Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Devi Loches wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Mostlyharmlesss wrote: What are you talking about? If we reinforce the entire region we just move 7 jumps to another constallation and voil+í and bunch of new timers. By the time the 5...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:25:27
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jessica Serrato wrote: Sov is hard, its suppose to be. I don't agree with the current system, but making it into a laughing stock of "okay during this 4 hours we need 100 Frigates to remove Sov" isn't going to make it fun, its going to make it...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:22:07
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Mostlyharmlesss wrote: What are you talking about? If we reinforce the entire region we just move 7 jumps to another constallation and voil+í and bunch of new timers. By the time the 5 minute Entosis cycle is done the hostile...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:15:56
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I've been thinking about these blitzing inty fleets. My first though was about all the tools at our disposal to counter such lol-fit ships, for which there are plenty. However, further pondering has brought to mine the...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:13:07
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
FlameOfSurvival wrote: SilentAsTheGrave wrote: FlameOfSurvival wrote: Sure we need Sov changes but where is the risk for the attacker? this is just an annyoing system that force sov holder to constantly show up to timers just because a...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:08:54
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Accki wrote: People that are worried about the T2 Entosis link range of 250km been op. it sounds like its a targeted module, so whatever ship fits it can only burn around in a bubble of its own target range, not the full 250k bubble The prime...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:07:53
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Mostlyharmlesss wrote: No, that's the point. We're not going to provide any content to whatever alliance holds the space. We're going to take their sov with an interceptor fleet because we dictate the battles and they will be...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 01:03:11
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Mostlyharmlesss wrote: If the changes goes through like they are now, I'm unironically going to take a 200 man interceptor fleet to Provi and reinforce the entire region in 4 hours. Sounds like good content creation - then...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 00:37:11
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Devi Loches wrote: I have no connection to Goons whatsoever. I live in a single constellation that my alliance owns. I'm worried about these interceptors trolling and keeping me from being able to go have real fights by eithe...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 00:08:04
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Devi Loches wrote: Eli Apol wrote: afkalt wrote: These phantom interceptors threats are nothing short of a nonsense if you live in your space. Precisely, it's no surprise that they're being hyped up as gamebreaking by...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.05 00:03:09
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: afkalt wrote: These phantom interceptors threats are nothing short of a nonsense if you live in your space. Precisely, it's no surprise that they're being hyped up as gamebreaking by TMC and on this thread - it's because ...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:56:06
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Galphii wrote: An interesting system with a few flaws which, if addressed, would make it worth trying on TQ. * Reduce the range on the T2 entosis link to 50km. You want to bring ships in at a reasonable range for a fight to happen, and not jus...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:49:39
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Devi Loches wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Violent Morgana wrote: So I have gang of 20 ceptors, fit for extreme speed (20km/s for example and 150km locking range) and t2 Entosis Link. Who/What can stop my gang from reinforcing th...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:44:22
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Devi Loches wrote: So far this seems like the only reasonable counter to the trollceptors I've seen. It keeps the risks of defense roughly equal to that of the attackers. (Not the insanely expensive interceptors mentioned abo...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:42:40
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Violent Morgana wrote: So I have gang of 20 ceptors, fit for extreme speed (20km/s for example and 150km locking range) and t2 Entosis Link. Who/What can stop my gang from reinforcing the whole region? The module needs to eit...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:36:01
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Devi Loches wrote: Axloth Okiah wrote: It is incredible how many posts are devoted to interceptors while we have no idea about the fitting... imho one of the more elegant solutions (assuming its even an issue) would be makin...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:25:18
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: Devi Loches wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Vincent Athena wrote: On the entire interceptor thing: If it really does become a big issue, a simple change would be: "Activating an Entosis Link also causes ships to become ex...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:22:26
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Axloth Okiah wrote: It is incredible how many posts are devoted to interceptors while we have no idea about the fitting... imho one of the more elegant solutions (assuming its even an issue) would be making the entosis module thingy relatively ...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:18:32
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Vincent Athena wrote: On the entire interceptor thing: If it really does become a big issue, a simple change would be: "Activating an Entosis Link also causes ships to become extremely vulnerable for the duration of the modu...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:09:03
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: On the entire interceptor thing: If it really does become a big issue, a simple change would be: "Activating an Entosis Link also causes ships to become extremely vulnerable for the duration of the moduleGÇÖs cycle: the e...
- by Devi Loches - at 2015.03.04 23:04:17
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |