| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CSM5 only did that by making nullsec go "hey, morons, step away from the keyboard and let us show you how it's done", though. :v:
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 12:42:00
|
2. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
It's very, very easy to consider CSM7 as an ineffective CSM, simply because the only major thing I've seen the CSM7 being particularly involved in (not that I've been paying that much attention, but still) was the STV-gate.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 12:22:00
|
3. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Good thing CCP didn't make the voting UI terrible to use. :v:
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.04 22:29:00
|
4. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Actually, no, there's no point, it should've ended on my part with "gatecamping isn't a problem with/for lowsec", since that's all there is to it.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.30 13:03:00
|
5. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: You are missing the point, you can avoid gatecamps easily if you want but it'll restrict the numbers of ship you can fly in LS solo pvp, also if you don't you will lose your ship in a pvp environment disregard of your pvp sk...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.30 11:48:00
|
6. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: That's just like your opinion I can provide facts why it's ruining lowsec : - Average solo pvper can't fly what he wants because we are camping - People won't fleet to fight campers because most of the time they disengage un...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 22:42:00
|
7. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: You must be roleplaying a braindead capsuleer, that could explain why you keep answering wrong. *sigh* I'll keep it simple for you AGAIN : - I never said not dieing to gatecamps is hard when you commit to fly a ship to do so...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 22:12:00
|
8. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: Andski wrote: "engaging 20 dudes on my own should be undeniably in my favor" "people jumping in my 20 dudes fleet should always die because we are camping" "People who suck at eve and jump blind into a gatecamp in a s...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 21:51:00
|
9. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: Why would they "suck" more ? It'll make 1vsx more fair, make smallgang vs smallgang more strategic Because to make any inroads at all against your "instalock" problem, you would have to make every lock excruciatingly lon...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 21:50:00
|
10. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: Pretty easy, add a scaling % for locktime depending on the numbers of ships at any lowsec gate, people can still camp and warp after but I'll give you more time to do ****. So your idea of "fixing gatecamps" (which isn't a...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 21:22:00
|
11. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: It's a bad design, even if only person is getting instalocked per year it's still a bad design, keyword is "bad design". So what would you do to fix it, then, and what would the ramifications be on other parts of EVE? A...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 20:49:00
|
12. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: because noone is fighting in nullsec because lol politics Wrong. Afk Moon Goo wrote: and why fight when you can make easy money Wrong. Afk Moon Goo wrote: I seemed to have touched a chord, moongoo seems to be rea...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 20:30:00
|
13. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
So what you're really here for is to ***** about how moongoo works as a financial tool, after there's been indications that CCP might be working towards a better system for money generation for alliances, and you're bitching at some of the thing...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 20:08:00
|
14. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
So in short, lots of usual trolly catchphrases in the first post, made by a day 0 alt with trolly name, most likely no idea what these "hisec nerfs" it's complaining about actually are, and a hilarious assumption that the only thing wrong with low...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 19:53:00
|
15. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Afk Moon Goo wrote: If they "nerf" high sec they need to nerf nullsec for the same reasons Do tell what these reasons are. Afk Moon Goo wrote: they also need to make low sec attractive and fun . Do tell how this'll benefit either hisec...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 19:30:00
|
16. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Nullbear, "nerfing" hisec, goons overlords and goon's pet. That post ticks all the troll checkboxes.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.29 19:05:00
|
17. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I was going to yap about -75% shield strength in hisec due to regulations, but that doesn't have any impact on the fact that to take down a hisec pos, you have to wardec that corp, and when that happens they have 24 hours to pull it down, meaning ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.28 17:08:00
|
18. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Aineko Macx wrote: You're preaching to the converted, my main is a long time 0.0 citizen. The quoted statement was directed more at Malc, because while he formulated a desirable destination (from a grunt perspective), he hasn't said much about ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.28 13:06:00
|
19. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Aineko Macx wrote: From the farms and fields lessons learned: Making something tedious will not stop players doing it if it's very clearly the best option. They'll do it, and they'll hate it Going to 0.5 for production would be the only sens...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.28 12:09:00
|
20. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Exactly like profit margins shifted when the PI system changed. I literally giggle every time I remember how loudly and proudly people were proclaiming that it would KILL HISEC PI PROFITABILITY, and yet...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.03.28 11:14:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |