| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
4runner wrote: Have full Local in 1.0-0.5 , 3 minute refresh rate in 0.4-0.1 and no local in 0.0 and WH You're not adding anything new to the discussion. You're just repeating the same stupid mantra that's been shot down several times.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 17:50:00
|
2. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Logan Brewster wrote: Quote: Did you notice you stated on fact in a post that has a solution for it? "CCP can't force all alliances to adopt NRDS and the shift in gameplay expectations that comes with it, but they can remove local on null, ...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 17:29:00
|
3. skills,training time and you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Assuming you didn't stop training, if you have no implants and the worst possible remap for the entire year, you'd come out at just 13,402,800 SP at the end of the year.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 16:09:00
|
4. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: (1), (3), (4) yes these are UI issues. What of that? Should the way we're presented with information be better? Are you saying local isn't horribly presented intel? I say it's merely what we're used to and nothing more than th...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 15:24:00
|
5. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why shouldn't ganks be avoidable? Making it unavoidable is just dumbing the game down in the opposite direction - it'll be even easier for gankers than it is now, so many of them will just get bored and quit.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 15:10:00
|
6. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ramona McCandless wrote: The issue is that many believe it makes non-consentual pvp impossible They're entirely wrong about that.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 14:35:00
|
7. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: I'm sure all these people ratting in nullsec are still going to rat in nullsec just to be your easy prey when local is removed. There's no way they'd move to other areas of the game where they wouldn't...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 14:33:00
|
8. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm sure all these people ratting in nullsec are still going to rat in nullsec just to be your easy prey when local is removed. There's no way they'd move to other areas of the game where they wouldn't have to put up with bullshit mechanics that m...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 03:08:00
|
9. Son Banned for Botting & All Tunes Used in Same House Banned Too - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Garon Gaulle wrote: CCP refuses to acknowledge that they did any thing wrong: Because they didn't.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 02:19:00
|
10. Looking for an impartial view of the null sec war going on - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BoBoZoBo wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: If the goons lose this war, and lose a large percentage territory and income streams, you can bet that their CSM reps will start applying serious pressure to CCP to change t...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.18 00:18:00
|
11. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Stetson Eagle wrote: 1) delayed local 2) make directional scanner alert when a ship is in range. filters per d-scan range and ship allegiance; friendly ships bypass alert by derived standings if you set so in filters. Basi...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 18:46:00
|
12. Best Sci-fi movie to date... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stami Baby wrote: Firefly Serenity Aliens Prometheus Wait, what? How could you possibly think Prometheus was a good movie, much less "best sci-fi movie to date"? It's probably one of the worst movies I've ever paid to go see. Firefly isn't ...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 18:37:00
|
13. Best Sci-fi movie to date... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Star Trek: The Motion Picture Just kidding, that film is absolutely awful.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 18:30:00
|
14. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Derath Ellecon wrote: Crazy thought, and I don't know if this has been explicitly mentioned before. But what if instead of local, the lowest level of chat you could get to was constellation? that channel already exists, although most people c...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 18:22:00
|
15. Looking for an impartial view of the null sec war going on - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: If the goons lose this war, and lose a large percentage territory and income streams, you can bet that their CSM reps will start applying serious pressure to CCP to change the game mechanics to something that weakens th...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 16:57:00
|
16. This is Tranquility - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"2500 GHz worth of processing power" Uh, no, that's not how computers work. GJ PCGamer.
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 16:40:00
|
17. time dilation problem ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Explorer wrote: Azami Nevinyrall wrote: I'm having similar problems, earlier I was in a fleet, each jump caused TiDi to jump up to 80% in some cases. 90-100 people jumping around shouldn't cause this, with client freezing (and in some ...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 15:46:00
|
18. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TheGunslinger42 wrote: There are two issues. One is local, the other is the nullbear. Local, I feel, provides too much intel for too little (ie zero) effort. You know someone has entered your system before they've even finished jumping the gat...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 15:01:00
|
19. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stetson Eagle wrote: 1) delayed local 2) make directional scanner alert when a ship is in range. filters per d-scan range and ship allegiance; friendly ships bypass alert by derived standings if you set so in filters. Dscan doesn't include cl...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 15:01:00
|
20. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TheGunslinger42 wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: Jack Miton wrote: The problem with local is that roughly 90% of people in nullsec pos/dock up if there are more than 3 other people in local. Basically it's free intel which causes people to ...
- by James Amril-Kesh - at 2013.06.17 14:59:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |