EVE Search - Posts by Jade Constantine

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 181-200 of 11272 for by author Jade Constantine (0,70 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500
181. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] James Amril-Kesh wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: I received perma-war from the Swarm for basically being their most hated player in the game bar none (mostly for not being impressed by Mittani's fanfest antics). You must have been quite ... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.05 12:25:00
182. Why do you alt post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Kuehnelt wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: I doubt this happens, really. Goonswarm and other 0.0 alliances frankly don't care what you think of them, and they aren't going to get mad if you call them evil blobbers, devil spawn, or whatever crea... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.05 00:49:00
183. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: This is a baldfaced lie. 1.0 was a wardec patch which was supposed to be with mercs in mind, it just failed miserably because of the allies mechanic loophole which a lot of wardecced corps/alliances ended up abusing. 1.1 clos... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 19:12:00
184. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Werst Dendenahzees wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Richard Desturned wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Why is it everytime you are presented with an argument you can't answer you end up posting 3 completely content-free posts? You have al... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 17:53:00
185. Power of my faith overcomes all dark magic - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] Vaari wrote: Today my list of glorious victories saw another triumphnant victory. As you all know, GM brotherhood cast a curse upon me, which prevented my ship computers to contact this central forum of the galnet. Today, after rigorous pray... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 17:04:00
186. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: I find it interesting how you removed the "But nary a word about mercs." bit from my quote, I guess it's because you're all out of arguments, and have to go back to your usual deflection routine. I tend to skip an awful lot ... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 16:42:00
187. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: This is funny. Back when you were abusing the system, 1.0 was "fine". When the 1.1 changes came about, you went ranting and raving about how "CCP caved to goons", "goons whined to CCP" and various other tinfoily things, despite... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 13:27:00
188. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: The new system allows for mercs to be protection mercs through using ingame mechanics, this is new. The old style merc is still possible through out of game deals, and the price increases for things like POS/CO shoots are negli... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.04 00:06:00
189. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Richard Desturned wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Why is it everytime you are presented with an argument you can't answer you end up posting 3 completely content-free posts? You have already admitted you got your other forum account permaban... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 23:28:00
190. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: That's what the fix is about, and this has been told, to you, multiple times, and trying to twist it into being about "protecting large alliances" is deliberately missing the point. That is precisely how its perceived by mos... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 22:45:00
191. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: ... and, if people like you and Issler etc hadn't abused the system, then it wouldn't have been changed. However, it was abused from the get-go by everyone to basically completely removing the demand for paid mercenaries. T... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 21:37:00
192. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Why is it everytime you are presented with an argument you can't answer you end up posting 3 completely content-free posts? You have already admitted you got your other forum account permabanned for bad posting - don't you think you have a lesson... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 19:08:00
193. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Werst Dendenahzees wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: Lord Zim wrote: We didn't become "top dog" because of moongoo, and moon cartels became a reality more than a year after we reached the position of "top dog". No nope. Obviously we will... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 18:04:00
194. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: We didn't become "top dog" because of moongoo, and moon cartels became a reality more than a year after we reached the position of "top dog". No nope. Obviously we will agree to disagree. From your perspective you probably f... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 15:41:00
195. 10 trillion isk to ally? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Vimsy Vortis wrote: CCP Paradox wrote: I derped because I didn't know you were referencing Jade's war specifically. If I knew that, I would have just said that this is working as intended. Except there are several people I know who have be... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 13:28:00
196. 10 trillion isk to ally? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Lapine Davion wrote: Jade Constantine wrote: CCP Paradox wrote: I derped because I didn't know you were referencing Jade's war specifically. If I knew that, I would have just said that this is working as intended. We should probably no... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 12:59:00
197. 10 trillion isk to ally? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] CCP Paradox wrote: I derped because I didn't know you were referencing Jade's war specifically. If I knew that, I would have just said that this is working as intended. We should probably note that there are A LOT more wars than mine current... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 12:46:00
198. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: [ Moongoo didn't make the NC invincible, why should it make us invincible? Because NC didn't NAP with most of the rest of 0.0. You guys realized that moon-mineral-cartels were inevitable and running the distribution and disbu... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 12:33:00
199. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Kyle Myr wrote: All I hear is you admitting you can't do anything about us except talk, and even then you don't make any sense. Well got to bring you back to the point that you declared war on me! Its not my job to do "something about you" ... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 12:21:00
200. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Kyle Myr wrote: If you wanted to do some actual damage, you could: a) Organize an alliance and take our space Not really interested in the scale of alliance required to do that kind of thing (if indeed its even possible in the post moon-go... - by Jade Constantine - at 2012.07.03 03:30:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.