EVE Search - Posts by Lord Zim

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 98 for by author Lord Zim (0,77 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
1. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] I'm not talking about POSes, sov isn't related to POSes. And when I talk about "alliances which can be toppled with a push", I mean alliances which has more or less failurecascaded, they just haven't realized it yet. As to delve, heh. I think you... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.04 11:30:00
2. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Adamai wrote: Yea good point; but lets face it, putting pos towers up in nul sec isnt exactly difficult, and uts made far easier with a massive fleet to help do it safely. You've obviously never seen or experienced the old system, since you'r... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.04 09:25:00
3. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Beachura wrote: Poetic is bang on, posting some very intelligent and flexible comments on the possible future of null security alliances in eve online. He may post some good ideas, but this topic wasn't his strongest foray, as is evidenced by... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.02 11:27:00
4. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Adamai wrote: I thought the sov changes were put in place to prevent large alliances from owning vast amounts of space to make it possible for smaller alliances to get in on the 0.0 fun! Last I checked, the sov changes were put into place, no... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.02 09:31:00
5. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Dank Man wrote: Of course goons want bottom up approach to income, and to get rid of high value assets that a powerful alliance or coalition could hold. Eventually they will be chased back to high sec with thousands of noobs to pay for SRP, wha... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.02 02:39:00
6. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Spurty wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Spurty wrote: CCP should be enriching system and capping the numbers entities can hold sov of, at the same time. Exponential bill per constellation perhaps? Say hello to GSF1, GSF2, GSF3, Test1, Test2, Test... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.01 14:14:00
7. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Actually, I forgot one thing about your proposed solution: last I checked there were no way, through CREST etc, to see who mined what, which means mining is still not taxable, and people will just be mining and compressing, or mining in hisec inst... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.01 09:48:00
8. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Poetic Stanziel wrote: Zhade Lezte wrote: So basically, you were framing it to make The Mitanni look as bad as possible while completely ignoring that he was arguing for CCP to get to fixing both tech and implementing bottom-up income as fas... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.10.01 07:49:00
9. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Spurty wrote: CCP should be enriching system and capping the numbers entities can hold sov of, at the same time. Exponential bill per constellation perhaps? Say hello to GSF1, GSF2, GSF3, Test1, Test2, Test3. (It won't work. People should st... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.30 23:54:00
10. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Point out where, in the transcript, he advocates that there should be "18-24 months of ridiculous income until he got what he wanted". - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.30 20:51:00
11. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Poetic Stanziel wrote: Lord Zim wrote: So, no comment on your adament insistence that mittens supposedly "wanted the technetium train to continue unabated for another 18 months"? While CCP debated and (maybe) created this whole bottom-up in... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.30 19:59:00
12. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] So, no comment on your adament insistence that mittens supposedly "wanted the technetium train to continue unabated for another 18 months"? Are you seriously saying that we, the players, should spend considerable effort to build a clunky system t... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.30 18:19:00
13. Bottom-Up Taxation: The Tools Already Exist - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] In your previous thread, you claimed (erroneously) that mittens wanted "the technetium train to continue unabated for another 18 months", and when asked about it, the thread died. Now, you're saying that GSF should make an elaborate proprietary a... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.30 12:48:00
14. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Poetic Stanziel wrote: A. I never said it was a bad thing. Except the first thing you do is harp on about how tech being nerfed has made everybody turn into dumbasses, and to lambast them for crying "why the **** don't you fix nullsec for onc... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.27 08:52:00
15. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Poetic Stanziel wrote: SmilingVagrant wrote: These hard choices have always had to be made. The North were really the only ones that got to escape it in recent years due to the tech booms. You do realize that nullsec isn't just "The north" r... - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.27 07:56:00
16. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] I don't have an SA account, but hump that strawman for all you're worth. Also link that thread, I want something to laugh at. - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.26 23:47:00
17. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Breaking news: stating facts is "getting hostile". And now, the weather. - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.26 23:20:00
18. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Sure. It'd fit right in alongside your other ******** posts about, well, anything. - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.26 23:07:00
19. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Another edition of too snotty, didn't read. - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.26 20:55:00
20. Own What You Can Afford - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Actually, Poetic Stanziel, you should probably have a gander at http://themittani.com/features/hard-truths-fixing-nullsec-income - by Lord Zim - at 2012.09.26 16:28:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.