Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
1161. Putting the screwes to highsec gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
chaosgrimm wrote: Mag's wrote: As far as time exposed is concerned, it's still exposer and makes them susceptible. But is you want more, how about a change to facpo? I see no mention of that risk from you, but yet you complain of exposer. ...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 23:42:26
|
1162. Ganking, Hi-Sec, Security Status and Emergent Gamplay - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Oh look, it's that thread again. 'Just one more nerf and it'll be balanced.'
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 23:31:56
|
1163. Putting the screwes to highsec gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
chaosgrimm wrote: Mag's wrote: Guaranteed ship loss, sec loss, chance of gank failure, the inability to roam freely in high sec with a ship when -5 sec or lower, open season to all anywhere any time and kill rights, are not risks that ganker...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 22:49:40
|
1164. Putting the screwes to highsec gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Guaranteed ship loss, sec loss, chance of gank failure, the inability to roam freely in high sec with a ship when -5 sec or lower, open season to all anywhere any time and kill rights, are not risks that gankers are susceptible to then? Must be w...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:55:17
|
1165. Meaningful Combat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Read up to "lack of consequences of criminal acts" and stopped. This.
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:48:34
|
1166. CCP why the hell are you letting this happen? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Mag's wrote: Rowells wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: "This game'll be dead in six months. Mark my words." ~ Elan Dochin (circa 2004) We all know it was dead way before then. I believe it had a bad smell about it, w...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:47:31
|
1167. CCP why the hell are you letting this happen? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: ImYourMom wrote: This is why eve is dying and will continue to do. Oh well i guess that attitude will bode well when the eve server closes down leaving you and everyone else high and dry and thinking why...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:38:45
|
1168. End of the Awoxer? Is eve getting too soft? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Yep if this thing is active in a corp, there should be a 10% Concord tax. Or the same as NPC corps, I forget now what that sits at.
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:32:17
|
1169. Putting the screwes to highsec gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: chaosgrimm wrote: There should be some balance when it comes to the ganking profession. Players should have a means to screw with your money making efforts. The problem with the ganking profession is that any risks you would i...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 21:18:23
|
1170. A sign of hope part 2 - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Paranoid Loyd wrote: Beatrix Dacella wrote: Having trouble finding the Machariel kill as well, don't see it anywhere. From the system overview linked above click stats link then click battleship https://zkillboard.com/kill/44194461/ A...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 18:48:38
|
1171. Sticky:A Message Regarding "Hyperdunking" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Market McSelling Alt wrote: What are you even talking about now. Your points are unraveling and becoming desperate. Are they? I'll leave this here for you. Annette Nolen wrote: I wish every gank was a hyperdunk, it's really easy to defend a...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 18:45:05
|
1172. Putting the screwes to highsec gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: One idea put forward is that -5 and worse security status should bar you from entering a station. That doesn't stop an alt with an Orca. So, I started boiling up the soup that fills my skull and came up with something...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 18:21:36
|
1173. Sticky:A Message Regarding "Hyperdunking" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ima Wreckyou wrote: Market McSelling Alt wrote: baltec1 wrote: Market McSelling Alt wrote: Because the Cat fleet has nothing to lose. They can gank just for tears, where the Tornados have to gank to cover their costs. And no Tippia...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 18:13:16
|
1174. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: I'd personally like to see the topic changed to the entire intelligence and stealth system. We try to focus on any single aspect and it drives down to all or nothing on it and forgets that there are other tools available that nee...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 18:09:22
|
1175. A sign of hope part 2 - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
So what am I looking at here? I just see the normal CODE ships dying to concord. Hardly anything new. Kill mails can be posted, you just need to remove or cover the victims name.
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 14:02:34
|
1176. Sticky:A Message Regarding "Hyperdunking" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Red Teufel wrote: There is a cost but very little risk involved for the aggressor. CCP only stated that hyperdunking does not break any current rules. It reminds me of the station game where a pirate would store his ship into his carrier to avo...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 13:55:43
|
1177. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brunik Rokbyter wrote: I have read all of this, but what it boils down to is either you are satisfied with the concept of assets being 100% invulnerable while in space with no player at the helm, or you aren't. Once THAT is established, then yo...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 13:49:22
|
1178. Sticky:A Message Regarding "Hyperdunking" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote: Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Concord Guy's Cousin wrote: As far as I know Concord will intervene if you shoot at them, but if you can fly them you can certainly board them and steal them . You can also target them...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.28 12:31:21
|
1179. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harry Saq wrote: Mag's, your argument is either ignorant (which you maybe shouldn't be posting on the topic if so) or deliberately disingenuous That maybe true, if reading and comprehension is a problem.
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.27 20:11:33
|
1180. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Roxanne Quall wrote: your game mechanic that you obviously hate is local, Eve gave you a solution. So your point is Mute And I've said time and time again to you that ships would have the technology to do d-scan and EVE has stated that local i...
- by Mag's - at 2015.01.27 20:08:50
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |