| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
781. [CSM Campaign] + Story / Bounty Hunting/Transferrable Kill Rights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 26/04/2008 02:25:00 Originally by: Nemiron Originally by: Goumindong Basically players who are bidding make bids on a contract for a low-ball. I.E. The hunter to makes the LOWEST bid wins the contract ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.26 02:20:00
|
782. Gallente Boost? - in Game Development Forum [original thread]
Originally by: lecrotta Edited by: lecrotta on 26/04/2008 00:41:17 If you cannot hit nano ships cos they go too fast and close range ships suffer because they need to fit nano just to get close to other ships then not having a tank ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.26 01:01:00
|
783. Gallente Boost? - in Game Development Forum [original thread]
Originally by: James Lyrus Short range race is short range? What are the chances. The problem here isn't Gallente ships, is that the average speed of everything has got too high - and in turn, means fighting in web range hurts more - w...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.26 00:21:00
|
784. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Frug I really love the idea of turning off all your ships systems to remain 'hidden' from any counts at all. (ie I forfeit my local count to also appear hidden) Not for fleets, but for soloing. It might not be so detrimental...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 23:57:00
|
785. Nanos should be nerfed - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 25/04/2008 23:50:28 Originally by: Red Thunder 5. decent tracking...if you have the same tracking as a vaga thats orbiting you then you will kill him as he has 0 tank This exemplifies the just what is wron...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 23:50:00
|
786. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: WillageGirl What you fail to realize here, even though you say it yourself is that while gang size might be still large you have a lot more covert op's and scout and less heavy ships in your gang. This means you have less o...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 23:40:00
|
787. Titans are destroying the game. Remove the doomsday NOW. - in Game Development Forum [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy You, of all people, dont get to make this claim. That is rich, coming from you.
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 23:36:00
|
788. [CSM Campaign] + Story / Bounty Hunting/Transferrable Kill Rights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not when the idea is simple. E.G. Short and to the point: http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=756166 Long: But all relevant http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=670196 Short and to the poi...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 23:06:00
|
789. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 25/04/2008 21:42:19 Originally by: Kelsin This is precisely the point of arguing to remove Local - as it stands the lesser force can always see when a greater force enters the system because they just watch Lo...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 21:42:00
|
790. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 25/04/2008 21:13:16 Originally by: Tarminic Goumindong, I like the suggestion you made regarding replacing local with a friendly/neutral/hostile count but I'm not sure it goes far enough to reduce intel accura...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 21:13:00
|
791. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kelsin This argument is neither here nor there. If you're supposing that more ships make you more likely to win, it doesn't matter what you know about your enemy - you will always bring as many ships as you can. "as man...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 20:54:00
|
792. [CSM Campaign] + Story / Bounty Hunting/Transferrable Kill Rights - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jade Constantine ItĘs actually a pretty simple suggestion: Then why did it need 5 freaking posts? Especially when the idea has been around forever? Also its flawed. The bidding system needs to be very specific to...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 20:40:00
|
793. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Stratten no no and no. :) removing local only really benefits certain play-styles at the expense of others. Could you expand on this? What play-styles do you believe it benefits, and harms...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 20:12:00
|
794. Titans are destroying the game. Remove the doomsday NOW. - in Game Development Forum [original thread]
Originally by: HydroSan Edited by: HydroSan on 25/04/2008 02:40:14 I've reverted to using ad hominem against you because I've already written no less than three giant blocks of text and all you and the other one-man-alt-corp posters ha...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.25 19:55:00
|
795. [CSM Discussion] + Story / Removing Local - Eve Gameplay Opinions? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 24/04/2008 23:58:16 Originally by: Francis Inch Scrapping it might be great from an intel point of view, but I'm not seeing anyone putting forward suggestions on what to do about the great big hole in the soci...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 23:58:00
|
796. Nanos should be nerfed - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 24/04/2008 20:20:03 Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby ... Have you ever tried to fit a remote rep sniper gang out? Not only are you very short on powergrid, but you drop DPS and range etc in order to make th...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 20:19:00
|
797. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron One new feature that can help minimize the pain of local nerf is this: *) Allies can choose to share scanner info automatically. For example, if your alliance/fleet member is sitting on a gate and sees some hosti...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 19:53:00
|
798. Directional Scanner Improvements as a Local Replacement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Torik Tavitas Why exactly should a player know what standing a ship halfway across the system has and where would a scanner get that information? Because if they do not the game balance between hunter and hunted changes...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 19:51:00
|
799. Macros? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chr0nosX Just petitioned - it's all good aslong as it just sets off keys. Frankly i would like a GM to come in and say that publicly[or have a petition answered] before working such an action.
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 19:44:00
|
800. Nanos should be nerfed - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Marcus Druallis Yes, if this was a one on one fight between the single neuting BS and the Vagabond, in the end the vaga would leave the field and the BS would hold it. WHo wins, you tell me. BUT. It is much more likely tha...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.04.24 19:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |