Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
141. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kengutsi Akira Edited by: Kengutsi Akira on 02/03/2011 03:17:33 Edited by: Kengutsi Akira on 02/03/2011 03:16:39 Edited by: Kengutsi Akira on 02/03/2011 03:15:42 Quote: Originally by: EphemeronWithin 1 week...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.02 06:11:00
|
142. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
what gun type, what ammo type, how many damage mods? My "practical" tank+gank Tempest setups deal about 700-800 dps
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.02 01:47:00
|
143. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Ephemeron on 02/03/2011 00:53:34 Originally by: Mimiru Minahiro I thought about laughing at your avoidance, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and reframe the question: If CCP offered a ship to the playing public,...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.02 00:49:00
|
144. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Kepakh Originally by: Mimiru Minahiro As an aside- your diatribe sounds really really familiar. It is called 'WoW mentality'... You can't destroy other people's assets in WoW, so it has no bearing on this disc...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.02 00:16:00
|
145. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: however it is quite good at 25-15km ranges And how much DPS do you get at that range? For some reason I could never get my Tempest beyond 1000 dps, and that's at point blank, sitting still.
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.02 00:12:00
|
146. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Mimiru Minahiro Originally by: Ephemeron Isk plays integral part in game balance of EVE. So if CCP introduced a ship that was totally invulnerable, but made the cost of that ship sufficiently high enough, it wou...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 23:51:00
|
147. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Within 1 week of intensive analysis CCP could identify near 100% of all the bot farmers. Start with the assumption that someone who bots professionally will have multiple accounts. Check for multiple accounts connected thru 1 IP. That filters out...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 23:40:00
|
148. The CSM wants to get rid of Jump Bridges. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Make each jump thru the JB cost 10 million isk from user's wallet. That can bring some balance to the current situation. It's like a toll gate for a super highway. Most unbalanced things in EVE can be brought in order by economic adjustments.
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 23:22:00
|
149. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Ephemeron on 01/03/2011 23:08:09 Originally by: Mimiru Minahiro As HY says ISK has never been a balancing factor. Think of all the people who used to dump a bil into thier vagas. Most were not crazy good pilots, many lost mu...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 23:06:00
|
150. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ephemeron on 01/03/2011 21:54:17 Originally by: baltec1 Originally by: The Djego I doubt this. But yeah, feel free post your fit and explain your solo BS wisdom to me. 2x nano and MWD. Everything else is up to...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 21:51:00
|
151. [Proposal] Change the way sec status is gained. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
It is a reasonable request, considering that those who PvP in 0.0 get no sec penalties. So for pure 0.0 alliance people, it doesn't matter at all. Those that choose to kill in empire should deal with the consequences in empire.
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 21:46:00
|
152. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I don't like the proliferation of supercaps. But I really like that many people use T3 for PvP. People invest 500+ mil and a few days training into PvP ships - that's a very good thing. Use of expensive stuff in PvP makes it more exciting for eve...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 21:39:00
|
153. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Isus Jarode Originally by: hired goon Before we continue can someone please explain to me why you would subscribe to a 'Massively Multiplayer' game, then complain on said game's forums there is a lack of solo-play? ...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 19:51:00
|
154. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I rarely see battleships in roaming gangs of 0.0, tho battleship is still often used in low sec and empire wars. Anyone care to speculate why there's such a difference between empire and 0.0?
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 19:38:00
|
155. Bring back balance to frigate class - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I still believe that balance to the frigate scene can be returned by significantly restricting supply of Dramiels, resulting in significant cost increase for the superior ship. That way when people lose Dramiels, they lose a lot of money, making ...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 19:09:00
|
156. [Proposal] Faction/Pirate battlecruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Shobon Welp which part of 'market price is determined by supply vs demand' do you not comprehend? The profit margin is determined by free market. But the base cost is set by CCP in form of loyalty point + isk requirement f...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 18:59:00
|
157. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Verlaine Glariant Originally by: Ephemeron Who do you think will be tackled and held first of all? some HAC or a battleship? That depends on the ISK value of the target ship. But yes I'd go for the HAC because it's...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 05:29:00
|
158. The Second Nano Age - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: VannyDaCruz Edited by: VannyDaCruz on 01/03/2011 03:30:03 Have you EVEN been to null-sec around Geminate recently? 95% of the gangs are nano. Its not like nanos are dead. It's not that they are true "nano", it's just t...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 05:11:00
|
159. curious on the bots situation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Mara Rinn Edited by: Mara Rinn on 01/03/2011 01:05:29 Originally by: Ephemeron Nerfing local would be the single best thing CCP can do to hurt the bots in 0.0 Help players solve the problem Players already ha...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 01:38:00
|
160. The Second Nano Age - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Terianna Eri For someone with a reputation as an elite PVPer, you sure do whine for your instant win buttons awfully hard. Nano age was terrible and everybody knows it but you. Cry more. Anyone who throws the term "win...
- by Ephemeron - at 2011.03.01 01:28:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |