Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
41. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Well one good thing has come out of this. My expected 14+ million SP pool. Rather handy to have tbh, thanks.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.09 15:47:47
|
42. Bumping Freighters in highsec - A legitimate counter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: I did provide a link, scroll up. Jesus. I think Jesus was in that thread as well.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.09 01:28:39
|
43. Bumping Freighters in highsec - A legitimate counter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Oh it's Sgt Special. Please explain when the level of safety hauling in freighters can be 99.9%, why do you feel the need for improving that? Also, when safety can be achieved with one extra pilot. Why do we need game breaking, loophole enablin...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.09 01:16:57
|
44. Sticky:[February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Mag's wrote: :EFFORT: Coming from you lot and how desperate you are to ensure you have to put in zero effort to gank and have no opposition, that is laughable. I'm always up for more effort and more challenges, just not to...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.09 00:52:49
|
45. Sticky:[February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Answer this, if red freight are able to reduce the risk of ganking to as close to 0 as you can get then why cant you? :EFFORT:
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.08 23:25:54
|
46. Faction set bonus - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faction modules already have better stats. So I say no to your detailed proposal.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.08 17:22:08
|
47. Convert Triage Carrier to Force Auxiliary / Force Auxiliary skill ra... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Check this post out.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.08 17:02:25
|
48. Sticky:[March] Heavy Stasis Grapplers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: You need to read twitter, Fozzie said it stacks about an hour ago https://twitter.com/GrathTelkin/status/696460014685257728 Yep we definitely need to read twitter and not the official release forum, when we want detailed...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.08 13:26:01
|
49. Sticky:[February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: You say bumping is super easy and risk free yet when we say you can use to defend freighters it's suddenly too hard and risky. You say ganking is risk free and super easy yet when you are told to gank a wreck it's suddenly too ...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.08 10:57:49
|
50. 2 new Internet Connection offered to run today!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Buzz Whatnow.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 20:09:44
|
51. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bellend Jennie wrote: just cancelled all my accounts and it feels so good! You're right about that at least, it does feel good. Thanks.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 20:03:23
|
52. What kind of scam is the new FAX skill book? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
kahn liam wrote: Funny I thought the combination of tactical logistics and carrier skills allowed my to fly triage. I must be mistaken. Well I will be soon because that combination is being switched. What about the people that only trained carr...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 14:13:40
|
53. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Mag's wrote: Which is it? why not both I have a feeling it is, but I'm giving him an out.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 14:06:27
|
54. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Mag's wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: made around 20 billion for two deaths Wow, that sucks. My alt has made over 100 billion in highsec and has never died once. So either you're lying, or you're wrong. im from 200...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 13:06:36
|
55. Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: made around 20 billion for two deaths Wow, that sucks. My alt has made over 100 billion in highsec and has never died once. So either you're lying, or you're wrong.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.07 12:38:52
|
56. I've reformed my criminal ways - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
No thanks.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.06 17:01:55
|
57. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
bigbud skunkafella wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: bigbud skunkafella wrote: fleet engagement flag would have to be activated by the victim of the bumping for the umpteenth time, so the above scenario could only happen if the victim chose t...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.06 16:44:44
|
58. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: bigbud skunkafella wrote: Rhamnousia Nosferatu wrote: Yes, yes its a competitive and consequence laiden game in which: - Someone can indefinitely (or until downtime) prevent a freighter from warping using just a bu...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.06 10:39:29
|
59. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Bella Jennie wrote: - so first: is it intentional or not? *facepalm The game engine cannot determine intent. Like, at all, it lacks the capacity. I tried to explain this to bigbud. Apparently it didn't matter.
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.05 22:55:44
|
60. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bella Jennie wrote: Mag's wrote: Bella Jennie wrote: OK, then please tell me why BUMPING with impunity in HISEC is so vital as to be defended to such an extent as exhibited here? I actually answered that in the quote. Please re-read it. ...
- by Mag's - at 2016.02.05 22:44:41
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |