EVE Search - Posts by Portmanteau

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 161-180 of 415 for by author Portmanteau (0,30 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20
161. The way this plays out (ccp pr dept) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Portmanteau on 27/06/2011 18:24:02 nvm - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 18:24:00
162. You guys are not seeing the upside to this - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Portmanteau on 27/06/2011 18:19:36 Originally by: Cel Nobol Edited by: Cel Nobol on 27/06/2011 17:36:46 Edited by: Cel Nobol on 27/06/2011 17:36:24 Okay look, what if you stick around, and then say made a group named... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 18:19:00
163. unsubbing fallacy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: JMERCENARY Edited by: JMERCENARY on 27/06/2011 18:13:37 Originally by: Portmanteau Originally by: Cregg Neir In addition, 5,000 canceled subscriptions don't mean much unless they were paid for with cash... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 18:16:00
164. unsubbing fallacy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Cregg Neir In addition, 5,000 canceled subscriptions don't mean much unless they were paid for with cash. All subscriptions are paid for with cash, it's just someone else's cash in the case of plex paid accounts...... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 18:02:00
165. I, for one, accept the implementation of a SP store. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Irulan Corinno Edited by: Irulan Corinno on 27/06/2011 16:42:08 Originally by: Dopesick sandbox gaming - look it up Yes - freedom to do whatever you want, shape the world accoring to your wishes and no end gam... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 16:49:00
166. Instead of converting Plex into Aurum... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] CCP wants a plex sink plain and simple, they "owe" a ****load of gametime and have more than likely spent the money already, while I understand their need to address this I don't like the potential effects of their solution - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 16:15:00
167. Introducing: MONOCLEGEDDON - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: The BlackDog I'm buying a monocle and forming an exclusive monocle wearers only corp. This thread is now about corp name suggestions please, thx. I can give you a corp ticker... [TW4T] - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 16:05:00
168. Gamers against AUR - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] hmm.... I would love to support this but just can't help feeling that this involves bane ganking the **** out of anyone jumping into ama to protest lol. If I'm wrong I apologize - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 16:02:00
169. GET READY for the ADVERTISING the NEX Store Will Inevitably Bring!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Dex Ironmind For those who think the NEX store is nothing to worry about in and of itself, think again. Here is what happens when micro transactions are introduced into a game. ADS! ADS! and more ADS! I need to get o... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 14:18:00
170. Dear over reactionary babies. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Portmanteau on 27/06/2011 14:14:41 Originally by: St Boltzmann im sure white tree will enjoy the CCP HAMBURGERES he eats on YOUR SUBSCRIPTION DOLLARS while in the meantime OUR GAME IS RUINED will CCP continue this farce? ... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 14:09:00
171. Dear over reactionary babies. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: White Tree MY KITTEN In all seriousness, I heard your bit on eve radio and respect what you had to say, I also read the dev blog revisions you suggested and your subsequent assurances that "gold ammo" definitely means no... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 14:07:00
172. An honest question regarding "pay-to-win" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Portmanteau on 27/06/2011 13:52:39 Originally by: Mercurius Steele Originally by: Toshiroma McDiesel Question about "Golden Ammo" What is the difference from me farming LP to buy faction ammo (puffed into game by CC... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:50:00
173. Dear over reactionary babies. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Urethra Infection Having had the glorious presence of my csm/ceo last night saying how he will be all a-team and **** when he goes to iceland and junk he then regailed us with the sound of his new kitten and how it loves att... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:45:00
174. Alright, I had enough. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Confuzer Spoiled brats indeed. Okay CCP released to fast, okay prices of clothes and stuff are high (who cares?). Pay a little respect to the developers and the people who created it all, and give them time to process our ... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:40:00
175. Alright, I had enough. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Boaz Hedion Merkava Originally by: Tobiaz With plex there already IS a way to P2W. The lastest dev-blog clearly stated no 'gold ammo', which is (I think) a phrase that came from Mittani's to define all that is P2W. ... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:37:00
176. Dear CCP; You win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Tarryn Nightstorm First good, new, halfway-intelligent idea I've heard in what feels like forever, I might add. yes CCP will release a previous iteration to be in direct competition with Incarna... yes it's a very in... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:27:00
177. Dust 514 is going to Fail - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Ashera Yune Does anyone actually believe anyone will be playing this game compared to games like Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3? Even more that its only a PS3 exclusive. Console Shooter games have a short life expectancy... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:20:00
178. An honest question regarding "pay-to-win" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Qual Indirectly it is. Indirectly isn't directly. It is also not guaranteed. With AUR, it's both direct and guaranteed. So no, the two are not comparable, and no on it's way through the econ... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:18:00
179. An honest question regarding "pay-to-win" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Ri**ulo Originally by: Portmanteau Originally by: Ri**ulo I can't see any theories that are more valid than others. All things being equal, the future is uncertain but it doesn't appear to me that AUR co... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:16:00
180. An honest question regarding "pay-to-win" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Ri**ulo Edited by: Ri**ulo on 27/06/2011 13:09:18 Originally by: Uuali The more an MT based mechanic is introduced to the game the less CCP actually has to develop anything other than more items. The game wil... - by Portmanteau - at 2011.06.27 13:11:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.