Pages: [1] 2 |
1. What do you call a player in a State Raven with full Estamel gear ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tron Flux Originally by: JitaBum You seem to be seriously missing the point here 1) They can buy ships, without taking part in the eve economy 2) There is talk of the ability to buy skillpoints 3) Gold ammo, store e...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.10 09:41:00
|
2. What do you call a player in a State Raven with full Estamel gear ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yseri Originally by: Ilmunel if you wanna try smth you dont have to wait, just buy PLEXs, buy high sp char with titan and you are there, so CCP doesn't need to change anything for it to happen:) That's one wa...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.10 06:02:00
|
3. What do you call a player in a State Raven with full Estamel gear ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 09/07/2011 21:27:38 Originally by: Yseri Wow, you people are so high on your horses that you can't see the earth anymore. While most of your points are completely valid, you amount to what, 5% of the player base? ...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.09 21:26:00
|
4. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: HyperZerg I have 3 questions regarding this whole debate. 1. Why MT in the first place ? Greed? just cus peole will pay more to play, they'll pay for their subscription as well as for smth else in game, and developers...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.03 14:56:00
|
5. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel PLEX for remaps and other non "in-game things" are frankly grey areas. They're not gold ammo or ships or pay to win. I think it is healthy to have the ability to discuss those, because some of them can fra...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.03 14:27:00
|
6. Special Ingame Channel for Monocle Owners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 01/07/2011 06:52:18 Edited by: Ilmunel on 01/07/2011 06:51:50 Originally by: Comy 1 Originally by: Karthwritte I wonder how many monocles guys actually operate with bots and macros. Because affordi...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.01 06:51:00
|
7. Special Ingame Channel for Monocle Owners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Taius Pax I don't want to live on this planet anymore. oh why?, i think those cyno alts look perfect:)
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.01 06:38:00
|
8. Special Ingame Channel for Monocle Owners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 01/07/2011 06:34:27 yeah faceless are top elite chars
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.01 06:31:00
|
9. Special Ingame Channel for Monocle Owners - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
aren't you all, guys with monocle, elite cyno alts? , ill buy one alt, so waiting for proposals
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.07.01 06:25:00
|
10. CSM meeting started - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ccp dont want to answer main question, so i think they decided to go beyond vanity items, and csm will be used to tell it us
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.30 16:00:00
|
11. Icelandic Question; Is Google Translate Accurate? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
eve wont collapse immediatly, they still should bring there non vanity mt, and brake with it game mechanics, and it still may be alive for a year or two, just enogh to squeese money frome eve and dust players and then forget about them, so maybe t...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.28 20:38:00
|
12. IS THERE ANY POINT..... IN PLAYING? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chogon Toil Or.... maybe... MTs won't destroy the game like we think. CCP will tweak them to work better. Dust will do well. CCP's revenue will increase. WoD will get made. WoD will do well. EvE, WoD, and Dust 514 all bring ...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.28 18:42:00
|
13. Stop the rage - embrace the change - participate in shaping the future - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 28/06/2011 16:57:12 Edited by: Ilmunel on 28/06/2011 16:56:50 Edited by: Ilmunel on 28/06/2011 16:55:29 Originally by: Javja Originally by: Robert Mason While im not suffering the rage felt by many...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.28 16:54:00
|
14. CCP sell shares to the eve community!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i'm for it
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.28 16:18:00
|
15. Incarna's CQ is a technological marvel, so STFU whingers! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Toovhon I don't know how you managed it CCP, but somehow you pulled off what has to be the most audacious programming feat in 3D development in the industry. You made a closet sized 3D space that runs 1000x hotter and slo...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.28 04:29:00
|
16. GIVE IDEAS for NON-vanity, NON-advantage items and services for AUR ! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
almost all these ideas still influence gameplay, i would like to remove these aur completely from the game
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.27 05:15:00
|
17. (Possibly dumb idea) Vanity blueprints instead of vanity items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 27/06/2011 05:09:29 Originally by: The Offerer Spawn non-vanity item BPCs and you've destroyed: researching, POSes, Ice mining (POS fuel), Planetary Interaction (POS fuel + POS modules are made of PI materials), D...
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.27 05:09:00
|
18. how to make arum awesome and boost industry!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
for plex to appear in game somebody have to pay real money
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.27 00:21:00
|
19. how to make arum awesome and boost industry!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ilmunel on 27/06/2011 00:16:07 for aurum to appear in game, somebody have to spend real money, you cant make them with isk
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.27 00:15:00
|
20. Quite happy with AUR :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
its still not enough buy yurself monocle :D better two :D
- by Ilmunel - at 2011.06.27 00:08:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |