Pages: [1] |
1. A.T.U vs Scalar... - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Nightsabre I can infact prove that ATU didnt steal the chimera. Heres how. Firstly, I stole it, clearly on an alt. The Chimera was inside of the POS and was bumped out, via another alt. The Chimera was unfitted, had no ...
- by Popychacz - at 2008.08.23 22:52:00
|
2. Tortugan Standings Reset - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Thread delivers Will be weeks until I stop laughing at Tortuga if you just let BoB have c3n and various top ISK moons back in exchange for an no-invasion treaty With all due repsect, Evil Thug it's mor...
- by Popychacz - at 2008.03.26 23:10:00
|
3. New Dev Blog, Chronotis on Asteroids & the Need For Speed InitiativeÖ - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Matthew, I agree entirely but only to the point where we have the balance between logistical value and economic value. The ability to source larger quantities of tritanium in lower sec space has a logistic valu...
- by Popychacz - at 2008.01.28 12:54:00
|
4. New Dev Blog, Chronotis on Asteroids & the Need For Speed InitiativeÖ - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I want giant asteroids that try to eat you. No more serious note: 1. You need to tackle wealth distribution between Loot Refining, Empire, LowSec and 0.0. Keep in mind that bulk of med and hi grade minerals can come from reprocessing mission l...
- by Popychacz - at 2008.01.28 11:27:00
|
5. A Short Transmission on a Few Upcoming Changes - New Chronotis Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So, you're rounding ships needed for t2 manufacturing UP?:P:P:P
- by Popychacz - at 2008.01.25 19:14:00
|
6. New Dev Blog, Community and Forum Changes and Improvements - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
First and foremost - why the bans are not linked to the game? Right now everyone can 'burn' their forum privileges without any consequences. After those changes you will be able to burn for mere 6 months instead of indefinitely. It's not invit...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.12.19 21:59:00
|
7. Sovereignty and starbases, the future! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ok, here is one and it's pretty awesome: spread the process of taking over POS both in space and time. All POS are linked(up to 5 per network), sharing shield and damage. There is both minimal (5ly) and maximal (15ly) link range, to make sure al...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.11.24 01:19:00
|
8. Sovereignty and starbases, the future! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hello CCP Nozh, could you please tell us few important things before we get into serious thinking: 1. How much functionality can we change and/or add? Can we scratch entire POS system we have now (think like the modular POS mentioned before)...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.11.13 18:08:00
|
9. CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh And I think I'm pretty much boned if I want the players to like me, it's been like this forever, you all hate the man with the nerfstick. Well, I'm afraid not. A whole lot of people like TomB for example...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.11.08 20:17:00
|
10. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Popychacz on 24/10/2007 11:03:42 Originally by: CCP Zulupark This idea is not based around anything regarding lag. It's purely a balancing/design idea. How are we not being honest? Hi there! So you spend entire year sq...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.10.24 11:01:00
|
11. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Jin Entres If you want carriers' and motherships' role to be more support oriented, perhaps you should give them some incentives . How about: ò Remote resistance boosters ò Passive (titanesque) gang bonuses to gang member...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.10.21 14:30:00
|
12. Radical, yet simple solution to POS warfare - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
1) Reduce POS shields by 80%. 2) Introduce new sov2 module - intersystem shield linker (30k shields, 20k armor, 10k structure, 120 sec anchor, 60 sec unanchor, 50M ISK) that links POS shields with target POS that's 3LY away. Cannot be used on to l...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.09.16 10:31:00
|
13. PETITION: Reduce fighter spam lag! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Would be so much fun if dev reading this petition used CAODCleaner;-) /NOT signed.
- by Popychacz - at 2007.09.09 10:12:00
|
14. New Staff, New Blog, New Information on Encounters! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A quick scream regarding current exploration: FIX SIFT PROBES! when you have Signal Strength of 1.1, every sane system should round it down to 1 (100% chance of finding a site), but current iteration on TQ truncates it to 0.1 (thus 10% chance to ...
- by Popychacz - at 2007.04.28 16:45:00
|
15. WTS - 30 day GTC's - 150million ISK each - in Sell Orders [original thread]
code works. Fast and painless trade
- by Popychacz - at 2007.02.16 12:16:00
|
16. WTS: 11mil sp miner/viator, obelisk, hulk, occator pilot. - in Sell Orders [original thread]
1,6b
- by Popychacz - at 2007.01.21 22:00:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |