Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
21. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Also, since you reappeared to spout some more bullshit, why don't you let us know why disenfranchising bloc voters is okay, please.
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 17:52:00
|
22. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: CD-STV is an attempt to address former Chairman Mittani's concerns.. Good joke dude!
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 17:51:00
|
23. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dramaticus wrote: While we're at it lets make MInmatar only get 3/5ths of a vote. Damn, son.
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 17:15:00
|
24. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Lord Zim wrote: So you're going to make sure Trebor catches all the flak for this one, and you'll swivel your cape to catch the most wind, despite the fact you came in guns blazing to defend the thread initially? ...
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 17:05:00
|
25. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Were you against this suggestion? How many months have you guys spent on drafting this? Did you guys really think it wasn't gameable? We've had some brief internal discussion about it, but the bot...
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 16:41:00
|
26. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Now I eagerly await Hans coming back stating that he doesn't represent the CSM as a whole. Don't let me down, Hans.
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 16:37:00
|
27. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Haquer wrote: Know what else is frustrating? You skirting every post asking you why disenfranchising voters is a good idea. I didn't realize that I said that disenfranchising voters was a good idea.... You as ...
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 16:35:00
|
28. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Good point. Good point. I can understand how that would be frustrating. Know what else is frustrating? You skirting every post asking you why disenfranchising voters is a good idea. E: Heh, nice edit dude
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 16:30:00
|
29. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: I just wanted to state, for the record, that I could give no ****'s whether a Goon is elected to a future CSM. They represent a large portion of the active, involved player base, and most people would agree that if they...
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 15:10:00
|
30. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Goons would probably be better served engaging in that discussion rather than inventing things to tinfoil hat about. Nah, we're instead discussing in our jabber channels how best to get multiple candidates on board a...
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 14:46:00
|
31. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Yeah, this totally won't backfire when the candidates end up working together instead of the voters.
- by Haquer - at 2012.09.08 13:55:00
|
32. Big war in the North - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve Online
- by Haquer - at 2012.08.18 17:36:00
|
33. Aeon 4 Sale - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Incoming HBC drama over an idiot selling supers on the open market~
- by Haquer - at 2012.08.16 14:22:00
|
34. DEV RESPONCE REQUESTED: Amarr Rookie ships and cynos - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ps3ud0nym wrote: ITT: many people show they don't know how to read. DEV response requested. Not pubbie sperg wanted. Tribal Band member calling people pubbies? Nice one! I remember you from TEST jabber. You are the biggest sperg on the int...
- by Haquer - at 2012.08.09 20:10:00
|
35. Supercapitals and billions - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
A++++ would read again
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.30 15:19:00
|
36. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wow you got us good. Tell me more about hording isotopes, please.
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.27 21:42:00
|
37. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Actually, his name is Hammer Legion Member, but he signs his posts HML, so I guess I was right on the sig being for heavy misl launchers
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.27 21:39:00
|
38. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
regards, HML
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.27 21:38:00
|
39. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
heavy misl launcher, you see
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.27 21:38:00
|
40. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: I took a moment to review the actual math behind plat tech alchemy, and I'm posting my findings below. :siren: MATH TIME :siren: The prevalence of cobalt and platinum dictates that, over time, plat tech alchemy will ...
- by Haquer - at 2012.07.27 03:40:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |