Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 |
1581. [proposal] WH space shows no local is win, now lets bring it to 0.0! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Quote: Nice, now you want people to move always in group and always have a guy playing picket ship with a cov ops to scan for possible hostiles. I want WOW stile raiding too? Mandatory mass operations? This game is meant to be playable ev...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 22:24:00
|
1582. [proposal] WH space shows no local is win, now lets bring it to 0.0! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul Originally by: Ephemeron How about this: the people who want to keep local will have an option to always appear in local. But those of us who don't want to show up in local, we won't show up unless we spe...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 22:04:00
|
1583. The new bomber should be introduced as a new ship not replace the old - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Zantaz We don't need a new ship. The fix is dead simple. Just bonus SB's to reverse the cruise missile nerf, let them warp cloaked, without a ******ed 30 second recloak delay, and a little boost to cloaked speed would be s...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 22:00:00
|
1584. The new bomber should be introduced as a new ship not replace the old - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
It makes perfect sense since the new stealth bomber represents significant departure from current one.
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:56:00
|
1585. [Proposal] Fire out CCP game designers "rebalancing" Stealth Bombers. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
let CCP make their new stealth bomber idea into a new ship. So we'd have 2 stealth bomber classes - one with cruise, one with torps
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:55:00
|
1586. [Proposal] Covert Cyno's in High-sec - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I would be okay with this if it couldn't be used to jump freighters and haulers as someone already pointed out, transporting logistics is ridiculously safe in EVE already. We don't want to make this game too carebear
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:53:00
|
1587. The Great Speed Nerf (An Idea) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Sidus Isaacs Nanoes are gone, and for good reason. Webs got hit a tad bit hard, but meh. If you were capable of objective reasoning and actually followed the 40 page threads discussion all possible aspects of the speed is...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:36:00
|
1588. stealth bomber - a solution that doesn't involve upsetting people - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why would you risk losing the ship you like now, just to make sure no new ships are created? I don't see any down side to adding of a new ship. If it turns out to be useless - who cares? it won't effect you in any way And the argument of "lets s...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:29:00
|
1589. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rajere Originally by: RedSplat BO DPS and tank is already severly compromised, a t2 fit tier 1 BS will roll a BO at close range with ease, while snipefit BO are out performed by T1 BS. Redeemer + Arazu vs Typhoon...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 21:18:00
|
1590. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: RedSplat Until Pilots with Covops cloaks active dont appear in local, or local is universally delayed, your much vaunted 'stealth tactics' are all so much hot air. Eventually the local nerf will happen. And when it finally...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 20:04:00
|
1591. stealth bomber - a solution that doesn't involve upsetting people - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Solid Prefekt I don't like it, they should not spend time on a whole new ship no one will fly. Just keep the SB the way it was or add the Covert Cloak with the 30 second delay (and keep the cruise missiles). They have alre...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 20:02:00
|
1592. Can the hyena get a little lovin? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The specialized web ships have suffered a lot from the Great Speed Nerf I think it would be a good idea to give 25% web strength special ability to all web ships
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 19:59:00
|
1593. The Great Speed Nerf (An Idea) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Enden Assulu That is only with heat, inties will still get omnomnomnom'd by warriors In my experience, a Stiletto with 1MN AB and medium shield extender can tank warrior IIs for a long time, while in 4km orbit Tho other i...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 19:30:00
|
1594. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Vall Kor Edited by: Vall Kor on 01/04/2009 18:45:04 Originally by: Waxau ... Ill now sit back, and repeat my age ol' arguement, of how come a hauler, meant for hauling, can warp cloaked, when a battleship, worth...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 19:24:00
|
1595. What are the best tackling ships? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Dictors are obviously best in 0.0 Of the interceptors, Stiletto is by far the best, as it has extra mid slot for fitting med shield extender - making it much more durable at close range tackle. And it has the best scan res for catching people at ...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 18:00:00
|
1596. The Great Speed Nerf (An Idea) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Artemis Rose Good lord, how does having 2pt scrams and 90% webs at 15km on every single ship FIX blaster ships? 0/10 You could do better. That definitely would do more harm than good to overall balance If you realize ...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 17:56:00
|
1597. stealth bomber - a solution that doesn't involve upsetting people - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Malin folkungs Same solution proposed for black ops. I'm not aware of Black Op changes that would warrant the need for another ship type. Unless you are refering to a cov ops cloak version - which would have significantly...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 17:48:00
|
1598. stealth bomber - a solution that doesn't involve upsetting people - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's pretty simple: leave the current Stealth Bomber as it is. Add a 'Tier 2' Stealth Bomber that focuses on torps with all the other changes proposed. Everybody likes having more ships. You don't have to **** off the people who like current ste...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 17:40:00
|
1599. The Great Speed Nerf (An Idea) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I remember DHB WildCat was one the the semi-insane people shouting in FAVOR of the nano-nerf, using his Claymore boosted high grade Snake set enhanced 4 billion isk ship setups, with overheated MWD no less. Was totally ridiculous basis for balanci...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 17:29:00
|
1600. Cover Ops cloak for Black Ops - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Malin folkungs This is obviously a given. All other recon/covert ship classes have at least 1 ship that can use the covops cloak. If anything why not just add another version of the blackops ships that can use it, and remove...
- by Ephemeron - at 2009.04.01 17:12:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |