Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Idea to for allowing capital ships in high security space - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Let them in. The foundation is laid what with restrictions to their modules,CONCORD insta kill and Citadel incoming damage limit (the wave of the future). Some of you give these big fat things entirely too much credit. The abuse spoken of however ...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2016.07.09 05:55:38
|
2. Sticky:Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
May I get an activation please?
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2016.07.05 12:14:52
|
3. New Star - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've had a habit of looking 360 degree in search of cynos and bad **** trying to kill me due to many years of using a default overview. I'm not alone. So yeah this bright thing stands out,not quite as much as the one prior to wormholes but still i...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.11.27 04:53:50
|
4. There was an error while validating your account, please try again.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Same error message here though it shows 95 players online. Odd.
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.13 02:30:32
|
5. There was an error while validating your account, please try again.. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Same error message here though it shows 95 players online. Odd.
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.13 02:30:00
|
6. Sticky:The 'one-line bad idea' thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Allow The Mittani full developer access to EVE. NOTE: This may or may not be a bad idea.
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.08 13:26:00
|
7. 250km Bubble Deployable to Encourage Mining in Low/Null - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I had this vision of bombers and recons just doing what they already do and bridging on top of the mining op....not a horrible idea OP, it'll stop a bad or opportunistic hunter but it won't stop a group of pros. I never understood why bubbles aren...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.06 05:06:00
|
8. Update the Auto Reject system - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hey it worked! Had to start new topic 3 times before it accepted it,now watch it suddenly double post...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.06 04:11:00
|
9. Update the Auto Reject system - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Following the LRJ threadnaught and abreast an Ark I saw rushing past me up the white capped tsunami of tears there went an idea trying to stay afloat...the idea that the chat invitation system is dated and needs some attention. The Reject Invitat...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.06 04:10:00
|
10. Carriers in HiSec - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zimmer Jones wrote: Now, I'd love to see what kind of dps the concorduken has, one problem with my wanting to see caps in highsec is their use in wars. slowcat fleets would have nothing on the wargriefers camping undocks. CONCORD can and wil...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.06 02:36:00
|
11. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
smokeydapot wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Skydell wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Zhul Chembull wrote: For combat do what you will. For logistics lets think it through a bit better. I predict the bigger null sec alliances will move close to hig...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.10.03 19:05:00
|
12. Industry players--Travel Advisory--Uedama system--do not autopilot. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Fly smarter and give your kill rights to someone who will use them.
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2014.09.24 00:54:00
|
13. Inventing ships and multi-run BPCs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Elena Thiesant wrote: JohnPaulJones wrote: Anything less than a max run T1 BPC will only yield a single run T2 BPC regardless of decryptor. That is not true for ships or rigs. A 1-run T1 BPC when invented with a +2 run decryptor results...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2013.08.26 06:38:00
|
14. Inventing ships and multi-run BPCs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Assuming the BPC is of a ship worth inventing then yes put it on the contract page,inventors do not care about ME/PE. And unless I read the last post incorrectly the number of runs on the T1 BPC DOES effect the final number of runs a decryptor wou...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2013.08.25 18:46:00
|
15. Invention Chance of Success - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Yes lvl 5 skills make a diffference. One thing to know,do not mix success chances. Do not mix high chance items with low chance items,if you deviate from this expect heavy losses. Pick an item and run with it and while you are at it,use every inve...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2013.08.15 17:17:00
|
16. Which Ship would you like to see remodelled? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Of all the ships that need love its the Moa and Eagle. If they were half as vicious as what they resemble it would be a great boat.. Angler Fish
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2013.08.06 15:59:00
|
17. Which Ship would you like to see remodelled? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kara Corvinus wrote: all combat command to have the tier 2 models. Absolution = harbinger EOS = myrm Nighthawk = drake slephnir = hurricane Agreed 100%
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2013.08.06 15:54:00
|
18. Price Check on JohnPaulJones - in Price Checks [original thread]
Edited by: JohnPaulJones on 25/08/2011 22:33:50 http://eveboard.com/pilot/JohnPaulJones 6 years in game I think its time for a change. Out with the old and in with something new. JPJ isnt perfect but meh he was usefull to me and maybe he'll...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2011.08.25 22:33:00
|
19. Seeking basic science toon - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Edited by: JohnPaulJones on 11/02/2011 22:17:23 I'm looking for a very basic science toon. The toon needs advanced lab op 4 and no standing to any faction. I'm looking to spend no more than 600 mil for this but I'll go a bit higher depending u...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2011.02.11 22:14:00
|
20. Escort Carrier - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The current carrier is actually an escort carrier and the lowest tier. I couldnt see a smaller carrier being of use over a Navy Dominix or of use on any battlefield it might be fielded upon without being too weak and too costly for the DPS being d...
- by JohnPaulJones - at 2011.02.05 12:13:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |