EVE Search - Posts by Mund Richard

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 790 for by author Mund Richard (0,11 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40
1. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] X Gallentius wrote: Bouh Revetoile wrote: IMO, the biggest problem of armor tanking is that EWAR don't translate into EFT numbers... With active armor tanking you lose the mid slots to capacitor booster mods. Example is dual rep incursus ne... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.28 22:42:00
2. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] You're not the first to ask about why one must take the smaller caliber guns to V and then spec for battleship-sized weaponry. I believe the answer was a mild "we'll think about that", but may I be proven wrong. - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.23 02:30:00
3. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] May O'Neez wrote: Either Cyclone or Claymore. Now both are dead ( or the second will be ). Nothing bad happening to the Claymore as far as I know. That is, winmatar - like the rest - will have two command ships, one with missiles, the other... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.22 14:58:00
4. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Denson022 wrote: My point is that a Cane / Drake/ Harbinger will need less time to kill a 35K ehp cruiser, the Cyclone will kill it but it will require more time wich mean more DPS to tank over the time. hope that clarifies my idea You are s... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.21 14:47:00
5. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Denson022 wrote: Anything that comes closer will make more DPS than the Cyclone or has more tank... wich is bad for the cyclone the Minmatar tanking BC. So your problem is, that if the fastest BC goes too close (7.5km, why would a Cyclone be ... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.21 13:04:00
6. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Goldensaver wrote: Yeah, sorry about that. You've done nothing to offend me really, so why am I angry at you? I'm just getting upset with the endless bit I'm hearing about how terrible the Gallente ships will be after every patch. I heard it fo... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 19:41:00
7. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Maximus Andendare wrote: X Gallentius wrote: If the Prophesy can out-rep the Myrm and Brutix, then what is the Myrm/Brutix niche, and why do I need to type Myrm/Brutix when they both should fill their own unique niche? This doesn't even con... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 16:36:00
8. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] There's a humongous difference between active tanking and fighting inside scram range with guns and drones, as opposed to active tanking and fighting inside scram range with drones and guns! ...I just can't find it yet. Maybe the Brutix is meant... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 16:02:00
9. What is wrong with Drake ? Why people ask for nerf ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] 5 posts in a row may not be the best way to make people sympathetic to your cause. Quote: Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have n... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 11:18:00
10. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Zach meii wrote: And my part of post doesn't show up awesome. Forum eats a lot of posts. Something to do with drafts and the way they are handled. Had Google Chrome save me several times going "back". - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 08:50:00
11. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Malius Sparklighter wrote: Why did I even train BC II when the tier I is better? Not sure, so I'll ask. Do you fly with a BC skill of II, or is your grief that the (formerly) tier 2 BC is now not as shiny as the (formerly) tier 1? PG concerns.... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 00:32:00
12. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Mund Richard wrote: Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I factored that in actually. In most cases a rate of fire bonus is about equivalent to a damage bonus because it increases the firing cost. um... If you are worried ... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.20 00:01:00
13. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] DrJonF Rockit wrote: I"m sorry, but I'm just here to remind/tell/inform you that the Drake is popular NOT BECAUSE it is a superior ship to any other ship.... but because it is a cool looking (at one point affordable) reliable craft. Drake is fa... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 22:32:00
14. Toss a fella a bone! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] D'uce wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: It's called ISBoxer and it's not a dark grey area, it's allowed. See now this is all I hear... Its "Bad" or "Not allowe" then someone comes along "It's allowed" Throws papers up in frustration The th... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 22:29:00
15. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I factored that in actually. In most cases a rate of fire bonus is about equivalent to a damage bonus because it increases the firing cost. um... If you are worried about ammo cost, maybe you shouldn't PvP. You are r... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 12:32:00
16. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Alxea wrote: Allison A'vani wrote: Quote: Change the penalty on all active armor rigs (Aux Nano Pump, Nanobot Accelerator, and the new Nanobot Overcharger) to increase the powergrid use of local armor reps by 10% instead of reducing s... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 11:22:00
17. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Also, 5% Rate of Fire bonus gives more dps than 5% damage does (33% I believe instead of 25%) , and only the minnies get RoF bonus on BC level. - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 10:55:00
18. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Amber Solaire wrote: The Prophecy was the least used BC......with the new changes, you have guaranteed it will be the least used The new changes are a total joke Missile launchers, but a drone bonus, on an energy weapon-using ship? Once, I want... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.19 00:57:00
19. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Valleria Darkmoon wrote: Mund Richard wrote: Wishing it had one more mid so that it can brawl, I can understand. I wish it had myself. As much as I love utility highs, the Ferox is hurt a bit by being the only BC with 8 highslots, thus less ... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.18 22:25:00
20. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Mundi Kundoni wrote: As a blops user and battlecruiser fanatic I love love love the changes so far! In fact just bought a third account on one of your deals and training it to fly amarr drones with a view to helping out a newbie mate out with a... - by Mund Richard - at 2013.02.18 22:00:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.