Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:Dev Blog: A New Deployable From The Upwell Consortium - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Worth a chuckle. Here's a thought though: Actually make this a real deployable. The deployable could allow us a chance to recover the victim(s)'s implants.... along with other.... byproducts....
- by Elzon1 - at 2017.04.04 08:25:08
|
2. Chance based cyno jamming module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
HiddenPorpoise wrote: If you thought sitting still for a cyno was unpleasant before, just wait until NOTHING HAPPENS. Hrm... I think an edit is in order...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.10.17 08:07:00
|
3. Chance based cyno jamming module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not a fan of arbitrarily limiting the players of EVE with silly new rules. Instead I prefer it when we are given a new capability that allows for accomplishing of the desired effect. In this case we are talking about the "hot drop". This is ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.10.17 07:53:00
|
4. [Proposal] 0.0 sov mechanics/ ratting (anomaly) participant expansio... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Many, if not most null sec residents make their persoanl isk from ratting. Who is going to want to give up ratting in the good systems and go to a system several jumps away, where they will make significantly less isk fo...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.09.17 09:06:00
|
5. [Proposal] 0.0 sov mechanics/ ratting (anomaly) participant expansio... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Well I'm not going to be running quote out, but I think you underestimate how much activity a null coalition busts out. At the moment we stick to handfuls of systems, but only because we don't need to spread out. Should we nee...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.08.20 09:59:00
|
6. [Proposal] 0.0 sov mechanics/ ratting (anomaly) participant expansio... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
"This is definitely the first time this has been suggested. Honest." Yes, I know this isn't the first time this has come up. "And the issue is still the same. Group A blobs and camps group B out of their system." Blobing is always an effective ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.08.19 07:00:00
|
7. [Proposal] 0.0 sov mechanics/ ratting (anomaly) participant expansio... - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
This proposal will cover two interconnected subjects: 1. Sov mechanics 2. Ratting participant expansion Before I go on about sov mechanics the topic of individual system player capacity needs to be addressed. One of the main reasons sov holders ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.08.18 08:12:00
|
8. "Minmatar Advanced Outpost Refinery Platform Blueprint" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Derrick Miles wrote: I don't see the harm in seeding the blueprint, assuming the material cost is similar to the current npc cost. However, I don't see the blueprint's existence as related to Crius. 1. Previously CCP has stated they want to ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.07.28 08:57:00
|
9. "Minmatar Advanced Outpost Refinery Platform Blueprint" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So, CCP made some changes to the industrial processes in EVE. Among them is the change to reprocessing modules, ships, ammo, deployables, etc.. Player owned Minmatar outposts with "Minmatar Advanced Outpost Refinery Platform" were given an adva...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.07.28 08:00:00
|
10. Jita prices crashing? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Pheusia wrote: Elzon1 wrote: The market will shift from a massive mineral storage device into a just-in-time production cycle. It's surprising how few people have noticed this. Strange, I usually feel as if I'm pointing out the obvi...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.07.22 05:12:00
|
11. Jita prices crashing? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
People are just reacting to the changes coming in Cruis. All people will really have to due is take their industrial operations a bit further out from Jita than they currently are. The more interesting aspect to Cruis is what is going to happen...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.07.21 08:35:00
|
12. Sticky:[Summer 2014] Jump Drive Isotope Consumption - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cardano Firesnake wrote: And to come back? There will be a time where your freighters will have to warp to the Titan in his POS in Null Sec. If Hostile know you use this system for Logi an AFK cloaky will be there 24/24 until the day he will op...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.05.09 08:21:00
|
13. Sticky:[Summer 2014] Jump Drive Isotope Consumption - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cardano Firesnake wrote: I love the idea of a fleet of freighters warping to a pos where a Titan is waiting and get bubbled @ 350km of the pos by a sabre who uncloaked. Or perharps a Titan who is lighting a bridge near a station surronded by...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.05.06 17:58:00
|
14. Sticky:[Summer 2014] Jump Drive Isotope Consumption - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Funny, I was expecting this to be a general rebalance of Titan jump portals. I'm a bit confused by this. If you want to limit power projection you should probably bring the Titan's jump portal in line with other capital ship jump drives. First t...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.05.05 09:37:00
|
15. Big Surprise In Jita - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seraph Essael wrote: Waffle is a leavened batter or dough cooked between two plates, patterned to give a characteristic size, shape and surface impression. There are many variations based on the type of iron and recipe used, with over a dozen r...
- by Elzon1 - at 2014.04.23 04:50:00
|
16. Sticky:Feedback Request - Margin trading and accurate market UI - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The simplest solution to this might be to just "grey-out" any buy order that cannot be completed due to being a margin trade where the buyer doesn't have enough isk to cover the deal at the moment. If the seller attempts to sell to said buy orde...
- by Elzon1 - at 2013.11.29 08:09:00
|
17. What extra features should still be added to Rubicon? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KuroVolt wrote: Elzon1 wrote: 1. Sov system based on player activity in a system over a week's time span while contested. This negates annoying timers and boring structure grinding aside from stations (separate from sov system). Also, inact...
- by Elzon1 - at 2013.09.28 18:06:00
|
18. What extra features should still be added to Rubicon? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well CCP did get to one of my pet peeve's with the warp acceleration/deceleration change. There are only two major items in my personal list that CCP still haven't added to the game, but eventually (inevitably) will. 1. Sov system based on play...
- by Elzon1 - at 2013.09.28 08:44:00
|
19. Winter Expansion Speculation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Uppsy Daisy wrote: Here we go again. Let's start with what we know. Marauder Rebalancing - source Marauders get a new stationary mini-siege mode enabled via the new Bastion Module. Bastion Mode: - Increases shield and armor repair am...
- by Elzon1 - at 2013.09.25 18:21:00
|
20. Sticky:[Winter] Marauder rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well, I liked the first iteration better than the second. I would say keep some of the t2 resists, but include some of the omni resists from the bastion module. The web bonus seems counter-intuitive considering the MJD bonus. The marauders must ...
- by Elzon1 - at 2013.09.06 08:22:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |