| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dynast wrote: Lord Zim wrote: And while the LP store enables you to get an ISK transfer from other players, transforming the LPs into modules or whatever is an isk sink. People aren't going to know you're using a technical economic defin...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.23 22:03:00
|
2. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Kuehnelt wrote: IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Lord Zim wrote: IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Faction Warfare, where the LP store is an ISK faucet and PVP is an ISK sink. Wrong. The LP store is an IS...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.23 21:41:00
|
3. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kuehnelt wrote: If you want to talk about anybody's wallet , and anybody's ability to finance pvp, then the LP store is just one of many ways to acquire isk and pvp is a major way to lose it. Then you can call it an isk fountain, not a faucet.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.23 07:59:00
|
4. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Faction Warfare, where the LP store is an ISK faucet and PVP is an ISK sink. Wrong. The LP store is an ISK sink, and PVP is an ISK faucet.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.22 22:33:00
|
5. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dynast wrote: Doesn't fly dude. If the mechanics were the cause, it'd have long since happened up in Cal/Gal space as well.. but it hasn't. We've had months now for once side to achieve dominance and drive the other out, instead we have pushes ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.22 07:47:00
|
6. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dynast wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Are you seriously trying to guilt him into saying it was his fault, when CCP made a game mechanic which is gameable as all hell? A ***** move is a ***** move whether or not it is profitable. It's like betting ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.22 00:56:00
|
7. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Frankly you are just annoyed that somebody else has a moon-goo scale cash printing mechanism in play (as a victory boon for winning faction war). Wrong. Jade Constantine wrote: But don't feel too bad - I do fully e...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.21 16:57:00
|
8. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: What Inferno FW 2.0 actually brought to the table was a reason to utterly annihilate the enemy militia (reliable tier 5 riches) What Inferno FW 2.0 actually brought to the table was a reason to join the winning faction...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.21 16:46:00
|
9. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Barrogh Habalu wrote: It's not about e-bushido, but about people who were in Amarr militia like forever making their own Amarr LP pretty damn worthless by grinding plexes for Minmatar. Sure, they get ISK anyways, but when they log on their Amar...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.21 12:47:00
|
10. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Darek Castigatus wrote: IbanezLaney wrote: Seems to be a lot of people in Amarr who plex against themselves with their own alts and still wonder why their militia can't get anywhere. It's really not that tricky to see the problem here. ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.21 12:34:00
|
11. I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
What's this? Tons of people gaming the FW system for max isk by joining the winning side, instead of being e-bushido honourable RPers? Shocking. Just like it when players' interest in incursions went more or less away overnight when they weren't ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.08.21 00:45:00
|
12. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
There's a vast difference between "it's not fair" and "nobody'll wardec anyone ever again".
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.13 19:34:00
|
13. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Given that 1.1 introduced the mandatory interruption in defensive ally participation I certainly can. A 24 hour interruption every 2 weeks doesn't even come close to being an issue in comparison with the issues fixed b...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.13 01:12:00
|
14. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: There is no "except" - people either believe these things or they don't. Oh hey look, what's this ? CCP Soundwave wrote: Hey guys We're looking at ways to iterate on the system post release. Contract length and al...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 23:13:00
|
15. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: I'm saying I don't think many people believe them (on the rationale for the 1.1 wardec changes - certainly not the "merc profession" who we are told these changes are supposed to protect and foster). You should really tr...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 18:18:00
|
16. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: I don't think many people actually believe them (certainly not the "mercs") So you're once again saying CCP lied, then? Krystalline Meth wrote: u even ignoring me now lol. that prob you talking of was proposed to f...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 16:20:00
|
17. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: I don't think you can possibly know when CCP "initiated" these changes any better than the rest of us did (unless you have some kind of inside track) but as I pointed out to SoniClover on the original thread Honda Accord...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 14:14:00
|
18. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: What happened is that we used the Inferno wardec system as it was intended to be used (from the devblogs released in advantage of Inferno) and rapidly built a defensive coalition capable of kicking his troops down the st...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 13:50:00
|
19. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Krystalline Meth wrote: u are the only dude doing that. Nope. Krystalline Meth wrote: So it hurts small guy you don't care :right: Krystalline Meth wrote: It hurts small guy you don't care :right: again. Nope. If the mechanic had ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 13:47:00
|
20. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Krystalline Meth wrote: u don't read too well yourself mate. Most of your posting is like you have your hands over your ears not listening to anyone else. I'm not going to start agreeing with people who keep insisting a green ball is actually...
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.07.12 08:48:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |