EVE Search - Posts by CCP Greyscale

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 141-160 of 1218 for by author CCP Greyscale (0,28 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60
141. Anaconda and Python mine BPO's missing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Types all exist on TQ again now The current plan is to do the item restoration tomorrow, pending final verification. To deal with situations where the items may have been in locations that have been destroyed, we're doing the following: -Any i... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.25 11:50:00
142. Sticky:EVE Online: Escalation to Inferno Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Cravenel wrote: Patch notes: All common Rogue Drones will no longer drop alloys and will instead have bounties in line with other NPCs. Above is false. Drones do not drop anything(Malpais). Bounties are not even 50% of regular rats. drones: B... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.25 10:30:00
143. Sticky:EVE Online: Escalation to Inferno Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] hakkiew365 wrote: Elite drone parasites drop no bounty. Not sure if this is an intended feature. Yup, they didn't drop alloys before and they don't have a bounty now. - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.25 10:17:00
144. Anyone else having problems accessing orca hanger from fleet? - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread] That's not something that we're planning on supporting - if they're going to be corp hangars, they really should be corp-restricted, and trying to maintain all the code special-cases the old implementation needed was causing problems. That said, w... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.24 16:28:00
145. Hay CCP, are you trying to make nullsec more homogeneous? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] MeBiatch wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Gogela wrote: from the escalation patchnotes ... Quote: Worldshaping The security status of systems in Etherium Reach, Malpais, Oasa, Outer Passage, Perrigen Falls, The Kalvela Expanse and the... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 18:03:00
146. Sticky:EVE Online: Escalation to Inferno Deployment Information - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Teibor wrote: still needs clarification on drone alloys that have already dropped and are in hangars etc. - after DT, will these still appear in hangars if there already before DT? - will these still repro into the relevent minerals? edit: ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 17:25:00
147. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] MisterAl tt1 wrote: Quote: Ships Titans can now lock a maximum of three targets. XL turrets have had their signature resolution set to 2000m. Capital Turrets that are fitted to titans now have a new damage-scaling attribute; targets with a ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 16:47:00
148. Sticky:EVE Online: Escalation to Inferno Deployment Information - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Warrior Xena wrote: This is unclear : GÇóXL turrets have had their signature resolution set to 2000m. GÇóCapital Turrets that are fitted to titans now have a new damage-scaling attribute; targets with a signature radius smaller than this size ... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 16:18:00
149. Hay CCP, are you trying to make nullsec more homogeneous? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I had a bit of spare time in between deployment-related activities, so I sorted out an extended version of the image in the blog to illustrate exactly why we decided to make this change: HERE IS A LINK - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 16:04:00
150. Hay CCP, are you trying to make nullsec more homogeneous? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gogela wrote: from the escalation patchnotes ... Quote: Worldshaping The security status of systems in Etherium Reach, Malpais, Oasa, Outer Passage, Perrigen Falls, The Kalvela Expanse and the Spire has been adjusted upwards to bring t... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 14:53:00
151. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Tehg Rhind wrote: Bouh Revetoile wrote: Thread is gingo round in circles though... Yes but the question is CAN WE TRACK IT. I have to admit, I laughed pretty hard at this. - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.23 10:19:00
152. "Ship rebalancing" in Escalation/Inferno- when will we get it on SISI? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Titan balance fixes are already on Singularity - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.20 13:09:00
153. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] I'm Down wrote: Greyscale states that double the sig has the exact same effect in the tracking formula. He's an idiot. Doubling the signature resolution is the same as halving the tracking. My math isn't brilliant but I asked one of our math... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.20 10:55:00
154. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] I'm honestly reluctant to push this change any further at this point, and we're reasonably hopeful that the combination of the locked-targets reduction, the damage reduction and the tracking nerf will give people enough wiggle room to fly a dictor... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.18 17:05:00
155. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Cid Tazer wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: Hi Greyscale! After some testing we've found that dictors are still hilariously vulnerable to being picked off, especially since the tracking and target painter situations are unch... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.18 14:31:00
156. Turret Damage linked to sig radius!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Xeyena wrote: Why should dreads be able to blap subcaps either? All XL guns should have the same penalty, or we're just going to get "tracking dreads"... If we apply it to dreads as well, it becomes very hard to deal with low-sig-radius (x-i... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.18 14:29:00
157. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] CynoNet Two wrote: Hi Greyscale! After some testing we've found that dictors are still hilariously vulnerable to being picked off, especially since the tracking and target painter situations are unchanged. Current supercap fleet setups can sti... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.18 14:06:00
158. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Kralin Ignatov wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Raivi wrote: Greyscale, any chance you can let us know what formula the current iteration uses for the damage reduction? Saves us the effort of reverse engineering it on sisi. :) Simple area c... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.17 17:31:00
159. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Raivi wrote: Greyscale, any chance you can let us know what formula the current iteration uses for the damage reduction? Saves us the effort of reverse engineering it on sisi. :) Simple area comparison: damage is multiplied by sig_radius^2/n... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.17 16:59:00
160. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread] CCP Greyscale wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Example: the "one tower per corp per day per system" rule is in principle hugely exploitable by having lots of corps anchor towers and then join the alliance. In practice and AF... - by CCP Greyscale - at 2012.04.17 15:36:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.