| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 |
1781. Wormhole Corporation - What Should I Look For? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I actually recommend jumping in feet first and joining a reputable C5/C6 WH corp. There's some really reputable WH corps out there with some real WH veterans. -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 18:21:00
|
1782. Faction Battlecruisers - Would they work? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Asssassin X wrote: Wait a second here, your comparing only one command ship to legion, what aboutt he damnation which fits better tank, than the legion ever will and also can fit the same amount of missle dps as the legion if not using ganglin...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 18:14:00
|
1783. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The large span of time that Eve lore covers... and by that you mean powering an entire galaxy on the other side of the Eve gate before it died? ;-) -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:49:00
|
1784. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: How do you know it was a carrier's worth of light drones? I'm well familiar with the tactic. It takes *a lot* of drones and a significant amount of work setting them up to consistently decloak people. A far better ta...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:26:00
|
1785. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
stoicfaux wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: stoicfaux, that assumes that there isn't an incredible amount of waste coming out of those roids. Which there would be. IMO they just eject 99.99% of the roid into the sun because it's useless. -Liang I...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:23:00
|
1786. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
PerrinAybarra wrote: this was tried early in eve and was a disaster on the economy to the lack of minerals on market even was more trouble for 0.0 markets. Alliances were limiting miners on how far you could empty an asteroid because if it was ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:22:00
|
1787. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: Asteroids keep re-condensing from debris of exploded ships. Its the circle of life. So you're saying that Amamake top belt has the best roids in all of Eve? Come get'em miners! -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:22:00
|
1788. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
King Rothgar wrote: My alt received a warning for this a couple days ago. A player petitioned me for decloaking him, not generating lag. However, I was still formally warned for doing this and all drones were despawned. Upon petitioning the war...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:19:00
|
1789. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Easthir Ravin wrote: Greetings Really? Since when is free stuff an exploit. Get your haulers out and loot. Thats like saying the wreaks left behind on gate after a fleet battle are an exploit. Waaaiiiittt a second this is a troll right? east ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:17:00
|
1790. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
stoicfaux, that assumes that there isn't an incredible amount of waste coming out of those roids. Which there would be. IMO they just eject 99.99% of the roid into the sun because it's useless. -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:14:00
|
1791. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Copine Callmeknau wrote: I received two formal warnings for this tactic and then had an account temp-banned. So yes, it's an exploit. I pestered the GM as to why exactly, the official stance seems to be that it's not technically an exploit unl...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:11:00
|
1792. New Craze That Id Like To Know It It's Considered An Exploit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've seen people banned over this, and every time I've petitioned it a GM has wiped the gate and warned the people that did it. -Liang Ed: Note that this is different than strategically placed items for decloaking. It's the mass drone/can spam t...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:08:00
|
1793. There's something that's always bothered me about Eve... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dennis Gregs wrote: You didn't think this through, OP. If you know anything about Istvaan, you'd know that he probably *did* think this through. FWIW, I kinda agree and kinda disagree. It'd damn sure make the game more "exciting" and losses ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 17:06:00
|
1794. Easiest to Hardest ships to fly - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
That Slicer better stay outside 13-14km or it's ******. As a rule I don't like to get closer than 15-16km. -Liang
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 16:39:00
|
1795. Faction Battlecruisers - Would they work? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Songbird wrote: so faction battlecruisers I want a Sansha BC with the following: 6 Highs (4 turrets) 6 Mids 6 Lows Special Ability: 100% bonus to Medium Energy Turret damage Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 20% Energy Turret capacitor usage per l...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 16:36:00
|
1796. Sticky:Dev blog: Ship balancing winter update - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This sounds really fantastic. I encourage you to put 5% damage + 10% optimal with 5 turrets and 4 mids on the Omen! -Liang Ed: Doing this to the NOmen would work fine for me too. I don't mind paying for a good cruiser. :)
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 16:28:00
|
1797. [Winter] Support Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: The drones are definitely something more useful for PVE and repping i between fights. We very well could replace the drone bonus with a tracking link bonus, but we'll see. I despise that tracking link bonus. Seriously, acti...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 16:08:00
|
1798. [Winter] Support Cruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: They also rely more strongly on role bonuses than skill bonuses so that they will continue to be viable even without Cruiser 5. I believe that the range role bonus is fine but the drone rep amount/energy transfer role bon...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 16:03:00
|
1799. The Typhoon - not many posts about it... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: You don't hear much about the typhoon, not because it is sub par or even mediocre. It is because it takes very good skills to truly unlock its potential. It is a ship for high skill point higher experienced players. These ...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 00:55:00
|
1800. Faction Battlecruisers - Would they work? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Pink Marshmellow wrote: All I can see from your posts is that you have some strong hate against Tech 3 ships, but don't clearly show why they are unbalanced and how they should be balanced. All I hear from you is that you say Tech 3 are OP, b...
- by Liang Nuren - at 2012.09.11 00:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |