| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
781. What is General Discussion for? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Helena Russell Makanen wrote: Dear James 315 alt - sorry your thread was moved to the sub-forum designed for CSM discussion. No brainer there sparky. I am not a James 315 alt and never even forum post on my own alts.
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.07 01:30:00
|
782. What is General Discussion for? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Suvetar wrote: Hi Petrus, I'm sorry if you've ever had the impression that a thread has been moved because "ISD don't like it". Please feel free to use the report button or send a petition in if you think this is the case, but I hope you c...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.07 01:12:00
|
783. What is General Discussion for? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Let's open this can of worms (actually just a beaten to death horse full of worms). I was heartbroken to have my super duper awesome thread moved to a smaller subforum, and I noticed that others are being moved in such fashion. This is all well a...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 20:22:00
|
784. [TL:DR] Game physics not realistic for space flight simulation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TIL Eve is not realistic. Next they'll tell me that FTL communications or transport doesn't exist.
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 20:05:00
|
785. Nerfing Highsec manufacuring and the "End of EVE" as we know it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve is dying. Nano anomaly incursion hisec manufacturing nerf will make everyone go back to WoW.
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 20:02:00
|
786. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Osabojo wrote: ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote: Moving this from General Discussion to Jita Park Speakers Corner. You are terrible at your job and you basically volunteered to be a complete dumbass in public. Congratulations on being an easi...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 02:22:00
|
787. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Back on topic. To the supporters: why do you support James and what things do you think he would do for Eve? To the detractors: why do you oppose James and what things do you think he would do for Eve?
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 01:00:00
|
788. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If it's up to some, this thread (and others like this) would be better hidden away from the eyes of the regular person -- for whom apparently discussing about the possibilities of the future of Eve is not interesting. It would be tucked away to be...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 00:48:00
|
789. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
gulftobay wrote: Could an ISD or GM kindly move this to Jita Park Speakers Corner where it clearly belongs? If you're uncomfortable with the topic of discussion requiring you to actually get informed, think, and make decisions for Eve's fut...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.06 00:11:00
|
790. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anslo wrote: Not really tinfoil hattery. It's a legitimate PR tactic. Make the customers think they're more represented or have a larger voice than they really do. Companies do it all the time. Yes CCP does at times listen to its customers in r...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 23:39:00
|
791. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Oliver wrote: Petrus Blackshell wrote: Paul Oliver wrote: Pleeeease move this thread away to the Jita Park CSM corner where I'll never have to see it again. Typical. "HISEC IS UNDERREPRESENTED!" ... "I DON'T WANNA THINK ABOUT REPRE...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 22:39:00
|
792. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Oliver wrote: Pleeeease move this thread away to the Jita Park CSM corner where I'll never have to see it again. Typical. "HISEC IS UNDERREPRESENTED!" ... "I DON'T WANNA THINK ABOUT REPRESENTATION"
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 22:01:00
|
793. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Petrus Blackshell wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Bump for james - if you will pardon the pun. You get a cookie. That was amazing. Josef Djugashvilis wrote: People endorsing this James character are wearin...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 20:35:00
|
794. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anslo wrote: There's no jumping to conclusions. People like to mine. They think it's fun. If they can't have their fun, they won't stay in Eve. If they like to mine so much, they wouldn't be AFK. See James' article on why paying the mining f...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 19:13:00
|
795. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Bump for james - if you will pardon the pun. You get a cookie. That was amazing. Josef Djugashvilis wrote: People endorsing this James character are wearing blinders or are null dwellers on alts. This guy will pu...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 19:06:00
|
796. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anslo wrote: So I actually read his (James315's) "manifesto" and I just have one thing to say. He's kind of a ****. Thank CCP for those miner buffs. He kind of makes me WANT to go mine...if I could go into Caldari space where he is There's...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 18:50:00
|
797. Objective measurement for risk? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Mal Ishos wrote: Semantics. No. Accuracy. Variability is not the same thing as subjectivity. If the results depends on what you measure, it's not subjective; if the result depends on who does the measuring, it is. ISK/h conta...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 18:02:00
|
798. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Oliver wrote: Judging by those threads I think a considerable portion of highsec players disagree, myself included. Thank you for posting those though, now I know exactly why so many people dislike the guy. Lots of people dislike Mittens...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 17:59:00
|
799. James 315 for unofficial hi-sec representative on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Oliver wrote: Both threads locked by CCP for inciting unconstructive ranting and attacks among the EVE community, and you wanna nominate this guy for something constructive? The threads turned into ranting as peoples' reaction to James' ...
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 17:40:00
|
800. Objective measurement for risk? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mal Ishos wrote: Unless you're referring simply to the number of Posts or Likes one has attained. In which case, LOL. As someone who has lots of spaceship likes, I am offended that you would diminish their importance.
- by Petrus Blackshell - at 2012.09.05 17:21:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |