Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
581. My beef with ship modifications - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hi there. I'm going to talk about rigs. I don't think its a widespread sentiment, but I feel that rigs should be completely redone. And before you whack off some reply, read a bit more and see if you actually disagree or you just feel argumentat...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 02:30:00
|
582. My beef with ship modifications - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Reserved.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 02:30:00
|
583. The Teaspoon Effect - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Iamien Do you guys not realize that without our pod technology, we are mortal. If there is combat in stations and we die, we are dead forever. Once we leave our pods we are no longer demi-gods. Playing the realism card ...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 01:28:00
|
584. More New Ships (Not T3) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They could do a lot of stupid things. Doesn't mean they should.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 00:59:00
|
585. Scan Probes - A little hard to make out! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP should move forwards, not backwards. Rightwards, not leftwards. Upwards, not downwards.. and always twirling! Twirling towards hilarity!
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 00:03:00
|
586. Cruise Missiles - Torpedos - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Despite knowing that would never happen, you decided to make a thread anyway.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.17 00:00:00
|
587. More New Ships (Not T3) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would rather have three classes that meant something than 50 that don't. These ******ed requests for more ships are coming from the same clowns whose game revolves around acquiring the next biggest toy. Ships are NOT content, they are TOOLS. T...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:58:00
|
588. The Teaspoon Effect - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really don't care if they keep stations a combat free zone, as long as I can blow up the stations. Why Outposts continue to remain indestructible is beyond me.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:53:00
|
589. The Proteus: Manta Ray version - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I saw one person in this thread praising the Proteus for its looks. Better leave before I have an aneurysm.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:45:00
|
590. I just saved a whole lot of isk by switching to preview. Thanks CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
/scans through thread Really? Not one? Sigh.. I JUST SAVED A BUNCH OF ISK BY SWITCHING TO GEICO
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:44:00
|
591. EVE Online: Apocrypha 1.1 Feedback Thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Oh yeah, the whole mess of ECM changes is horrible. You could've just dropped Falcon strength by 5% to where it was before it became FOTM and on par with Rook. EW in EVE is probably the most unrefined, stupid and boring part of combat.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:38:00
|
592. EVE Online: Apocrypha 1.1 Feedback Thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
1. Bombers are now FOTM, covops cloak makes them overpowered. 2. Address book is bugged and bordering worthlessness. If you have any mercy, you'll fix it. 3. Had solarsystem view bug up on me and fail to render icons after a probing session, fix...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:35:00
|
593. Destroyers - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
While the pictures are gone, this old thread might explain the woe and despair in your life.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:25:00
|
594. Destroyers - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Destroyers have a focused role, and its a good one. It makes sense, and the stats back it up. Problem is that role is killing Frigates . Well, roofle**** on that. No one cared about Stealth Bombers for the same reason nobody gives a crap about...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:23:00
|
595. Apoc 1.1: Addressbook bug fixed, maybe? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Maybe not, but I am ready to row row and fight the power. Or at least whine a lot. FIX THE ADDRESSBOOK GOGOGOGOG
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 23:16:00
|
596. Apoc 1.1: Addressbook bug fixed, maybe? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
LIES AND SLANDER I used alts >_> Are you saying I should write a huge epitaph on the fall of CCP complete with flow charts and industry experts to win back their love?
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 16:06:00
|
597. Status of the "Arena" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I find it frightening and shameful that you spent any development resources on arenas.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 16:03:00
|
598. Apoc 1.1: Addressbook bug fixed, maybe? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't see this in the patch notes, but the address book bug has been brought up and reported numerous times. It has existed for at least a year now, and makes empire war a huge pile of grief. This is my third thread on the issue, and its getting...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 07:41:00
|
599. Old warp effect back, with pixelation... why? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Both of the new effects are pretty lame. Actually, the whole effects overhaul in Apocrypha has been a huge disappointment.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.16 07:39:00
|
600. WTS 4x 60day TC 640 mill (secure) Ingame now, fast accept - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
1 for Hunyoo Gurglebush
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.04.14 20:56:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |