustments thread - in Science and Industry [original thread] Ravenclaw2kk wrote: What's happening with modules that are currently copy time limited? There seem to be some huge changes in niche markets like T2 cloaks where currently you can produce 3 max run copies in about 28 days yielding about 15 modul... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.16 10:49:00
156. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Sales Alt negrodamus wrote: Sales Alt negrodamus wrote: invention doesn't seem to be working at all. i'm trying to do some capital t2 trimarks as a test to see what decryptors do, however currently I am getting a 0% invention chance regardl... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.13 17:31:00
157. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] MailDeadDrop wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Bridgette d'Iberville wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: 0.5 or higher as of Crius. We changed a >= to a > so the code does what the authoring was always assuming it did. I just fixed the display... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.13 16:37:00
158. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Bridgette d'Iberville wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: 0.5 or higher as of Crius. We changed a >= to a > so the code does what the authoring was always assuming it did. I just fixed the display text for the attributes this afternoon to refl... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.13 16:15:00
159. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Bridgette d'Iberville wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: ...expressing your professional judgements as to the likely state of our codebase in five weeks' time. CCP Greyscale has a sneaky, yet powerful, pimp hand. OT: I'm just going to wait unti... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.13 16:12:00
160. Sticky:[Crius] Starbase feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Soldarius wrote: Blue Harrier wrote: Thanks for the earlier reply to my other post. Now a question; We now have the facility to anchor a POS in high sector space but do I take it we will not be able to harvest moons? I did try and set up a... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2014.06.13 16:09:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.