| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah I'll prove you wrong. My gang just let go of a 12k m/s vaga as we all do less. I don't have a billion for full implants and faction fit. A good tackler frig would've got it long enough so we can put another point an...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 18:49:00
|
102. Sniper Battleships: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Semkhet To get back to the matter, why don't you try to forget the messenger and focus on the substance of the message ? I do, it is the content of the message that caused me to reply as I did. Not the messenger. Contex...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 18:27:00
|
103. Sniper Battleships: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Kelsin Dungar's point is that the same arguments that people, specifically you Goumindong, give for nano-ships being "broken" or "unfair" can be applied to other fittings that those same people do not consider broken or unfa...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 16:09:00
|
104. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Osprey Osprey should be running 3 Electron Blasters and a HAML for 238 DPS. Enyo does not fit the 2 MFS, 4 Neutrons, and a RL. It runs out of CPU for a warp scrambler[even a best named]. You have to drop down to...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 15:43:00
|
105. Sniper Battleships: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 19/05/2008 15:24:08 Originally by: Semkhet Comparative definitions allows you to define a specific entity multiple times according to the contexts you choose to include. If I would write a comparative definiti...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 15:24:00
|
106. So... is voting over yet ? Who won ? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
If you use a compulsory system the people who get involved because of it will be more likely to vote without consideration which will skew the results towards the people who like to blow sunshine up your ass. Vote Goumindong for CSM
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 14:37:00
|
107. Sniper Battleships: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Semkhet Originally by: Goumindong Sounds plausible and are plausible are entirely different things. This answer of yours is a real jewel, and I don't doubt that it is indeed honest and represents your way of defl...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 14:28:00
|
108. CSM candidates skill tree & API key - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Go back a few pages this was already requested in the form of in-eve skills. Many candidates have given that out Vote Goumindong for CSM
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 14:18:00
|
109. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah What would be the parameters of the matrix? The same parameters they are going to be for any payoff matrix. Your options and his options. Quote: A nano bc can hardly have the same ehp as a tanked hac. Ac...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 14:17:00
|
110. Sniper Battleships: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Sounds plausible and are plausible are entirely different things. Vote Goumindong for CSM
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 14:00:00
|
111. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: posteroid So if you want nanos to be nerfed by your rep vote gourmindong and if you do not vote Sariyah. But if you want to be somebody to represent you (the player) instead of their own ideas vote for neither of them. ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 12:29:00
|
112. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Or rather your optimal play style which is survive at any cost even if you spend a half day out there without shooting anything. Aha. Short answer: You not playing optimally has nothing to do with whether or not...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 11:40:00
|
113. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Primary goal is to kill. If self preservation was more important I'd stay docked in a hisec station. Also if the BS warps out he won;t be idling on a gate, he'll be switching SSs in space ==> no chance of getting...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.19 08:52:00
|
114. Question to CSM candidates: Titan Warfare? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Scatim Helicon Originally by: Jade Constantine Actual battle-reports of a 3 Titan "blob" on the live-server. Interesting background reading for candidates expressing an opinion in this thread. Maybe "goon" Titan's d...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 21:42:00
|
115. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 18/05/2008 21:41:04 Originally by: Sariyah If my gang finds a BS with 5 t1 frigs we do try to keep the BS there or there was no point going in. I can see how you lure a t1 frig away, kill it, then say nano cru...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 21:39:00
|
116. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: posteroid Originally by: Goumindong I am not asking for ships to be able to do everything you are making things up again. I am asking for ships to have ranges of fits that are useful for various things. A frigate ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 21:20:00
|
117. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 18/05/2008 18:53:30 Originally by: Sariyah Your scenario means I lost before I engaged. Like I went in to kill your rifter and punisher. Not much to fight for. Confused It only means the 2 of us fight differen...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 18:53:00
|
118. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Him or them. 1 tackler is easy to manage, never said it wasn't. Killing enemies is optimal not sitting in a safe for hours because there is a BS. What in the world are you talking about? Its not hard. When they ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 16:33:00
|
119. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Yep they are. It is not a matter of whether or not you attempt to be get away its a matter of whether or not they let you escape. Quote: Has nothing to do with the overview. Based on the overview I can't de...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 15:15:00
|
120. Speed Tanking: A litmus test for some voters.. Candidates? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Sariyah Outsmarting your enemy sometimes works, usually doesn't. I think most fights are sort of, consentual. When either both sides think they can win or they are just bored of not fighting and give it a try anyway. If...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.05.18 13:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |