Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1. Prototype: Dojos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Awesome initiative. Personally I feel that if this was developed and expanded upon in a good way it would be a strong reason towards reactivating in the game.
- by Raimo - at 2014.09.25 14:54:00
|
2. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Can I please have this account activated.
- by Raimo - at 2014.06.10 19:43:00
|
3. Sticky:[Rubicon] Electronic Attack Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Keres and Hyena will make all instalocking camps even more potent while still not making these that useful for other playstyles, not sure if this is a good thing for the game. Maybe some other boost tangent should still be considered?
- by Raimo - at 2013.10.09 12:22:00
|
4. Sticky:[Rubicon] Interceptors - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mr Doctor wrote: Just a thought, how about making nulification an active highslot module that only ceptors can fit. Reason being that sometimes you want to get caught in a bubble. Make the cycletime 10-20secs and also its state as you enter w...
- by Raimo - at 2013.10.09 07:12:00
|
5. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Raimo, 88, 02, 95, 08, 90, 99, 76, 85, 66, 91, 65, 81, 53, 30, 59, 18, 16, 14, 13, 12, 57, 26
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.05 21:15:00
|
6. [Odyssey 1.1] Local Armor and Shield repair module changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cpt Boomstick wrote: Given that armor doesn't have an "extra large" repairer, and shield users not only have them but have ways to fit them on medium size ships, this creates a gap in performance of local tank. A single extra large ancillary sh...
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.01 17:15:00
|
7. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Alliance Tournament XI Prize Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Are these strong enough compared to their peers?
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.01 15:03:00
|
8. [Odyssey 1.1] Command Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Looks like a good overall direction
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.01 14:59:00
|
9. [Odyssey 1.1] Warfare Links, Mindlinks, Gang bonuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Looks like a good 1st step
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.01 14:57:00
|
10. [Odyssey 1.1] Local Armor and Shield repair module changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Amazing, please go ahead with the OP
- by Raimo - at 2013.08.01 14:48:00
|
11. Rule Clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Randomize All wrote: Maybe if Sreegs wasn't on a campaign of getting people's mains forum banned for calling out his lies........ Maybe that would be more mains posting. Who knows?! I know. No s**t!
- by Raimo - at 2012.06.04 15:25:00
|
12. Rule Clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
B4ckstab wrote: CCP Loxy wrote: B4ckstab wrote: "All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012." Its okay to leave the alliance fo...
- by Raimo - at 2012.06.04 08:02:00
|
13. Thanks for the fishes - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: This is getting so pathetic. "Getting"? And OP, unnecessary edit, your thread was spot on. Quoting it just for posterity Ruareve wrote: I'm not one for the politics of Eve. I don't pirate, don't care for drama or ...
- by Raimo - at 2012.06.01 17:48:00
|
14. Thanks for the fishes - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: "General consensus" in this case means "a few Hydra/Outbreak alts"? Ahh, unbanned now! o/
- by Raimo - at 2012.06.01 14:46:00
|
15. Open letter to CCP and the community regarding HYDRA and OB ban from ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: You think that's strange? I'm not really familiar with any games that would let people abuse staff members just because they're customers. Oh some other CCPers reading, fascinating, so it's not just the Goon. But yeah ...
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 16:26:00
|
16. Open letter to CCP and the community regarding HYDRA and OB ban from ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Ding feeble 20 page thread o/
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 15:09:00
|
17. Open letter to CCP and the community regarding HYDRA and OB ban from ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: Klown Walk wrote: Why didn-Št anyone from the AT team respond to any email from them? or give them a warning instead of instantly removing them? hi you seem to have missed the part where the email was posted but wasn't a...
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 12:52:00
|
18. So this year's alliance tournament is the competition for 3rd place? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Gobbins wrote: thats right you didnt get any single char banned you got two entire alliances banned instead - pretty good Raimo wrote: (pls to be not mentioning anything about exploration of newrules and banning of 2 allices tia) Why...
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 12:36:00
|
19. Further investigation required of Alliance B teams - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: This is getting a little pathetic. I'm pretty sure it got pathetic at post 1. I'm pretty sure it got pathetic at ban 1
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 12:33:00
|
20. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Kadesh Priestess wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: because the contents of the email you keep harping on are absolutely irrelevant I'm not surprised. I'm just pointing you at the fact that petition and email requests are far from being the same mean...
- by Raimo - at 2012.05.26 12:30:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |