Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1. WTS [Private] 191M SP character - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Character transfer in progress now!
- by Inspiration - at 2015.09.30 19:11:29
|
2. WTS [Private] 191M SP character - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Necessary details received. Character transfer will be arranged in a moment.
- by Inspiration - at 2015.09.30 19:07:09
|
3. WTS [Private] 191M SP character - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Lovebuggy wrote: I will buy this toon. Bid accepted. Please eve-mail the account name and 100M to this character as per bazaar rules and I can initiate the transfer.
- by Inspiration - at 2015.09.30 19:02:29
|
4. WTS [Private] 191M SP character - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
I am selling Inspiration (me). This is a private sale explicitly meant for a friend and only claimable by ... . This character has: * Positive security rating * 100M+ in wallet * Is currently located in Aeschee (Low sec 0.2) * Has no kill ri...
- by Inspiration - at 2015.09.30 18:53:44
|
5. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rhaegal wrote: CCP is lying to us. Patch notes implied an extremely trivial change but we are now into 9 hours of fail. Seems like they could have rolled back but, given the length of this downtime, even that option is futile. Crock of Crap ...
- by Inspiration - at 2015.07.15 20:13:13
|
6. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Garnoo wrote: CCP killed eve... much faster than expected :D They have been trying it for years, but the population is so stubborn!
- by Inspiration - at 2015.07.15 19:55:08
|
7. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Agent Unknown wrote: Inspiration wrote: I always say EVE is still in BETA after 10 years as there is a downtime each day. No sensible game developer would allow this in a release version and have it dominate the game play. Last week I saw t...
- by Inspiration - at 2015.07.15 19:51:41
|
8. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I always say EVE is still in BETA after 10 years as there is a downtime each day. No sensible game developer would allow this in a release version and have it dominate the game play. Last week I saw this confirmed in something so simple as not ri...
- by Inspiration - at 2015.07.15 19:27:43
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: The Price of Change - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Insane that the price of the output is taken as a factor in the cost of producing said output. There is no reason to pay more for an activity unless someone else is willing to pay more for the same workforce supply. What the end product is should ...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.30 23:26:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thead Enco wrote: What if CCP made it possible to launch bombs in empire......... Pointless to speculate about that.
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.15 22:23:00
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
gifter Penken wrote: Sad MonkeySpanker wrote: gifter Penken wrote: ... The new "scale price to usage" price mechanism for slots is likely going ito make copy slots prohibitively expensive. The alt corp with large POS is going to be the c...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.15 20:40:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
gifter Penken wrote: Captain StringfellowHawk wrote: Death to the Casuals... Especially the ones that complain with every single change to the game... I know this is somewhat hyperbole, but death to casual players would be death to EV...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.15 20:27:00
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I think I like most of what is in the blog! Have to give it a bit more time to process tho, more detail will be available when the next blog arrives. Any ETA on that one?
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.15 20:25:00
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Giving Drones and Assist - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Based on an earlier point raised by Tippia about the way the sentry drones differ and still make two factions drones the underdog. I see a simple way out of this: Gallente & Caldari sentry drones Close range focus, equally high damage, ex...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.05 11:11:00
|
15. Sticky:Dev Blog: Giving Drones and Assist - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Based on an earlier point raised by Tippia about the way the combat drones differ and still make two factions drones the underdog. I see a simple way out of this: Gallente & Caldari combat drones Close range focus, equally high damage, eq...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.05 11:06:00
|
16. Sticky:Dev Blog: Giving Drones and Assist - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I LOVE IT!
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.04 19:39:00
|
17. Sticky:Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Inspiration wrote: The reason to bring up POS / corporation was to have the user of compression facilities have exposure to PvP. Only corporation members can use the facility and being in a war, pretty much excludes use...i...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.03 21:53:00
|
18. Sticky:Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: Vhelnik Cojoin wrote: If someone is daft enough to dec us due to the POS, then we will use the 24 hour ramp up to build a Goonswarm Federation approved D!ckstar(TM): Large Caldari POS, 13(?) appropriate hardeners to achieve ne...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.03 21:50:00
|
19. Sticky:Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Inspiration wrote: You are not reading, just a mere few posts ago i demonstrated using current game mechanics it is not safe. It can be taken out, you cannot simply retract it and get away with it if the enemy party is prep...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.03 21:40:00
|
20. Sticky:Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: The context of this whole thing was an existing, built-up corporation, not a new player. You were insinuating that players that had taken the time to train Anchoring, were willing to pay the POS fuel cost, and have the standings n...
- by Inspiration - at 2014.04.03 21:31:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |