Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Question about the mechanics of statics - in Wormholes [original thread]
you ignored the new sig without scanning it.
- by MadbaM - at 2015.03.18 18:38:03
|
2. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Reactivate my account please. thanks in advance
- by MadbaM - at 2015.03.08 18:49:26
|
3. Rolling out, take two. - in Wormholes [original thread]
Sad news guys hope you all find a place to get back to having fun in W-Space.
- by MadbaM - at 2014.06.28 07:06:00
|
4. Capital escalation tips required - in Wormholes [original thread]
Hayley Enaka wrote: With 5 dreads and at least 21 webs and 12 paints against them, I would've expected to see HK lose a few more ships. Or at least d/c another Nag so you can see their full fleet comp. Nice kills as always EDIT: http://kb.har...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.06.27 00:00:00
|
5. Plagerized IDEA: wormhole effects via bombs - in Wormholes [original thread]
You must be new here
- by MadbaM - at 2014.06.18 23:35:00
|
6. Wormhole Recruiting - in Wormholes [original thread]
All big corps start as small ones, but id disagree with the advertising thing i feel its absolutely important for corps to advertise themselves. The reason you haven't found a solid answer is because there isn't one, you need to tailor how you re...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.05.27 02:11:00
|
7. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Anize Oramara wrote: a product of the harshest and most difficult (esp form a logistics pov) space to live in. That's the argument you fail to properly consider, WH space is currently risk free if you have the slightest idea how to run your ...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.04.19 09:22:00
|
8. One end of the wormhole moved - in Wormholes [original thread]
Hesod Adee wrote: - I warp to a bookmark of a wormhole. A bookmark I know is good because I've used it before - Wormhole isn't there. - I scan down a new wormhole sig in system. - It's not a new wormhole. It goes to the system the other hol...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.04.09 06:02:00
|
9. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Fox Troy wrote: CCP are you serious? There is enough dangers in WH. The idea to make delay at detecting k162 it's discrimination of WH-players, you don't let them any chance to save themself. You think that there is not enough pvp in WH? You a...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.04.07 18:40:00
|
10. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Your addressing your questions to Fozzie and i quoted Fozzie from his OP, your asking question to which Fozzie has already given you answers. I'm seriously starting to question my own sanity here, honestly not sure who the crazy one is but im fai...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 20:12:00
|
11. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bjurn Akely wrote: What problem is it you are trying to fix? Too little PvP? In what class of holes (any, C5-6)? Should mining be culled specifically? Do you want some parts to be saver for PvE runners? Or is it a brainstorm thing with n...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 19:47:00
|
12. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bane Nucleus wrote: MadbaM wrote: Show me your history of losses of PVE ships in W-Space! according to the info i can find your total PVE losses in W-Space amounts to 1 noctice. Now please tell me how long you have been in W-Space and how ...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 18:29:00
|
13. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bjurn Akely wrote: MadbaM wrote: I feel i may have explained myself poorly but i can't think of a better way to describe it, simply put if i find you the Class of WH has no affect on the danger i present to you. You're intel is flawed....
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 18:26:00
|
14. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
All classes of WH have the same Dangers the only thing that changes from a C1 to a C6 is the scale, i see you spend allot of time in Low Sec. An apt comparison therefor may be the lowsec DED sites with the acceleration gate functioning as a WH, th...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 17:49:00
|
15. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Safety is not an opinion, you may think your safe but that dose not mean you are that is called ignorance or denial depending. Safety is a very real and measurable construct and can be defined as such. America even have a colour coding system for ...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 16:55:00
|
16. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bjurn Akely wrote: Go to eve-census.com and see for yourself. I deem it unfair that there should be some sort of entry bar for peoples opinions to matter. How long, how much etc. I'm not saying his opinion isn't valid or worth less than m...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 16:39:00
|
17. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
mkint wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Hey guys, thanks for the feedback so far. One thing I want to clarify so that people don't panic, this proposal and any potential change on this scale would not be in the cards for the Summer expansion. We wan...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 16:17:00
|
18. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Newt BlackCompany wrote: There's already a delay of a minute or so. You have to actively spam the 'show anomalies' button to see new sigs immediately. This is as it should be. The net result of this change will be that the big wh alliances wil...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 16:04:00
|
19. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bjurn Akely wrote: What problem is it you are trying to fix? Too little PvP? In what class of holes (any, C5-6)? Should mining be culled specifically? Do you want some parts to be saver for PvE runners? Or is it a brainstorm thing with no clea...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 15:59:00
|
20. Sticky:Potential Idea for Discussion: Delaying signature appearance for... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Phoenix Jones wrote: Said **** about polarization In your very long post you confuse risk with suicide, the second you jump your last cap through to roll a C5 + hole or an Orca C4- your effectively reducing the mass to a point where anything...
- by MadbaM - at 2014.03.27 14:17:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |