Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. [Balance] Inertia Stabilizers oversized warpspeed improvement - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: murder one Originally by: Aeaus Hurricane 6 x Local Hull Conversion Inertial Stabalizer I Y-T8 MWD Spaceship V Evasive V LG Snake Alpha LG Snake Beta LG Snake Delta LG Snake Epsilon CY-2 Zor's Custom Navigation H...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.14 00:43:00
|
2. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Grimpak on 02/11/2006 22:17:26 Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne one possible idea for our tankers would really be to make them more like the nyxus-abaddon: 1 good bonus to lasers (dmg or range for example) and the 5% armor resis...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 22:16:00
|
3. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne Originally by: Grimpak I don't consider the arbitrator as mainstray of the amarr fleet... as far as t1 crusiers go it is _the_ amarrian combat vessel. unless you know exactly what you're up against...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 21:28:00
|
4. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne not all is lost though: while browsing the ships i found that at least the prophecy already has a fitting description: "it was determined after mixed fleet engagements with early prototypes that the Prophecy wo...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 21:18:00
|
5. Tuxford making 3 months of training worthless, he deserve's his C4 - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Black Scorpio Originally by: Grimpak while a nerf to T2 long range ammo is welcome (specially jav torps), I still think that spike/tremor/aurora should maintain same damage and have range bonus nerfed to the same as ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 21:12:00
|
6. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Grimpak on 02/11/2006 21:06:33 Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne if this truely was the case (and according to tux the devs themself have no idea what amarr is supposed to be) amarr has a badly broken core concept . like i wrote...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 21:00:00
|
7. Tuxford making 3 months of training worthless, he deserve's his C4 - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
while a nerf to T2 long range ammo is welcome (specially jav torps), I still think that spike/tremor/aurora should maintain same damage and have range bonus nerfed to the same as iron/carbon lead/radio (60% instead 100%). ------- Originally ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 19:44:00
|
8. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Forsch Originally by: Jim McGregor Yes. As I see it, half of the Caldari ships are hybrid ships, so I wouldnt say its very different to what they already have. Amarr has 1 drone ship in the Arbi, but most of their sh...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 19:41:00
|
9. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne adding a bs sized arbi and giving one of the gallente bs a dampener range bonus isnt going to push the races towards uniformity. ecm, td and sd are still 3 very different forms of ewar with very different appli...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.02 08:47:00
|
10. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne for amarr the role most obviously missing is a ewar-support bs. hence you get people calling for this particular type of ship instead of yet another fleetship. one should ask however: is the Ewar BS a rol...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.11.01 03:15:00
|
11. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Grimpak on 30/10/2006 14:37:33 Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 30/10/2006 13:45:42 Originally by: Grimpak in the drones + blasters thing, one thing we can be sure that both are excellent short ra...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.30 14:26:00
|
12. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Grimpak on 30/10/2006 12:52:50 Originally by: Aramendel As said, you cannot put missles and rails in the same pot, just as you cannot put drones and blasters in the same pot. in the drones + blasters thing, one thing we ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.30 12:52:00
|
13. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel more stuff while I see your point, I do not belive that the other 3 races have Ewar as one of their core aspects, as much as caldari anyways. Caldari are high-tech, shield tanking, space-superiority ships tha...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.30 12:22:00
|
14. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne lotsa stuff exactly. The amarr concept is, at first sight, pretty simple and doesn't have many flaws: big hulks of super-armored ships with hard-hitting powerfull lasers, while sacrificing electronics and...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.30 01:04:00
|
15. Tier 2 Battlecruiser discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Nebuli Cant believe I read someone say why dont tech 2 drones have stacking negatives like tech 2 ammo, all I can say is... Counter with, why dont your tech 2 turrets and launchers have stacking negatives? well, ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.29 22:39:00
|
16. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Grimpak on 29/10/2006 22:36:48 Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 29/10/2006 15:13:59 Originally by: Grimpak because, tbh, it's the only race where we can see that there is a gap in the battleships ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.29 22:36:00
|
17. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Tharrn Could anyone explain to me why only Caldari should be allowed to have diversity? It would be a good thing (tm) if EVERY race would get a ship that fills a role that is currently not covered IMVHO. because, tbh, i...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.29 10:46:00
|
18. Tier 2 Battlecruiser discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Edited by: Goumindong on 27/10/2006 20:42:51 Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Nyxus Harbinger: Originally by: Goumingdog According to Toaster Oven, the damage difference between A...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.27 20:44:00
|
19. Tier 2 Battlecruiser discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Nyxus Harbinger: Originally by: Goumingdog According to Toaster Oven, the damage difference between A T2 fitted Harbinger fitting Heavy Pulses and a T2 fitted Hurricane fitting 220's is about 4% DPS in favor of the...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.27 20:36:00
|
20. Tier 3 Battleships discussion - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Nyxus The Abaddon, as Uldyr & Crew have already pointed out, the overall ship concept needs a slight rework. I agree with them, they are right. +dam over +rof for starters. But aside from all that, it has another issue that ...
- by Grimpak - at 2006.10.27 19:45:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |