Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
161. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Uh, POS do offer solid value for their cost. 33% increase in production volume isn't value? Do you think that's enough? Is their refining capacity where it should be? Do they provide an adequate storage solution to pe...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 20:42:00
|
162. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
arcca jeth wrote: sounds like it's time for new content that you "abandoned", oh say about a year or so ago. Give us another small piece of the WIS pie for starters, remember WIS was YOUR idea and vision CCP and you suckered in a lot of subs wi...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 20:14:00
|
163. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Seleene wrote: JON LANDER I WANT YOU TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF SOMETHING!!!!! Also, the CSM minutes will be published in the next 24-48 hours. We've been waiting on this dev blog. What is Jon Lander taking on instead of Senior Production, a...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 19:56:00
|
164. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rees Noturana wrote: How is this different from the "Jesus Features" that CCP vowed to never do again? Just smaller stuff under one common theme? What if a theme needs a really big change to make worthwhile? Nice to see you supporting the Enab...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 19:53:00
|
165. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: that is a terrible idea things being discoverable is neat Yes, things being discoverable is neat, but what should be the threshold for having to find content? Should you have to launch a probe every time you enter a system ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 19:46:00
|
166. Sticky:Dev blog: EVE Online development in 2013 and beyond - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm not generally a fan of buzzwords, but at least it looks like you're using your own for this one Regarding the idea of helping players decide what to do next, It's worth considering whether the current game design for PVE content is a good o...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2013.01.15 19:41:00
|
167. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mars Theran wrote: Question: What is available to salvage and recycle after you hit a tank with an RPG? The correct answer, is pretty much everything, though some of it may not be working, and it doesn't have to be. Bonus if it is though. We...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.28 06:22:00
|
168. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Well as I explained above the News worthiness of Null over the last year is only slightly higher than that of the CSM and the main articles being published are on things occurring in Hi-sec, such as hulkagedon has made the ma...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.28 04:55:00
|
169. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
mkint wrote: Evelgrivion wrote: Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: @Seleene Please make the CSM and CCP aware of these considerations and the suggestion at the end. Before the drone regions nerf, nullsec had more minerals available (including low e...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.28 04:25:00
|
170. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: Evelgrivion wrote: nobody ever started playing an Eve Online trial because of how amazing High Security Space is. Your pompous arrogance is showing. People that don't play the way you do are not "real" EVE players? H...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.28 04:22:00
|
171. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: @Seleene Please make the CSM and CCP aware of these considerations and the suggestion at the end. Before the drone regions nerf, nullsec had more minerals available (including low ends) in a efficient pre-compressed for...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.25 23:00:00
|
172. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dexington wrote: Evelgrivion wrote: Wormhole Space helps attract players to the game because of it's capacity to tell stories, but lets face it; nobody ever started playing an Eve Online trial because of how amazing High Security Space is. 0...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.25 11:53:00
|
173. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: So every patch has had resources devoted to Null except Inferno. Maybe you can tell me how much has just been used on Hi-sec or Wormholes in that same amount of time? I'm just going to step in and say Incursions, Mining Ba...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.25 11:23:00
|
174. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The issues described in the paper sound very similar to the points of concern and areas of interest that I've arrived at over the past few months. As a bittervet, I'm surprised by just how much I miss the prospect of major shiny features and how f...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.11.25 11:16:00
|
175. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Alice Krysta wrote: FAIL CCP "FIX" PATCH NOT LETTING CALDARI TO MAKE THEYR LP DUMP !!!!! I mean u let gallente, minmattar, and amarr take them, but why not caldari ? i'm sure minmattar can "extract" more isk outa this ... i wasted 20 days of...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.23 10:28:00
|
176. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: Well, they "fixed" the farming problem. Kinda sucks that the ninja fix fucks over everyone in some shape and/or form... For limited definitions of everyone; in this case, those running faction warfare for ISK. On the ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.23 10:07:00
|
177. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Yuri Intaki wrote: Deen Wispa wrote: BTW Mjolnir- Bolsterbomb was approached by CCP and his views were considered. There was a Skype conference call which included Bolster, Chatgris, myself, XG, Hans, MinutemanKirk, and Amymuffmuff. All mili...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.23 09:12:00
|
178. ROFL CCP is going to fast-forward the changes no LP dump - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The sheer volume of indignant rage being generated by the entitled Faction Warfare farmers is hilarious - especially since FW was meant to be a PVP feature, not a first order money maker. A sense of entitlement is not a valid rationale for arguing...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.23 08:58:00
|
179. Sticky:Dev blog: Stay on Target! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP karkur wrote: Myxx wrote: So, any way to make this something we don't need to have forced on us? I kinda like the current targeting UI atm. I would like to see it as something we are "delivering" to you, not forcing it on you We do n...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.10 20:26:00
|
180. Sticky:Dev blog: Stay on Target! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I don't like the circle indicators; the current ordered list of Shield Armor Hull is very good at conveying at a glance information; the rounded bars condenses it, but at the cost of at a glance clarity; not a worthy tradeoff, IMO. I do like the ...
- by Evelgrivion - at 2012.10.10 20:08:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |