Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CCPls Conversation Invitation Shouldn't Give Away Online Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: So watchlist changes hurt many niche ways of playing Eve, such as solo wh hunting. But CCP heard supercapital pilots' voice over the niche minority. The argument was that the watchlist was "'free in...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.12 20:43:38
|
2. CCPls Conversation Invitation Shouldn't Give Away Online Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Un**** locator agents and this goes away. We need reasonable tools for tracking players and we dont currently have them, thats why this mechanic is being relied upon. Also , this is intell, not free intell. Free inte...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.12 20:42:22
|
3. CCPls Conversation Invitation Shouldn't Give Away Online Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Daemun Khanid wrote: Oh no's too much free intel. Ccplease make it so my ships dont show up on the bad mans overview, take away the look at feature and make targeting require manual visual aquisition. I need my safe space in space. You r...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.12 20:39:40
|
4. CCPls Conversation Invitation Shouldn't Give Away Online Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Somal Thunder wrote: If you auto-reject conversations, you get the same message as if you were offline. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks for that little nudge I did not check that. Another way is to send a mail and ...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.12 20:36:40
|
5. CCPls Conversation Invitation Shouldn't Give Away Online Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So watchlist changes hurt many niche ways of playing Eve, such as solo wh hunting. But CCP heard supercapital pilots' voice over the niche minority. The argument was that the watchlist was "'free intel". Now when I am hunting around people invite...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.12 15:30:43
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: You are meant to jam the fighters **** nugget The carrier isnt the one you should be jamming but sure cry more, my salt po...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 13:09:14
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: You are meant to jam the fighters **** nugget The carrier isnt the one you should be jamming but sure cry more, my salt powered carrier is loving the fuel So when you dr...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 13:01:39
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Because you never drop on solo carriers with a small fleet and I drop on them everyday.
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 13:00:30
|
9. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: You are meant to jam the fighters **** nugget The carrier isnt the one you should be jamming but sure cry more, my salt powered carrier is loving the fuel So when you drop on a carrier, if the carrier attacks someone wit...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:55:00
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Considering the hull and armour jump its a viable comparison, also the role is different for each one, a BLOPS is not mean...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:46:23
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Considering the hull and armour jump its a viable comparison, also the role is different for each one, a BLOPS is not meant to be a forward ship of the line, a HAC is Your ...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:39:37
|
12. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Considering the hull and armour jump its a viable comparison, also the role is different for each one, a BLOPS is not meant to be a forward ship of the line, a HAC is Your problem for using the ship for a purpose beyond its...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:29:14
|
13. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: CyberRaver wrote: Agrakari Saraki wrote: The original 900% NSA scanres boost made it a nightmare to keep carriers tackled with dictors, as they just instalock you and alpha the dictor off th...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:15:52
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: Looks like nullbears get what they want. Prior to capital patch it was possible to take down a carrier with 3 blopses. Now they alpha the blops battleships with abilities. The only way to survive...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:14:31
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CyberRaver wrote: Agrakari Saraki wrote: The original 900% NSA scanres boost made it a nightmare to keep carriers tackled with dictors, as they just instalock you and alpha the dictor off the field. If the intention was to prevent this, I do...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:09:08
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Looks like nullbears get what they want. Prior to capital patch it was possible to take down a carrier with 3 blopses. Now they alpha the blops battleships with abilities. The only way to survive was to jam the figthers. Now CCP takes away this c...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2016.06.10 12:02:38
|
17. D-Scan Scrolling - .001 Intervals - Problematic for Nullsec Hunting - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I missed a carrier yesterday because I had to manually write the 0.1 values and it costed me time. Please fix. Moreover when you switch the entry value to kilometers the scroll changes in 1 kilometer intervals. That is completely nonsensical lo...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2015.12.12 18:02:55
|
18. D-Scan Scrolling - .001 Intervals - Problematic for Nullsec Hunting - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hey CCP. So new changes to the scanners are overall really good. However this silent change where you no longer change the dscan value in 0.1 intervals but 0.001 has mixed but important implications. FW people and people who mainly deal with pl...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2015.12.11 16:15:13
|
19. Eve-Account Based Polling - Why Polling is not a Thing on Eve Forums... - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
So we have a little competition where the prize winner will be determined through public vote. The existing methods are susceptible to multiple voting frauds through ip change or creation of multiple accounts (if its a facebook poll or something)...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2015.12.11 02:44:01
|
20. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
erg cz wrote: Empress Honeybadger wrote: All those people should be forced to move to null or wh I prefer to play when I want to play and not when some fleet is scheduled. I would also appreciate possiblity to minimize risk of unwonated P...
- by Empress Honeybadger - at 2015.12.04 18:11:19
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |