| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. List of decent FW corps? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: BattleStar Crusader Im happy that my corp got put up there with the decnt fw pvp corps :) and that i was directly mentioned. Thank you, absinthe extends and invite to all amarr milita members who wish to join it ranks. A few...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.11.25 06:05:00
|
2. List of decent FW corps? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Cushan I'm curious why the militias can't seem to retain good corps. Any ideas? Failure at rebalancing/introducing new content on CCP's side mayhap? It's not like people did NOT repeatedly complain about the rather meag...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.11.24 12:32:00
|
3. [Issue] FW :: Allied faction does can not be filtered off overview - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Supported, overview needs a functionality buff for FW. Perhaps as much as an extra tutorial on how to set up a seperate overview for FW?
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.19 12:12:00
|
4. [Issue] Separate Faction Warfare forum - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Fairly easy point IMHO. Please urge CCP to implement a particular subforum (or even two, one RP, one non-RP) for FW issues. At the moment FW topics are scattered between different other forums and unnecessarily complicated to keep an eye on. Plu...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.18 11:51:00
|
5. [Issue] Separate Faction Warfare forum - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Fairly easy point IMHO. Please urge CCP to implement a particular subforum (or even two, one RP, one non-RP) for FW issues. At the moment FW topics are scattered between different other forums and unnecessarily complicated to keep an eye on. Plu...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.18 11:51:00
|
6. [IDEA] AF simple boost - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Let me first state again that I fully support a reworking of AFs in general. No need for second thoughts there. Just this suggested solution... Originally by: Arkios Odymei [...]Their overall achievable speeds would be much less than I...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.17 21:00:00
|
7. [IDEA] AF simple boost - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
If you reduce mass on all AFs measurably, you'd just breed another variety of nano-ships. As much as AFs can use some "extra", I'd hate to see that happen. Sorry, no support for this tweak.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.17 10:52:00
|
8. [ISSUE] Speed Setups aka Nanos - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
You may have a point there, Jade, agreed. But what about the part of EVE-O that is not 0.0? I know it is often conveniently forgotten that some people live there, too... Moreover, if you argue that the "nano-phenomenon" is absolutely necessary d...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 16:13:00
|
9. [Issue] The Nighthawk needs a powergrid increase - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Kailani, you'll also notice that a lot of the rejections were based on the principle that they didn't want the CSM to get into the minutia of ship-balancing. That's an entirely reasonable viewpoint, and it'...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 15:49:00
|
10. LAG: ôWithout solid verification in each individual case" - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Wrathamon Starfury [...] I agree that they should stop with the new stuff for a while and finish the "Need for Speed" changes. This!
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 07:47:00
|
11. [Proposal] Skill: Advanced Infomorph Psychology - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Fully supported. About the complexity level of the skill... IMHO it should be about as hard to train up as Thermodynamics to give an orientation point.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 07:27:00
|
12. [Issue] The Pilgrim aka. Amarr's Broken Force Recon - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I would support a closer look by the devs at the Pilgrim, but I cannot say I really like either of your suggestions that well. Still, supporting it FWIW.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 07:09:00
|
13. [ISSUE] Speed Setups aka Nanos - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Not in favour of a plain nerf, but some rebalancing might be in order, I think.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.16 07:02:00
|
14. [Issue] 0.5 standings need for Faction Warfare - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Why not alter the required standing for signing up for a FW militia by the number of participants then? Considering vast numerical disparities ATM... And of course you can get the 0.5+ faction standing during a trial. Of course you have to know h...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.15 10:28:00
|
15. [Issue] Fix the forums - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yeah, and better start with this subforum which becomes more of a mess by the day...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.06 04:54:00
|
16. [Issue] Proposals for UI improvements - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Racial fonts to choose from? It's not like the standard font of the UI is really awesome... But totally supported.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.05 12:14:00
|
17. [module/feature] Capital Mining Needs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.05 12:10:00
|
18. No Topic - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Would be especially interesting to see from my POV if the actual cost of the individual capitals ship types (in terms of training and actual ISK) still reflects their usefulness/versatility or has run askew...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.02 18:07:00
|
19. [Issue] Amarr Recons - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Review cannot hurt... unless it ends up as another "NOS-nerf"...
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.02 18:03:00
|
20. any new fanfest info? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, it's not like it's pushing hard on Xmas already, so those of us who have to plan ahead for vacations could still hope details will be realeased in time / "soon"(TM). And foster hopes of making it to the fanfest... 2009.
- by Dlardrageth - at 2008.06.02 17:37:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |