EVE Search - Posts by Lord WarATron

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1181-1200 of 4531 for by author Lord WarATron (0,45 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200
1181. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 18:21:08 Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 18:20:19 Originally by: Lady Karma Originally by: Goumindong Which brings us to the problem: there is only one viable fitting and gang... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 18:19:00
1182. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 17:10:06 Originally by: Ephemeron Originally by: Lord WarATron Anyhow back to the question I asked you, How do you feel aboutweb scripts giving low poer webs, such as 37.5% t1 20km webs(45... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 17:10:00
1183. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Matrixcvd The only way i would go for a nano change is if dock/undock/redock, and docking ranges were nerfed. As a compromise... While we disagree on nano, I have to agree 110% with any dock/undock/redock nerf. -- B... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 16:59:00
1184. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Matrixcvd Originally by: Lord WarATron But lets be honest here. Nano will either get nerfed or a counter boosted. It is not a question of IF but a question of WHEN. Out of the two, what would you prefer? How do yo... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 16:31:00
1185. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Matrixcvd Originally by: Lord WarATron Ok ok, ignoring all that, here is what this boils down to. Nanos have a reasonable counter below 10km. Above 10-13km, it is not a reasonable counter around. It is more complex ... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 15:50:00
1186. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 15:11:55 Originally by: Matrixcvd Basically Boris, lets break it down. I see by calling me Boris multiple times in your post, nano's are somehow balanced. I do not understand the logic th... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 15:09:00
1187. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 08:27:45 Originally by: techzer0 Edited by: techzer0 on 25/03/2008 07:24:36 Originally by: Lord WarATron Either CCP will nerf nano to uselessness or introduce a less complex counter. I... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 08:25:00
1188. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Lord WarATron So you can either get a nerf to render the whole tactic obsolete, or go for a boost that still keeps your tactic viable but give competent gangs a counter. For example, long r... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 07:08:00
1189. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 25/03/2008 07:07:19 Originally by: Silencio Nohay'Banda You missed the point due to paying extra attention to irrelevant detail. what I'm saying is: the counters are there, they're simple: jam, damp, neut, w... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.25 07:05:00
1190. Capacitor now effects Passive Shields?!?! - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 24/03/2008 13:16:22 Originally by: Silentblue1987 Edited by: Silentblue1987 on 24/03/2008 13:00:33 it would look that way.. but he tanks lv4 missions with this setup, and BETTER than my raven.. he was ru... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.24 13:15:00
1191. Golem vs CNR - straw poll - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Originally by: J'Mkarr Soban This is a very similar argument to Nightmare/Paladin discussion, and amounts to pretty much the same thing: it's down to personal preference, but the tractor bonus and fitting requirements make things easier. ... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.24 12:59:00
1192. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Crusty Clout The whiners make some good points that they want fixed, heres what I got from it: 1. Tank and spank should be the only playstyle 2. My 100M BS should be able to beat your 200M smaller ship ( i mean cmon my ship... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.24 08:41:00
1193. Defeating the blob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: TornSoul Originally by: Lord WarATron Unless the OP tells us how he wants a end battle to look, I doubt anyone can say if this solution is valid or not Alright I'll say it again : I don't care Some people ... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.24 00:33:00
1194. Eject from station = Loss - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 24/03/2008 00:22:06 Originally by: Jeremaid Pang Originally by: Lord WarATron 1. Undock = pvp 2. If you want to log in a dangerous station, do so your own risk. Log at a safespot insted Pity abo... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.24 00:18:00
1195. Defeating the blob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2008 16:51:10 Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Lord WarATron But ships really need 10X the structure for that to mean anything So long as the penalties were severe enough you wouldn... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 16:48:00
1196. Defeating the blob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2008 15:28:44 Originally by: TornSoul Originally by: Lord WarATron There is NO problem with blobs. Originally by: TornSoul I'm not going to argue if getting rid of blob warfare is f... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 15:26:00
1197. Defeating the blob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Updating 1 min -- Billion Isk Mission - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 15:07:00
1198. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2008 15:04:46 Originally by: Silencio Nohay'Banda There's no one setup beat all. for instance, if you fight a capital ship would you not bring dedicated neut ships? If you're ratting would you not set... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 15:01:00
1199. Stasis Webifier II Buff/Balance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2008 11:07:44 Originally by: Kagura Nikon Originally by: Lord WarATron Webs need scripts to be honest. Most competent nano pilts never really get into web range and web does not decelerate pe... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 11:07:00
1200. Stasis Webifier II Buff/Balance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2008 09:51:35 Originally by: Bunj The current stats of the stasis webifier II are not in line with the other t2 propulsion jaming modules. The stasis webifer II needs a slight boost to range to make it... - by Lord WarATron - at 2008.03.23 09:49:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.