Pages: [1] |
1. WTS - 3x 60day GTC @ 1.24bil [Secure Only] **ONLINE** - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
1. 2. 3.
- by Curver - at 2014.02.11 22:00:00
|
2. Class 3 WH - PVP and PVE: Amarr Ship of Choice - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
So i'm stuck deciding which ship will be best for me to fly in a wormhole (only a C3) and will be able to hold it's own if a PVP fight arises. I can't really use missiles so lazers are the way forwards. The Legion - Is it me or no-matter how y...
- by Curver - at 2011.06.28 13:34:00
|
3. New Dev Blog: Dev Track Feedback: Monetizing Your Apps and Services - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I personally feel that this change is wrong. Developers put in a large amount of time developing applications to help support EVE Online which ultimately makes things better for the playerbase and helps keep subscriptions alive. At the end of the ...
- by Curver - at 2011.06.21 17:02:00
|
4. LulzSec DDOS Discussion Thread (Following Eve Downtime) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Curver on 14/06/2011 23:24:04 Originally by: Izziee No, not the first, mentioned in 3 of the few before this one. Sorry for the claim, the website was running incredibly slow when I posted. Nonetheless, worth a discussio...
- by Curver - at 2011.06.14 23:22:00
|
5. LulzSec DDOS Discussion Thread (Following Eve Downtime) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The thread to discuss the DDOS (think its the first). Links: http://twitter.com/#!/lulzsec http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/06/titanic-takeover-tuesday-lulzsecs-busy-day-of-hacking-escapades.ars "Next in line were the login servers ...
- by Curver - at 2011.06.14 23:13:00
|
6. Reducing Blob Focus Fire (a more realistic way) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some interesting ideas in this thread. Two things i was thinking about just off the top of my head now: 1) The larger your fleet, the larger your sig radius as a result as you are detected as a Blob. This may discourage oversized blobs and may en...
- by Curver - at 2010.04.17 14:05:00
|
7. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Curver on 31/01/2007 14:58:12 Originally by: maarud Heh, I was smart, I chose the $ option when choosing to pay for my sub, so I pay less than the euro option. They should just remove the euro option and keep it all $ reall...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 15:01:00
|
8. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
But how to know when you have to pay vat, quoting from direct.gov.uk: "Businesses with annual sales below ú61,000 don't have to register for (and therefore charge) VAT. If they don't, the price you pay for their goods or services may be cheaper t...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 15:00:00
|
9. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
isnt it the responcibility of the retailer to pay VAT? For example, i walk into my local store, buy a mouse at ú3.00 i dont get to the till and they go you need to pay vat on that. Why because its included in the price, why is it included in the ...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 14:38:00
|
10. Alt Discouraging Feature - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
step 4: use a friends computer with a stable internet connection to create alt. step 5: enjoy yoru new alt
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 14:12:00
|
11. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
no i dont expect brittain to expect us to pay in dollers. I expect them to raise the cost of GTC's or lower the cost of the euro subscription. I am looking out for CCP's best interest. It is much better for business is people subscribe via dir...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 14:10:00
|
12. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well ccp have direct conrol of their subscriptions. Its not like they are powerless. They must sell GTC's to companies to sell on to us, they should make these companies sell the gtc's at the same cost to subscription or MORE. Prefrably more to d...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 13:59:00
|
13. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
all calculations were done using www.xe.com which in my experence is one of the most relyable upto date curreny converters. The gtc's were inclusive of VAT, if there is vat added to the credit card cost also it makes the different even more steep!
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 13:02:00
|
14. What is wrong with the current Subscription Process when using C/C - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hello everyone. I have recently had to re-sub my game since my game expired when i noticed somthing rather strange. I personally pay via credit card, directly to ccp. i thougth this was the chespest most effective way but it seems i am mistaken...
- by Curver - at 2007.01.31 12:36:00
|
15. The New Vengeance - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
dont u htink assult frings are designed not to be hit with the low armor? i think its better to orbit and take less shots and less damage then to try and tank. but stilll have the tank in lows so the shots you do take you dont have to use your re...
- by Curver - at 2006.06.21 23:36:00
|
16. The New Vengeance - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
3x dual light tech 2 - tech 2 crystals 1x malkuth standard launcher (so its only 20cpu because using the best named leaves u .25 unsder?!!!) 1x named AB 1x named 20k scram 1x named web 1x tech 2 small rep 1x Adaptive nano membrane 2 1x thermalic...
- by Curver - at 2006.06.21 23:33:00
|
17. The New Vengeance - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
20k scram is a must since you loose most of your targets otherwise.. but having the 20k scram the highslot is either the named nos or a rocket launcher...
- by Curver - at 2006.06.21 23:06:00
|
18. The New Vengeance - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
ive been thinking 3x dual light tech 2 - tech 2 crystals 1x small e50 nos 1x named AB 1x named 20k scram 1x named web 1x tech 2 small rep 1x ANM 2 1x thermalic membrane 2 1x named damage control i did want to drop the damage control for a hs b...
- by Curver - at 2006.06.21 13:15:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |