EVE Search - Posts by Karlemgne

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 1862 for by author Karlemgne (1,88 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1. A PvP'ers Manifesto - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Kil'Roy Originally by: Mankirks Wife I joined right at the start of Rev. II, and all I have to say from my own experience is that nobody whines louder, harder, or more eloquently than empire PvPers. Didn't you me... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.04 06:12:00
2. A PvP'ers Manifesto - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I'm a pirate, a pvper, and an all around asshat in game and have been since my third day in game, well over two years ago now. What can I say about this post? Yes. Some of what you say is true... but its never that simple. As is usually the case... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.04 06:08:00
3. HUGE Macro Hauler area. Massive economy damage. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Lubomir Penev Originally by: Karlemgne Wow! You just "found" Ingunn? No ****ing way!? Look at all of those haulers!? In all seriousness though, almost everyone in eve who pays attention to isk farmers knows about I... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.02 18:20:00
4. Thank you Concord for over 700mil(first scam) - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] Originally by: ssffaa stuff The only thing I got out of this whole thread is that you fit a Rokh with torpedo launchers... oh the humanity. -Karl - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.02 15:46:00
5. HUGE Macro Hauler area. Massive economy damage. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Wow! You just "found" Ingunn? No ****ing way!? Look at all of those haulers!? In all seriousness though, almost everyone in eve who pays attention to isk farmers knows about Ingunn, and has for over a year. This isn't big news. - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.02 15:26:00
6. Hammerfall Industries demands of banning these macro-haulers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] This just in... who gives a **** about what Hammerfall industries wants? Hammerfall industries is actually more annoying than macros, especially when they pay noobs to spam the forums with the "hammerfall industries powns" threads that can be see... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.09.02 15:17:00
7. Why we need a significant BOOST to L4 missions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I'm a pirate, and I say bullshit to this. There is nothing wrong with high-sec level 4s. People are *****ing because there aren't enough targets? Its not as simple as that. -Karlemgne - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.29 05:08:00
8. Ganked in 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Flipping cans in 1.0 systems is actually petitionable. Its considered griefing by GMs. -Karl - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.28 22:38:00
9. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Boo on you CCP. The Veldnaught and Hi-sec capitals should have been removed long ago. Rules should be universally applied in game. That you caved to the popular old schooler who owned the Veldnaught, and the collective crying whining forum communi... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.27 21:25:00
10. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: LaVista Vista Dear CCP. I hope for you that this actually makes a different beyond upsetting the community. It better cure 2 types of cancer and solve all lag. Else, this is a horrible horrible move which in my eyes, shoul... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.27 21:17:00
11. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Really? To be completely honest, who gives a shit? Why is this worth 30 pages? Capital ships aren't allowed in hi-sec. Until recently, the ones that were left in high-sec had been grandfathered in... Why is it a big deal that CCP is just applying... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.27 21:13:00
12. New expansions or more work on lag? a vote? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I vote you go away and stop with this nonsensical "fix lag first" crap. Thanks, Karlemgne - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.21 18:59:00
13. Bombardment dessy (new t2 dessy idear) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Karlemgne Originally by: notaforumalt we have stealth bombers, so why not add a 4 siege launcher dessy that has a bonus to torp range and dmg. make it nanoable to get some good speed a... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.19 08:12:00
14. Lost my Golem to Hammerfall Industries - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] Hamefall industries pays people to make these inane threads. This is lame really on so many levels... and its even lamer now that half of the people who post on the forums know they do it, yet they continue to "inspire" newb spamming of the forums. - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.18 18:28:00
15. Veto set to move to a galaxy far Far away! - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] Originally by: Verone Edited by: Verone on 11/08/2008 15:25:17 Originally by: Amberly Coteaz Thanks to a brilliant strategic move by Veto, their enemies have now been left dazzled and humiliated. Spies report the new date for... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.18 18:26:00
16. Bombardment dessy (new t2 dessy idear) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: notaforumalt we have stealth bombers, so why not add a 4 siege launcher dessy that has a bonus to torp range and dmg. make it nanoable to get some good speed and what not. just an idea There already are tech 2 destroye... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.18 18:04:00
17. Crews aboard ships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny They drones, that's why they called fighter drones... the thing that looks like a pilot is just an optical illusion from some swamp gas reflecting the light from one of the moons They are not "drone... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.15 01:44:00
18. You're on a roll CCP, now ban scamming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Alz Shado I am a member of the CCP development team, and will take your suggestion into careful consideration if you send me 1,000,000,000 isk as a sign of your commitment to this issue. Thank you. Actually impersonatin... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.06 20:46:00
19. You're on a roll CCP, now ban scamming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] How about we ban forum whiners who suicide gank in game, while telling their victims about the fact that there is "risk" in high-sec, while complaining that a little risk has been added to the eve pvp-easy mode that has been the suicide gankers li... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.06 18:34:00
20. Thanks for caving in CCP. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sorry I couldn't make out what you were saying through all the crying. Were you complaining that it now might actually cost you 30 million isk to try and suicide gank someone? Because if you were, wow. I mean just wow. Who cares? Just be more dis... - by Karlemgne - at 2008.08.06 18:12:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.