EVE Search - Posts by Goumindong

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 161-180 of 7209 for by author Goumindong (0,44 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300
161. [Issue] Buff Large Autocannons (especially Dual 650mms and 800mms) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Octavio Santillian because this is not a thread about pulse lasers or blaster. I have made no arguments as to the viability of other weapon systems Everything can only be valued relatively. If you are going to say somet... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.04 06:14:00
162. [Issue] Arazu/Lachesis/Celestis/Maulus/Keres need a boost - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Edited by: Goumindong on 04/06/2008 06:01:49 We already have two "issue" threads on this Anyway, for more info on what caused the problem, see Here ED: Short answer = Boost to previous effectiveness just might overpower them.[87% damps wit... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.04 05:59:00
163. Capturable Stargates: 0.0 Sovereignty Revamp - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Goumindong on 04/06/2008 03:02:34 Originally by: Kelsin Originally by: Goumindong Why the ability to camp gates instead of the ability to siege POS? Because controlling gates with subcapitals achieves all of the ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.04 03:02:00
164. [Issue] Buff Large Autocannons (especially Dual 650mms and 800mms) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Octavio Santillian There is a problem with autocannos, and not just large ones, but it is hard to address that issue without rethinking Minmatar ships altogether. The problem is you have to throw ship bonuses, rigs, and/or ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.04 02:57:00
165. Capturable Stargates: 0.0 Sovereignty Revamp - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Kelsin I would define blobbing as having many ships on the same grid. Spreading them out across multiple grids/systems in groups of 10 certainly doesn't consitute "blobbing" in any sense. I would welcome suggestions to miti... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.04 02:48:00
166. [Issue] Re-examination of 0.0 Sovereignty System - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Kelsin Originally by: Tusko Hopkins I agree with this topic, sovereignty system needs reexamination. Another problem with sov is that 0.0 alliances usually claim far more space then they actually use, and newcomers t... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 23:37:00
167. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Alex Shurk Eve does not need fewer static combat points, it needs more. Since the removal of complexes all there has been for this is high end moons and outpost systems. There need to be more strategic objectives to take an... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 23:35:00
168. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Jade Constantine Originally by: Goumindong Bull****, you never discussed it. Hell your post in the "Look at 0.0 sov" thread is "I support this" way to have a facilitate discussion! There is only a chance in hell ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 21:07:00
169. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Jade Constantine The general conclusion was that posting issue threads in the Assembly Hall for seven day minimum was the best means of facilitating discussion. Bull****, you never discussed it. Hell your post in the ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 20:51:00
170. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Nothing being done to facilitate discussion? No word on what that template you voted on last time was? - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 20:26:00
171. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Edited by: Goumindong on 03/06/2008 20:14:56 Originally by: Jade Constantine The point is inflicting loss on the owning alliance and ensuring that AFK defense is no longer possible on the alliance territorial scale AFK defense is a... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 20:14:00
172. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Jade Constantine Originally by: Rutoo The other option would be have the station out there as a dockable station wreak or something you can interact with to recover your own assets. This is the resolution I pr... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 19:34:00
173. Remote Sensor Dampeners on bonused ships. - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Increasing damp bonuses does not work unless you change the way that bonuses are applied back to its pre-scripting method. And if you change it back to its pre-scripting method you likely don't need to change the strength of the bonuses. - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 18:35:00
174. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: SencneS If you have a truly nomadic alliance and out just out to destroy outposts or remove alliances from 0.0 space then you would not care of be interested in holding the space anyway. The fact you remove an alliance from... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 18:32:00
175. [Issue] Buff Large Autocannons (especially Dual 650mms and 800mms) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Marn Prestoc Are you being dense on purpose? I never suggested using blasters on a maelstrom (that was someone else). My point is if even a ROF bonus on AC's is behind unbonused weapon how far behind do you think it is vs ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 17:58:00
176. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Jade Constantine Well Rodj, at the moment a handful of mega-alliances hold the majority of 0.0 space. That suggests they aren't exactly struggling to hold space. No, a handful of mega-alliances have to sell off space ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 17:42:00
177. [Issue] Buff Large Autocannons (especially Dual 650mms and 800mms) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Marn Prestoc You realise that even with ROF bonus a 800mm T2 AC is lower than a unbonused neutron blaster with both behind a unbonused seige launcher. And this matters because? 800mm T2 AC on a Mael will do more damage ... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.03 01:14:00
178. No Topic - in Assembly Hall [original thread] What are we supposed to be discussing? A CSM has already supported it, there is no reason to needlessly stick thumbs up in the thread, you all get to vote on it. Are we going to have a discussion as required or are you going to vote to have a dis... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.02 22:23:00
179. [issue] The feasibility of destructible player-built outposts in Eve - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Originally by: Yorda Why would you ever blow up something you could take? It doesn't make any sense. Actually, the way it's phrased, you would be blowing up something you already have taken. Wra... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.02 22:05:00
180. [Issue] Re-examination of 0.0 Sovereignty System - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Edited by: Goumindong on 02/06/2008 21:59:17 Originally by: Kelsin The word dynamic (and the made up noun-form I'm using here, dynamism) is very appropriate: the proposal to re-examine 0.0 sovereignty is in response to an overly static... - by Goumindong - at 2008.06.02 21:59:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.